User talk:Vanished user 6393699/Archive 18

A barnstar for you!

 * Again thank you! If you need to contact me, you know where to go, I'm not a good page designer here so you did a great job! I've tweak a little things, but again thanks! ///Euro Car  GT  22:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages
 * -- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dhoom 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wankhede (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Aadhaar
Hi Ruby Murray,

I developed the article "Aadhaar" from scratch. It was a blank redirect page to UIDAI. The development was done in bits & pieces from 27-Oct-2013 to 18-Nov-2013 (about 3 weeks). I have spent considerable time and effort.

You Ruby Murray (Soham Banerjee) also helped me a lot in making the sentences neutral, editing, formatting etc. which I acknowledged by thanking you.

Today I noticed by work of 3 weeks vandalized - made blank page redirect to UIDAI page which has almost no constructive content (against the spirit of encyclopedia to permeate knowledge).

My contribution from UIDAI pages were deleted in October-2013 on the ground that my contents belonged to 'Aadhaar' program, whereas 'UIDAI' page should contain Organization related content only. I agreed to this logic, hence developed the 'Aadhaar' page from scratch. The traces of development is present on the wiki-server for records.

Please help.

Regards, Ravishyam Bangalore (talk) 09:19, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi, I have warned this user on his talk page for WP:OUTING and for his disruptive editing on UIDAI related topics.Notabede (talk) 10:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
///Euro Car GT  03:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!
Please check you inbox. You got a mail! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibn AlMoafa (talk • contribs) 13:32, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

... thank you!
Thank you for the "thanks"! Welcome to STiki. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 10:31, 22 November 2013 (UTC) Cheers! — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 11:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Nah.. don't thank me. When viewing in STiki it seemed like a removal of content.  Sohambanerjee1998  10:33, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Concur. IPs rarely leave an edit summary, but I had previously thought of pruning the article in a similar manner. Best wishes, — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 10:37, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes it was a fault on my part considering the edit summary, but the last revision had none so bad mixup I guess. But then again you [A registered editor] did'nt leave an edit summary too why blame the poor little guy?  Sohambanerjee1998  10:45, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I am guilty as charged. In mitigation, I have maintained a 100% WP:ES record since September 2011, and in this instance, seeing the STiki tag, I left it for the "automatic rollbacker" to do its thing!

WP:ELMINOFFICIAL
"Normally, only one official link is included. If the subject of the article has more than one official website, then more than one link may be appropriate, under a very few limited circumstances.[8] However, Wikipedia does not provide a comprehensive web directory to every official website." is the official consensus of the project. Any WP:LOCALCONSENSUS would need to have articulated a clear improvement to the encyclopedia before it ignored the rules. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  13:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)