User talk:Vanished user 6814579

April 2024
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 1953 Iranian coup d&. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 02:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Commentary? I added more information that lead up to the coup. I never said who was good or who was bad, only that that Mossadegh went against the constituion if you would like I can change the counter-coup to coup as I do not want to argue but the rest is true. Mosaddegh arrested people like the Shah. I am no fan of the two of them. Mohammad Mosaddegh - Wikipedia says the same. I was adding more info and how the British and Americans were able to coup him. If info leading up to the coup can't be added then things happenings after the coup like the king being a dictator should be treated the same. Also not adding more info about AIOC refusal because the king had to have a voice as well as said in the constituion is tricking the influencing the reader. I added info. CatsUnite (talk) 03:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Edit what you percieve as bad wording of Mossadegh instead of removing everything. We are all here in this website after all to give more information not to delete things because of wordings as you say. CatsUnite (talk) 06:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 1953 Iranian coup d'état. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 09:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Reliable sources
Please read the WP:RS. This is explains that anything you add to an article must be from reliable sources. It was also be verifiable and as stated above from a neutral point of view. --David Tornheim (talk) 09:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)