User talk:Vanished user s4irtj34tivkj12erhskj46thgdg

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Spectator shoes, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Spectator shoes was changed by Radical Ghost (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-05-31T14:46:17+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:46, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, all additions should be supported with reliable, third-party sources. Your recent additions to Types of gestures cited no sources, and have been reverted. If you wish to re-create this content, please be sure to cite reliable sources. Thanks, Cnilep (talk) 14:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Les Animaux dénaturés, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Planet of the Apes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:48, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

See also sections
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.

I've rolled back much of your recent edits where you were spamming article links to See also sections that were only tangentially related. Please familiarize yourself with MOS:SEEALSO. --Ronz (talk) 02:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Non-GMO project
So The Non-GMO Project is a lobbying group of organic producers. How is that appropriate to put on the GMO sites? Shall we also put Biotechnology Industry Organization on the organic sites? This is why you were reverted - you are soapboxing. Jytdog (talk) 03:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Generator Rex (Toy Line)
Regarding this edit summary: "this should never been deleted. info is very scant as they quietly canceled series, &never sold/marketed well to begin, so there's little to nothing to source. I physically own everything released, &emailed mattel personally for full details on rest"

If there is little or nothing to source then that means there should not be an article. From Wikipedia notability: "Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable; if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article" To have an article it should have "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Information from you, the owner, or Mattel, the manufacturer, is definitely not sufficient.

Also, you are admitting that here you have a conflict of interest and therefore should not be writing about products that you own, as that makes it more difficult to write them from a neutral point of view. In this case you should search for third party information about the products. If that doesn't exist then neither should the article. Valenciano (talk) 10:12, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Generator Rex (Toy Line) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Generator Rex (Toy Line) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Generator Rex (Toy Line) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Valenciano (talk) 19:10, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)