User talk:Vanished user sojweiorj34i4f/Archive 6

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot;EdwardsBot (talk) 12:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Meeting in Bristol this Saturday
Hi this is Steve Virgin from the Board of Wikimedia UK

I am a fellow Bristolian

We have a Wikimedia Conference in town this weekend

We were getting some of the Bristol Project Wikipedians together at the Watershed on Saturday night for a Wiki Meet at around 6.30pm.

This is a good opportunity to meet people from the national Chapter, other Chapters from around the world and from the Wikimedia Foundation. There is a bar tab to help proceedings and we would be very keen to see you there.

RSVP - let me know if you are able to come and feel free to invite any other local Wikipedians in Bristol

Steve virgin (talk) 21:29, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot;EdwardsBot (talk) 18:44, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation)
The DYK project (nominate) 18:04, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot;EdwardsBot (talk) 03:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 May newsletter
We are half way through round 3, with a little under a month to go. The current overall leader is, who has 570 points. He leads pool C. Pools A, B and D are led by, and respectively. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Two of last year's final 8, and, have dropped out of the competition, saying they would rather their place went to someone who will have more time on their hands than them next round. On a related note, a special thank you goes to for his help behind the scenes once again. There is currently a problem with the poster, perhaps caused by the new skin- take a look atthis discussion and see if you can help. The competition has continued to tick over well with minimal need for judge intervention, so thank you to everyone making that possible. Good luck to all! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 20:48, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot;EdwardsBot (talk) 21:53, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:54, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for List of deaths of candidates during general elections of the United Kingdom
Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot;EdwardsBot (talk) 11:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot;EdwardsBot (talk) 20:25, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot;EdwardsBot (talk) 18:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eleanor Tennant
A tag has been placed on Eleanor Tennant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag -if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedydeletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfythe page or have a copy emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot;EdwardsBot (talk) 21:11, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 June newsletter
We're half way through 2010, and the end of the WikiCup is in sight! Round 3 is over, and we're down to our final 16. Our pool winners were (A),  (B, and the round's overall leader),  (C)  and (D, joint), but, with the scores reset, everything is to play for in our last pooled round. The pools will be up before midnight tonight, and have been selected randomly by J Milburn. This will be the toughest round yet, and so, as ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Though unaffiliated with the WikiCup, July sees the third Great Wikipedia Dramaout- a project with not dissimilar goals to the WikiCup. Everyone is welcome to take part and do their bit to contribute to the encyclopedia itself.

If you're interested in the scores for the last round of the Cup, please take a look at WikiCup/History/2010/Round 3and WikiCup/History/2010/Full/Round 3. Our thanks go to for compiling these. As was predicted, Group C ended up the "Group of Death", with 670 points required for second place, and, therefore, automatic promotion. This round will probably be even tougher- again, the top two from each of the two groups will make it through, while the twelve remaining participants will compete for four wildcard places- good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot;EdwardsBot (talk) 15:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:38, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot;EdwardsBot (talk) 20:35, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot;EdwardsBot (talk) 15:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brownism
A tag has been placed on Brownism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Marcus  Qwertyus   00:16, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * There is a userspace draft you could merge this to at User:Thehelpinghand/Brownism. Marcus   Qwertyus   00:18, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Would you settle for a soft redirect to the Wiktionary entry. Marcus   Qwertyus  01:14, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No. Given how eager people are to delete the article I will do my best to have it saved Francium12  22:41, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Graduate tax
 — Rlevse • Talk • 18:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tory Bear (blogger)
A tag has been placed on Tory Bear (blogger) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Marcus Qwertyus   21:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot;EdwardsBot (talk) 03:04, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Art of Speech


The article The Art of Speech has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Album does not yet exist, and artist's page only notes that it is currently being written. Violation of WP:CRYSTAL andWP:HAMMER.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop theproposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. D OOMSDAYER 520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:56, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of The Art of Speech
I have nominated The Art of Speech, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Art of Speech. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. D OOMSDAYER 520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:16, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 July newsletter
We are half-way through our penultimate round, and nothing is yet certain. Pool A, currently led by has ended up the more competitive, with three contestants (, and) scoring over 500 points already. Pool B is led by, who has also scored well over 500. The top two from each pool, as well as the next four highest scorers regardless of pool, will make it through to our final eight. As ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome atWikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Planning has begun for the 2011 WikiCup, with open discussions concerning scoring and flags for next year's competition. Contributions to those discussions would be appreciated, especially concerning the flags, as next year's signups cannot begin until the flag issue has been resolved. Signups will hopefully open at some point in this round, with discussion about possible changing in the scoring/process opening some time afterwards.

Earlier this round, we said goodbye to, who has bowed out to spend more time on the book he is authoring with his wife. We wish him all the best. In other news, the start of this round also saw some WikiCup awards sent out by. We appreciate his enthusiasm, and contestants are of course welcome to award each other prizes as they see fit, but rest assured that we will be sending out "official" awards at the end of the competition. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed1722:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot;EdwardsBot (talk) 23:04, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot;EdwardsBot (talk) 00:29, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anders Gravers Pedersen


The article Anders Gravers Pedersen has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, allbiographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Courcelles 22:53, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I've requested deletion of the article Francium12  00:59, 12 August 2010 (UTC)