User talk:Vanished user sojweiorj34i4f/Archive 7

Break
user:francium12 is a bit frustrated with the Wikipedia project and is taking a bit of a Wikibreak. Might be back in the future sometime. Francium12 04:30, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 August 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 08:07, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 August 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 20:04, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Tennis_statistics
A proposal has been put forward to replace Tennis statistics with User:Fyunck(click)/SandboxTennisStats and name it List of non-Grand Slam tennis statistics and records. Thoughts, comments and/or votes are encouraged.  SilkTork  *YES! 08:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 15:15, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Postinternationalism
I have nominated Postinternationalism, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Postinternationalism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Nole  lover  21:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 August newsletter
We have our final eight! The best of luck to those who remain. A bumper newsletter this week as we start our home straight.


 * Pool A's winner was . Awarded the top score overall this round, Sturmvogel_66 writes primarily on military history, favouring Naval warfare.
 * Pool B's winner was . Awarded the top score for featured articles this round, Casliber writes primarily on natural sciences, especially botany and ornithology.
 * Pool A's close second was . Awarded the top score for featured pictures this round, Sasata writes primarily on natural sciences, favouring mycology.
 * Pool B's close second was . Awarded the top score for good articles and topics this round, ThinkBlue primarily writes content related to television and film, including 30 Rock.
 * The first wildcard was . Awarded the top score for did you knows and valued pictures this round, TonyTheTiger writes on a number of topics, including baseball, American football and Chicago.
 * The second wildcard was . Someone who has helped the Cup behind the scenes all year, White Shadows said "I'm still in shock that I made it this far" and writes primarily on Naval warfare, especially U-boats.
 * The third wildcard was . Awarded the top score for featured lists and topics this round, Staxringold primarily writes on sport and television, including baseball and 30 Rock.
 * The fourth wildcard was . Entering the final eight only on the final day of the round, William S. Saturn writes on a number of topics, mostly related to Texas.

We say goodbye to the six who fell at the final hurdle. only just missed out on a place in the final eight. was not far behind. was awarded top points for in the news this round. contributed a variety of did you know articles. said "I'm surprised to have survived so far into the competition", but was extactic to see Finland in the semi-finals. did not score this round, but has scored highly in previous rounds. We also say goodbye to, who withdrew earlier this month after spending six weeks overseas. Anyone interested in this round's results can see them hereand here. Thank you to for these.

Signups for next year's competition are now open. Planning is ongoing, with a key discussion about judges for next year open. Discussion about how next year's scoring will work is ongoing, and thoughts are more than welcome at Wikipedia talk:WikiCup/Scoring. Also, TonyTheTiger is compiling some information and statistics on the finalists here- the final eight are encouraged to add themselves to the list.

Our final eight will play it out for two months, after which we will know 2010's WikiCup winner, and a variety of prizes will be awarded. As ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Foxand The ed17 23:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 22:49, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Irish Poor Laws
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Irish Poor Laws, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from at least http://www.history.ac.uk/ihr/Focus/welfare/articles/crossmanv.html andhttp://www.workhouses.org.uk/index.html?Ireland/Ireland.shtml andhttp://www.proni.gov.uk/index/exhibitions_talks_and_events/19th_century_emigration_to_the_north_america_online/helping_hands/the_irish_poor_law.htmand http://www.askaboutireland.ie/reading-room/history-heritage/poor-law-union/poor-law-unions-and-their/the-union/, and therefore acopyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blockedfrom editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details atTalk:Irish Poor Laws and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Irish Poor Laws, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Irish Poor Laws with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Irish Poor Laws. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Irish Poor Laws saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!VernoWhitney (talk) 13:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Above is the standard notice template. I am aware that the article is not copied exactly, but a large portion of your additions to the article (beginning here) closely paraphrase the copyrighted sources you use and so much of the material you added appears to constitute derivative works which are a problem under our copyright policy. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I have no idea what concern about close paraphrasing the orginal tagger was concerned about as they didn't leave any message on the talk page of the article. If I stray too far from what the sources state I will only get accussed of original research and/or synthesis :-( Francium12  15:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't know what concern they had either, but I investigated the article because of that tagging and I did compare the article to the sources, which is why I went ahead and blanked it as containing copyright violations. You can use the facts from the sources (and in so doing avoid original research), but you cannot use the same structure and language as the sources to present those facts.VernoWhitney (talk) 17:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately over the next few weeks I am going to be busy in real life so it looks as If this article is heading for deletion then. Francium12  17:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The article shouldn't be deleted, it will either be rolled back to the last clean version or the problematic material will be rewriten/removed individually depending on the time available to the reviewing admin. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Perhaps User talk:Shubinator should be contacted to clarify his/her concerns. I'm also temporarily 'tied up' and away from my sources on this topic, but should be in a position to spend some time on the article next week.RashersTierney (talk) 19:34, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:25, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Rescue
Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:09, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 September 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 19:27, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Harwichlogo.GIF
 Thanks for uploadingFile:Harwichlogo.GIF. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of University of Bristol admissions controversy
The article University of Bristol admissions controversy you nominated as a good articlehas been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:University of Bristol admissions controversy for things which need to be addressed.Jezhotwells (talk) 20:18, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Spot-fixing DYK

 * Thanks for the double-nom! Shiva (Visnu)  19:07, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 September 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 22:00, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sex Among Allies


The article Sex Among Allies has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop theproposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 21:03, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 September newsletter
We are half-way through our final round, entering the home straight. leads at the time of writing with 1180 points, immediately followed by with 1175 points. closely follows in third place with 1100 points. For those who are interested, data about the finalists has been compiled at WikiCup/History/2010/finalists, while a list of content submitted by all WikiCup contestants prior to this round has been compiled at WikiCup/History/2010/Submissions. As ever, anything contestants worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on theWikiCup talk page.

Despite controversy, the WikiCup remains open. Signups for next year's competition are more than welcome, and suggestions for how next year's competition will work are appreciated at Wikipedia talk:WikiCup/Scoring. More general comments and discussions should be directed at the WikiCup talk page. One month remains in the 2010 WikiCup, after which we will know our champion. Good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Foxand The ed17 23:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 October 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Mills High School


A tag has been placed on Thomas Mills High School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

the page needs more info to be of use

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administratoruserfy the page or email a copy to you. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 17:57, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:00, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 October 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 06:51, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 October 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:37, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Devil's Tune


The article The Devil's Tune has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable per WP:BK

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop theproposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:00, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of The Devil's Tune for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article The Devil's Tune, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Devil's Tune until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting(talk) - 23:34, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 October 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scientific Man versus Power Politics


The article Scientific Man versus Power Politics has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Nothing here to establish WP:notability. No references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop theproposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 18:11, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Idealism (international relations)
I *think* you were trying a copy and paste move to undo a redirect, but that can't be done that way. The article would need to be moved to preserve its history (a requirement, see Text of the GNU Free Documentation License); besides, you might need some consensus from editor, on the talk page. I urge you to consider starting a discussion to rename the article, and then getting an administrator to move the article over the redirect. In the meantime, I have reverted the moves to preserve the histories in the proper way; should an admin, for instance, think that I erred in this, I gladly stand corrected. Thanks, Drmies(talk) 01:10, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Daniel Cooper.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Daniel Cooper.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 October newsletter
The 2010 WikiCup is over! It has been a long journey, but what has been achieved is impressive: combined, participants have produced over seventy featured articles, over five hundred good articles, over fifty featured lists, over one thousand one hundred "did you know" entries, in addition to various other pieces of recognised content. A full list (which has yet to be updated to reflect the scores in the final round) can be found here. Perhaps more importantly, we have our winner! The 2010 WikiCup champion is, with an unbelievable 4220 points in the final round. Second place goes to, with 2260, and third to, with 560. Congratulations to our other four finalists –,, and. Also, congratulations to, who withdrew from the competition with an impressive 2685 points earlier in this round.

Prizes will also be going to those who claimed the most points for different types of content in a single round. It was decided that the prizes would be awarded for those with the highest in a round, rather than overall, so that the finalists did not have an unfair advantage. Winning the featured article prize is, for five featured articles in round 4. Winning the good article prize is, for eighty-one good articles in round 5. Winning the featured list prize is, for six featured lists in round 1. Winning the picture and sound award is, for four featured pictures in round 3. Winning the topic award is, for forty-seven articles in various good topics in round 5. Winning the "did you know" award is, for over one hundred did you knows is round 5. Finally, winning the in the news award is, for nineteen articles in the news in round three.

The WikiCup has faced criticism in the last month – hopefully, we will take something positive from it and create a better contest for next year. Like Wikipedia itself, the Cup is a work in progress, and ideas for how it should work are more than welcome on the WikiCup talk page and on the scoring talk page. Also, people are more than welcome to sign up for next year's competition on the signup page. Well done and thank you to everyone involved – the Cup has been a pleasure to run, and we, as judges, have been proud to be a part of it. We hope that next year, however the Cup is working, and whoever is running it, it will be back, stronger and more popular than ever. Until then, goodbye and happy editing! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 03:04, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:43, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 November 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:55, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 November 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:21, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 November 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

JImmy Wales event in Bristol.
Hi, I thought that you might be interested in WT:WikiProject Bristol. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 20:59, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Beauchamps School
An article that you have been involved in editing, Beauchamps School, has been proposed for amerge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. — Half  Price  22:16, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 December 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 December 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:46, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:49, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nick the Flying Brick


The article Nick the Flying Brick has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:POLITICIAN. Has been a candidate in a number of elections but doesn't seem to have "received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources".

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop theproposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adambro (talk) 14:46, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Nick the Flying Brick for deletion
The article Nick the Flying Brick is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nick the Flying Brick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Adambro (talk) 14:16, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 December 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:51, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 12:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011
Hello. You are being contacted because you have previously shown interest in the WikiCup but have not yet signed up for the 2011 WikiCup, which starts at midnight. It is not too late to sign up! The competition will remain open until at least January 31, and so it is not too late to enter. If you are interested, simply follow the instructions to add your username to the signup page, and a judge will contact you as soon as possible with an explanation of how to participate. The WikiCup is a friendly competition open to all Wikipedians, old and new, experienced and inexperienced, providing a fun and rewarding way to contribute quality content to Wikipedia. If you do not want to receive any further messages about the WikiCup, or you want to start receiving messages about the WikiCup, you may add or remove your name fromWikiCup/Newsletter/Send. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the WikiCup talk page or contact the judges directly. J Milburn and The ed17 06:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 January 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:28, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Georg Sørensen


A tag has been placed on Georg Sørensen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedydeletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zachlipton(talk) 04:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

No wonder our coverage of international relation is so poor :-( Francium12  05:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:04, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 18:41, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 January 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! (also, how the hells did you not have it before?) Ironholds (talk) 09:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations on gaining adminship Ironholds! I lost autopatrolled when I was created an uncontroversial unreferenced BLP (!) about a year ago having only saved the article to go in search of an off-line reference. I'll try my best not to lose it again! Francium12 11:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 January newsletter
We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. Signups are now closed, and we have 129 listed competitors, 64 of whom will make it to round two. Congratulations to, who, at the time of writing, has a comfortable lead with 228 points, followed by , with 144 points. Four others have over 100 points. Congratulations also go to, who scored the first points in the competition, claiming for Talk:Hurricane King/GA1, , who scored the first non-review points in the competition, claiming for Dognapping, and who was the first in the competition to use our new "multiplier" mechanic (explanation), claiming for Grigory Potemkin, a subject covered on numerous Wikipedias. Thanks must also go to Jarry1250 for dealing with all bot work- without you, the competition wouldn't be happening!

A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round two is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself fromWikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 22:32, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:41, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Added template for SuggestBot
Hi,

Thanks for being one of SuggestBot's users! I hope you have found the bot's suggestions useful.

We are in the process of switching from our previous list-based signup process to using templates and userboxes, and I have therefore added the appropriate template to your user talk page. You should receive the first set of suggestions within a day, and since we'll be automating SuggestBot you will from then on continue to receive them regularly at the desired frequency.

We now also have a userbox that you can use to let others know you're using SuggestBot, and if you don't want to clutter your user talk page the bot can post to a sub-page in your userspace. More information about the userbox and usage of the template is available on User:SuggestBot/Getting Recommendations Regularly.

If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my user talk page. Thanks again,Nettrom (talk) 16:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 February 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:17, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 February 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 February 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 17:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 February newsletter
So begins round two of the WikiCup! We now have eight pools, each with eight random contestants. This round will continue until the end of April, when the top two of each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers of those remaining, will make it to round three. Congratulations to (first, with 487 points) and (second, with 459), who stormed the first round. finished third with 223. Twelve others finished with over 100 points- well done to all of you! The final standings in round one can be seen here. A mere 8 points were required to reach round two; competition will no doubt be much more fierce this round, so be ready for a challenge! A special thanks goes, again, to for dealing with all bot work. This year's bot, as well as running smoothly, is doing some very helpful things that last year's did not. Also, thanks to for some helpful behind-the-scenes updating and number crunching.

Some news for those who are interested- March will see a GAN backlog elimination drive, which you are still free to join. Organised by WikiProject Good articles, the drive aims to minimise the GAN backlog and offers prizes to those who help out. Of course, you may well be able to claim WikiCup points for the articles you review as part of the drive. Also ongoing is the Great Backlog Drive, looking to work on clearing all of the backlogs on Wikipedia; again, incentives are offered, and the spirit of friendly competition is alive, while helping the encyclopedia is the ultimate aim. Though unrelated to the WikiCup, these may well be of interest to some of you.

Just a reminder of the rules; if you have done significant work on content this year and it is promoted in this round, you may claim for it. Also, anything that was promoted after the end of round one but before the beginning of round two may be claimed for in round two. Details of the rules can be found on this page. For those interested in statistics, a running total of claims can be seen here, and a very interesting table of that information (along with the highest scorers in each category) can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome onWikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself fromWikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:41, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot(talk) 10:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 March 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 March 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Evening Echo (Essex)


The article Evening Echo (Essex) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Empty article, basically; only one source, the paper's own website.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop theproposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy (Help!) 11:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 March 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:51, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 March newsletter
We are half way through round two of the WikiCup, which will end on 28 April. Of the 64 current contestants, 32 will make it through to the next round; the two highest in each pool, and the 16 next highest scorers. At the time of writing, our current overall leader is with 231 points, who leads Pool H. (Pool G) also has over 200 points, while 9 others (three of whom are in Pool D) have over 100 points. Remember that certain content (specifically, articles/portals included in at least 20 Wikipedias as of 31 December 2010 or articles which are considered "vital") is worth double points if promoted to good or featured status, or if it appears on the main page in the Did You Know column. There were some articles last round which were eligible for double points, but which were not claimed for. For more details, see WikiCup/Scoring.

A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round three is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself fromWikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:56, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot(talk) 12:40, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:45, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Rita Floyd
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents ofRita Floyd, and it appears to include material copied directly fromhttp://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/staff/floyd/publications.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See ourcopyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:58, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rita Floyd


A tag has been placed on Rita Floyd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clearcopyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <b style="color:brown;">Mobile</b><b style="color:blue;">Snail</b> 01:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 April 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page&middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 09:34, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stop the Islamisation of Denmark


The article Stop the Islamisation of Denmark has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Organisation not notable. No sources for notability. I know the danish context well and this organization is not one of the important organizaionts involved in the anti-Islam debate - I don't think finding reliable thirdparty sources will be possible.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop theproposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ·Maunus· ƛ · 15:09, 14 April 2011 (UTC)