User talk:Vanished user sojweiorj34i4f/Archive 9

The Signpost: 01 August 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot;Unsubscribe&middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:52, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

==Speedy deletion nomination of Yrjö Aaltonen==

A tag has been placed on Yrjö Aaltonen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit thethe page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contactone of these administratorsto request that the administratoruserfythe page or email a copy to you. undefined — Bill william compton Talk   13:44, 3 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Created as part of a Wikipedia project combating systemic bias. How ironic that it is going to be deleted Francium12 13:48, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 August 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot;Single-page &middot;Unsubscribe&middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:21, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Causes of the 2011 England riotsfor deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Causes of the 2011 England riots is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Causes of the 2011 England riots until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cerejota (talk) 04:28, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Sally Bercow for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sally Bercowis suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sally Bercow until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crisis. E X  E   20:56, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Plume School


A tag has been placed on Plume School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source ofsentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will beblocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained atDonating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look atWikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a questionhere.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visitthe page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Epeefleche (talk) 20:39, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Glasgow School of Art Students' Association for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glasgow School of Art Students' Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Glasgow School of Art Students' Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 02:56, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Life Will Be the Death of Me for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Life Will Be the Death of Me is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Life Will Be the Death of Me until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)