User talk:Vanished user~34r123

' Welcome!'

Hello, Pixiemasters, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Charlie the drunk guinea pig, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  ttonyb (talk) 04:02, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Charlie the drunk guinea pig


A tag has been placed on Charlie the drunk guinea pig requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 04:02, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

I know

Drew Harris 01:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC)User: Pixiemasters

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin Brueck


A tag has been placed on Kevin Brueck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ➜Gƒoley Four   (GSV)  01:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bobjenz


A tag has been placed on Bobjenz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. andy (talk) 01:21, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. andy (talk) 01:22, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin Brueck


A tag has been placed on Kevin Brueck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 01:29, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bobjenz


A tag has been placed on Bobjenz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 01:31, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 01:32, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Article creation
Please refer to Starting_an_article and Your first article for information on starting an article for publication on Wikipedia. Thank you. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 01:37, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin Brueck


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ➜Gƒoley Four   (GSV)  02:29, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ➜Gƒoley Four   (GSV)  02:30, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Help channel
If you need more help please go here, type in a nickname, and ask your question. ➜Gƒoley Four   (GSV)  03:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Incidentally
Hi, Pixiemasters, you'll likely not be pleased about this but I have suppressed a number of edits to your userspace which reveal too much personally identifiable information about yourself. I've done this per policy and for your own protection and safety on-line as you are a self-declared minor. I'm really sorry about that and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add it. For some useful information on privacy and safety, take a look at Guidance for younger editors. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages - Risker (talk) 02:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Writing articles
Try going here. It helps you create an article. When you get to step 6 click on the top button. Cheers, → ♠ Gƒoley Four ♠ ← 04:54, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

help
Can someone help me create daneboe, bobjenz, and kevin brueck?


 * Hi there, I see you're having some trouble. Could you briefly explain to me here who these people are and why they are notable? -- &oelig; &trade; 05:17, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

they voice the annoying orange! acually, they voice characters on the annoying orange!

Drew Harris 05:24, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[[User: Pixiemasters


 * Ahh The Annoying Orange. I see. Well, Wikipedia is not easy.. there is a lot of reading and learning you must do before you can effectively create an article. Considering your skill level perhaps you may want to experiment a bit first in the Sandbox, afterwards, read the WP:Tutorial, followed by WP:Your first article, then give the Article wizard a try. If you still need help, try posting at the Help desk. Regards, &oelig; &trade; 05:30, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin brueck


A tag has been placed on Kevin brueck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kudpung (talk) 05:13, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bobjenz


A tag has been placed on Bobjenz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Lear's Fool 05:16, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

This is your only warning. If you create an inappropriate page again, you will be '''blocked from editing without further notice. Seven nonsense pages is enough.Kudpung (talk) 05:19, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Charlie the drunk guinea pig
 * Bobjenz x 2
 * Kevin Brueck x 3
 * and now Kevin brueck

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 05:30, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi everybody. See above response to Ol English. They voice The Annoying Orange. So they are not nonsense articles but non notable folks who do YouTube videos. -- Diannaa (Talk) 05:33, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The block is not for article titles, but for their content (examples: articles with the only phrase "kevin brueck (born    ) is a" or "bobjenz (born   ) is") and other edits like   . They are more of incompetence than blatant vandalism, and most important here rather reluctance to stop after numerous warnings (the quoted examples were last). Materialscientist (talk) 05:21, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for the clarification. I suspect the user is very young. -- Diannaa (Talk) 03:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

unblock return
yes, i know the unblock request above this text is already declined, i just resubmitted it so i could edit it

Drew Harris (talk) 23:54, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Don't remove declined appeals. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 00:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

how would we be able to edit the request and then suddenly, someone is alreading answering it?

Drew Harris (talk) 00:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)


 * You can use the "Show preview" button to review your statement before it gets posted; this reduces the number of edit conflicts you'll encounter. IN any event, nothing you added is material to your unblock appeal, and I doubt any administrator will be willing to unblock you until you follow the fairly standard instructions left by Beeblebrox. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 00:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

redid it again. ready for proposal. despite the fact that i don't have much advanced experience, i can still help wiki. Drew Harris (talk) 00:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

please? i have regained my maturity and responsibility!

 * I suggest to everyone that let us all give User:Pixiemasters a final chance this time by which they can contribute to Wikipedia as they are promising and they be constantly monitored so that everything goes smoothly. I recommend that let this be the only last chance so that Pixiemasters get to improve themselves and Wikipedia too and if things go wrong then its an indefinite block permanently. Administrator's let's consider this as their only last as they have themselves promised. Thanks. TheGeneralUser (talk) 20:10, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

thank you general user. i am sure that i can do the best outta everything. if i win, can u give me a list of things needing improvement? Drew Harris (talk) 20:35, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * There is no such thing as winning or losing here. I strongly suggest that you re-read all the reasons given above in your previously declined unblock requests and clearly demonstrate that you want to help the project. And before you would go and start improving any articles, i think you really should join a Adopt-a-user program which will help you guide and learn the basics of editing and using Wikipedia. Hope that helps. Thank you. TheGeneralUser (talk) 21:22, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

ahem. srry for saying that. i meant to say if the request works. anyway, thanks for the consideration. i will definitely take the advice and join.Drew Harris (talk) 21:35, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Good to hear that, no problem :). I can put up the template on your user page, what do you say ? It will help in finding the adopter as soon as possible. TheGeneralUser (talk) 21:45, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Help: i need help putting on the adoption template! sos Drew Harris (talk) 21:41, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

nvm i got how to put the template on now :) ill tell u my adoption coach in a minute Drew Harris (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have put up the adoption template on your user page, there is no need to put it on user talk page so i am removing it. Thanks. TheGeneralUser (talk) 21:52, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

i choose user: bernstein2291 Drew Harris (talk) 21:52, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * That's okay, but you need to hold off until you get unblocked and do not add the adoption template on your user talk page again which i had removed, it is not required here, just on user page. Thank you. TheGeneralUser (talk) 21:57, 27 May 2012 (UTC)


 * To be quite honest, all of this "i would be back to unblocked, i would get a plate of cookies, and then i would work my way to reviewer, then to an administrator" stuff just sounds to me like a kid who really isn't mature enough to work here - and I no signs of understanding anything that the various unblock reviewers have been saying. I would oppose any unblock unless one of the following two things happens...
 * Pixiemasters/Drew Harris follows Beeblebrox's 2nd chance suggestion, above, and demonstrates the ability to make a useful edit here on this Talk page.
 * Pixiemasters/Drew Harris is accepted by a mentor, and agrees to follow that mentor's guidance strictly.
 * -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:09, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I completely agree with User:Boing! said Zebedee. Saying things like this doubt us all on your intentions to contribute to the project. Just forget about becoming a reviewer or an administrator or anything like that. Right now and for the coming time you need to focus on becoming a positive contributor to Wikipedia and focus on helping the project. Until and unless you agree and finalize on all the terms and conditions given above to you by User:Beeblebrox, User:Boing! said Zebedee, by me and other users and administrators you will not be unblocked. So that's why you need to make a responsible decision first before getting unblocked (if possible). TheGeneralUser (talk) 22:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

you know what guys? i agree with all of you. i will just do hard work on wikipedia so that i can be a great wikipedian so that i could bbe trusted by others. That's what its saying on the request. Can you please approve or decline the request?Drew Harris (talk) 22:49, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * More vague promises is not the path to being unblocked. In the time since I explained how to get a second chance, you have been pointed back to my remarks three or four times, yet I see no effort whatsoever towards following the process outloned there. It is time to put up or shut up. I will post the instructions again here, follow them, or stop requesting unblock. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:43, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
 * Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
 * Read our guide to improving articles
 * Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
 * If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
 * Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
 * Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
 * do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:  );
 * do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this:  Name.jpg </tt>);
 * do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: <tt> </tt>);
 * do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: <tt> </tt>);
 * Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: ) the copied content but do not save yet ;
 * Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "<tt>Copied content from [ [exact Name of Article]] ; see that article's history for attribution.</tt>"
 * You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), place at the end of the prose you copied this template   and then save.


 * Now, edit that content to propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
 * When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
 * If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "<tt></tt>" to your talk page. Thank you.

I have resigned my maturity in order to provide you with a cookie
aok. as long as there's cookies, its ok. Drew Harris (talk) 19:58, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Adoption
Hello Pixiemasters! I see that you have been blocked from editing because of the repeated recreation of inappropriate pages - and that someone has recommended adoption to you! It's pretty sad to see you blocked, but no worries! I am willing to teach you about the ins and outs of Wikipedia, and what Wikipedia is and isn't. Study seriously, and you can end up being one of the encyclopedia's most prolific editors. I'll be happy to adopt you because I enjoy working with others – especially to help them become a better editor on Wikipedia!

Take a look at my edit history; I usually work at Articles for Deletion, Articles for Creation, in new page patrolling, and in vandalism-fighting. I have been an editor on Wikipedia for a year, and have made over 15,000 edits to the encyclopedia.

I'm usually available on Wikipedia from 0:00 - 5:00 and occasionally from 12:00-16:00 (all times UTC). I travel frequently, usually on business trips around the world. I'm so young, yet so busy.

If I adopt you, I promise I will provide you with the most friendly, easy, and convenient adoption service through my adoption school. If you think I am the right a dopter for you, we shall get started now! →<font face="Segoe Script"><font color="#F52887">B <font color="#348017">music <font color="#3BB9FF">ian 09:52, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! I automatically accept your offer. Before you offered me, i was reviewing the what wikipedia is and not and other advice pages, so im arleady in a head start. I know that you will teach me more, but at least i came to you with some knowledge:) can you also gime me pst times for when ur on? I dont really understand utc that much. I also have an account on wikia called drewiestewie and it hasnt been used much yet, but the improvements will havven soon. Drew Harris (talk) 04:36, 31 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Might I suggest that the first thing you work on is getting Pixiemasters to follow the instructions in the 2ndchance template which I and several other administrators have referred to when declining to unblock this user? Getting an adopter is a good step, but before this account is unblocked a display of good faith to demonstrate that this is not a waste of time is still in order. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

I know. I will answer those questions later,but will print the words so that i can remember the excact words. I wont resubmit yet, considering im busy throughout the day. Drewiestewie (talk) 04:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Well that's just sad. Despite having had nine months to review those instructions, this remark makes it clear that you have not even read them yet. If you are trying to prove you can listen and learn, you are not doing a very good job at all right now. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

actually, i am reading and TRYING to say your instructions, but it doesn't go well wien I'm trying to do it. i also take breaks from requests time after time. understand why it sometimes takes time? sometimes, words aren't that powerful enough to work. right? it happens to everyone who proposes stuff. [User:Pixiemasters|Drewiestewie]] (talk) 05:56, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The instructions on the 2ndchance template are simple: go to any page (click here for a random page) and copy and paste its source to the bottom of this page. After doing so, propose some edits to the article by editing your own copy: no minor typo fixtures/small unreferenced edits, what an admin is looking for are substantial edits that reflect established policy and guidelines. Like let's say you would like to improve the article The Annoying Orange. Copy and paste its source to your talk page, and get started. (Any article can work.) Thanks, →<font face="Segoe Script"><font color="#F52887">B <font color="#348017">music <font color="#3BB9FF">ian 06:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok! Ill start tommorow due to my business throughout the day, Drewiestewie (talk) 14:40, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

New signature
My signature is now drewiestewie. Thank you. Drewiestewie (talk) 04:42, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

this time, for real.
But you haven't done the 2nd chance work! You have to do that here on your talk page before you get unblocked! Do you really not understand that after having been told multiple times? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:47, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok. you are now familiar with the policy, why not choose an article you like to improve, copy it over here and improve so we can see what you would do to the article.—<font color=green face=Neuropol>cyberpower <font color=olive face=arnprior>Chat <sub style="margin-left:-3.7ex"><font color=olive face=arnprior>Online 00:22, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

ok, will do in a minute. first, I'm hungry. will brb at 6:45-7:00 pm pst. Drewiestewie (talk) 01:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm beginning  to  believe that  there is a maturity issue here and that  WP:CIR is needed before much  improvement  can be expected. I'll  be happy  to  be proven otherwise. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The standard remedy for maturity (this goes to you Pixiemasters) is to wait. No-one seems to realize the amount of maturity that can be gained over the course of a full year or two - leading me to suggest a wait of at least one year before attempting a comeback.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Amen. Max Semenik (talk) 08:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Full Protection: Oh my gosh. I didn't realize I was just evading right there. Sorry. Please indefinitely fully protect this page until I get unblocked in order to prevent further evasion. Instead, I will actually use the unblock ticket request system. Sorry! Won't happen again. 76.220.66.126 (talk) 09:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

WrestleMania Challenges
The WWE has put on challenges that the winners will receive free tickets to WrestleMania XXX. In those challenges, the challenger has to do a specific thing, and they would win either tickets to WrestleMania XXX or any other type of sweepstakes. A couple of these challenges include:

WrestleMania XXX Moment: This challenge was contested on the WWE 2K14 servers. In this challenge, you had to go onto the WrestleMania XXX Moment chapter on the 30 Years of WrestleMania mode and choose a match to play out of. You would then play the match and during the match, you would have to save a screenshot of a moment your liked during the match, and then you would send the photo to 2K. The challenge was contest between October 29 until January 9. The top ten photos would be sent an email and they would post it onto the WWE 2K14 online servers. The top ten photos would then be voted by the general public. The winner would receive free airfare, hotel reservations, and two free tickets to WrestleMania XXX. As of yet, the winner is still being decided.

WrestleMania XXX Reading Challenge: In this challenge, children between the ages of four-eighteen would choose from a list of reading buddies, including Daniel Bryan, A. J. Lee, The Bella Twins, Dolph Ziggler, Rey Mysterio, Big Show, amongst others. They would then read from a wide selection of books, and when they finished the book, they would enter the competition and be entered for sweepstakes, including a WWE Superstar visiting their school, a wide selection of books being given to their school library, or two free tickets to WrestleMania XXX. The competition is still being held, running from January 17 until March 7.

I don't have sources for this, which I will only be doing on the actual articles.

Unblock and clean start request for 2018

 * Uninvolved Comment While this was a good block, I also think an unblock so that the editor can CLEANSTART under account DrewieStewie would be warranted. I don't have any editing history with Drewiestewie / Pixiemasters, however, based solely on their explanation of events I think it would a bit gothic for us to penalize them for a transgression that occurred when they were nine (!) years old (i.e. ). Because blocks are protective, rather than punitive, I don't see a good reason to continue it in light of the explanation given and time passed. I'd also like to add it's very impressive and a testament to their maturity that they disclosed their previous account of their own volition; it would have been far easier for them to simply have not acknowledged it and continued editing. Based on this fact alone I think Drewiestewie / Pixiemasters has demonstrated the potential to be a very productive editor and it would be a shame, and a net loss to WP, if we discouraged them. The way they handled this shows a comportment beyond their years, in my opinion. Chetsford (talk) 00:13, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I am inclined to grant this unblock request but I do have some concerns about the notion of a clean start under the other account name. That account is not "clean" because it has been used to evade a block for four years. I think a completely new account would be best, but I am willing to listen to the input of other administrators. <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  00:56, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I have requested additional input at WP:AN. <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  01:05, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * They were evading the block until today: our normal response is to block and say come back in 6 months. On the flip-side, we wouldn’t have known unless they told us. I’m generally very unforgiving on socking until there have been 6 months with no socks, and that’s my inclination here, but I also understand the other view. I’d decline per the sock policy, but I could also see a reasonable IAR argument. Not sure if this is much help, Cullen. I might also ping a CU on this to see if there are other accounts. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:32, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

I mean, there is that, but I feel the account is otherwise clean when not putting that into account. Plus, there was no malicious intent with creating that account. Plus, I am already extended autoconfirmed (over a year and 500 edits), so why restart that process now over this if it’s otherwise clean and in good faith besides that policy violation that I have profusely apologized for? That’s my main concern, and I appreciate everybody’s input. :) Drewiestewie (talk) 01:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Oppose unblock. You can't possibly claim you respect our rules if you've been continuously breaking them for the past 4 years. User:DrewieStewie is evidence not of a triumph of rehabilitation, but of disregard for our community and its norms. Max Semenik (talk) 04:49, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I do respect the rules. I’ve only broken that rule, not any others. All other signs point to me being a constructive, well intending, productive editor. And just because I broke it doesn’t mean I don’t regret or remorse breaking it and don’t respect it. Myself, along with at least one other, believe that granting an unblock would do more benefit than harm to the community. Thank you for your input though. :) Drewiestewie (talk) 05:24, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

I personally see the block as more of a punishment than preventative. I looked at DrewieStewie and didn't see any major wrongdoing on that account except for the block evasion. So to me the DrewieStewie account shows me the user wants to make good faith contributions to wikipedia but it also shows they have recently used socks to evade their block. But I think coming clean about it shows they will most likely won't do it again. Also I don't believe we should punish people who come clean when they were never accused of anything. Afootpluto (talk) 10:07, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Pinging : Any thoughts? Alex Shih (talk) 14:35, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, since you asked... personally I'm curious as to what prompted this sudden need to confess. A quiet return isn't something I'm a fan of, but at least it doesn't disrupt Wikipedia - this does; witness the number of editors who have already become involved.
 * Block evasion isn't something we should encourage. Unblocking here kind of sends the message that it's okay to evade a block if you don't get caught, which doesn't sit comfortably with me at all. That said, DrewieStewie hasn't been a particularly problematic user, and wouldn't be blocked if it weren't for the evasion - they have shown that they can avoid the behaviour that led to the initial block. I'm therefore tentatively in favour of unblocking, but I'm not at all happy about it. Yunshui <sup style="font-size:90%">雲 <sub style="font-size:90%">水 14:51, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Very good, respectable points, Yunshui I just felt the confession was necessary as I felt I couldn’t be an honest, trustworthy Wikipedian without confessing sooner or later. I also wanted to repent for my Wikipedia sins, so to speak. The goal here on my part isn’t to encourage block evasion without getting caught. The message I am sending is to take responsibility for your actions and come clean and be honest if you did something like this and respectfully, apologetically, and candorly handle the situation to ultimately make it better for everybody and come together and do what we came here to do: construct an encyclopedia. :) Drewiestewie (talk) 15:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Support unblock (per WP:NOTBURO if you like). Yes, technically this was block evasion. But Drewiestewie could simply have kept quiet and never been noticed, and I think honesty should be rewarded rather than punished - and I see no complaints about their actual edits, and so nothing that needs to be prevented. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Support per Boing!. There could be an argument made that keeping them blocked (until an appeal in ~6 months) would in general deter block evasion, but for Drewiestewie it'd essentially be a punitive punishment block, so unblock.. Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:30, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Obviously unblock. Why is this even being discussed? Here is someone who when he was a child did some stuff which was immature and unsuitable for Wikipedia. When he was still a child, though a rather older one, he started evading the block. He is now pretty well adult, he has totally different attitudes, and is able to contribute as a constructive editor. Among the change in attitude he is no longer happy to be editing dishonestly, and has come clean about his childhood history. Keeping the account blocked would not prevent any future repetition of the problems which took place 8 years ago, and would be purely punitive. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:33, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Another voice for unblocking. has stated at WP:AN that he or she would support an unblock. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Obviously I will be unblocking Drewiestewie. But do you wish to move this account and the Drewiestewie accounts to obscure names so you can start over with a fresh Drewiestewie?— CYBERPOWER  ( Chat ) 15:20, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * My only concern with that is that I’m already extended autoconfirmed on DrewieStewie. Otherwise I would’ve been willing to. But I’m concerned about having to start that extended autoconfirmation process of a year and 500 edits over again. If I have no other choice but to do that over again, then so be it, I’ll compromise on that. But if I can still have that standing, I would truly appreciate it. Thank you for discussing everything out with me and finding a solution beneficiary for everyone! :) Drewiestewie (talk) 15:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Extended confirmed can be manually set by an admin, and I'd certainly be prepared to enable that. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Sounds great. I gladly and gratefully accept those offers and conditions. Drewiestewie (talk) 16:24, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Alright, here's what I am going to do. Both accounts are going to be renamed to something obscure.  Once that is done, you can recreate the DrewieStewie account, after which I will confirm and extended confirm it.  Then you'll be on your merry way.  Let me know when you're ready to proceed.— CYBERPOWER  ( Chat ) 19:50, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Are you sure that the editor will be able to recreate the DrewieStewie account? I may be wrong, and you may know far more about this than I do, but I am under the impression that fairly recent changes mean that recreating a user name of an account that has been renamed is no longer possible. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I haven't heard of such a thing. If that is true, and he can't recreate the account, I can just move it back.— CYBERPOWER  ( Chat ) 20:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I am ready. I'll still have access to these (soon to be obscurely renamed) accounts for the purpose of future reference or transferring info onto the new clean account, right? just making sure and having all the necessary information. Drewiestewie (talk) 22:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * After James brought it to my attention that accounts can not be created if formerly owned by an account, I'm going to change things up a bit. I will be renaming Pixiemasters.  DrewieStewie, you can go ahead and create a new account now, and I will usurp your current DrewieStewie account and move your new account in its place and assign rights, or I leave the current DrewieStewie in place and unblock it now.  Which would you like?  Sorry for dragging this out.— CYBERPOWER  (<span style="color:\#FF8C00">Around ) 02:05, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Don’t worry, it’s all good. I’m not in a particular rush. I guess I’d prefer to leave the current DrewieStewie in place and have that unblocked, as that’s the less demanding choice for everybody. I’m willing to do the other one if necessary though, but unless I have no other choice but to do that, we shall stick with unblocking DrewieStewie. Appreciate you working everything out with me, slowly but surely and efficiently. Drewiestewie (talk) 02:11, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I've unblocked your DrewieStewie account, and I will be renaming this account now. You may wish to logout from this account now, and log back in there. :-)— CYBERPOWER  (<span style="color:\#FF8C00">Around ) 02:23, 22 August 2018 (UTC)