User talk:Vanshjain official

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vansh Jain (September 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vansh Jain and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Vansh_Jain Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Vansh_Jain reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 15:42, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vansh Jain (September 17)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Vansh_Jain Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:26, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @Theroadislong why sir please approve it Vanshjain official (talk) 17:50, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * It is an autobiography with zero sources and zero indication of any notability whatsoever. Please build yourself a website or use social media, Wikipedia is NOT  a venue for promotion. Theroadislong (talk) 17:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Theroadislong i have a website and i am not promoting anything I have just written my biography and you are zero 0️⃣ if you think that it has zero indication first of all learn some communication skill to talk. Vanshjain official (talk) 18:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Sigh...please read WP:GNG and suggest how you would pass the criteria there. Theroadislong (talk) 18:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Theroadislong can you write my Wikipedia page you can search me on. google Vanshjain official (talk) 18:07, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, I think there may be a misunderstanding here. A lack of notability means that, no matter who writes it, and no matter how nicely written it is, there won't be a Wikipedia article about the topic. An (over)simplified summary of the problem can be found at WP:42. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:09, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @ToBeFree no I don't need now I have submitted your complain to Wikipedia email Vanshjain official (talk) 18:14, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I have already Googled your name "Vansh Jain" and there are zero independent sources about you, sorry. Theroadislong (talk) 18:23, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Theroadislong search for "vansh jain tech" Vanshjain official (talk) 18:43, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Theroadislong i have a local businesses if you googled me out of india than you see nothing about me you don't have common sense Vanshjain official (talk) 18:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I just searched "vansh jain tech", there are still zero independent sources, they are all sources that you have created. You have missunderstood how Wikipedia works, we only report on what reliable independent sources say about a topic. Theroadislong (talk) 18:48, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Theroadislong are you an employee of wikipedia? Vanshjain official (talk) 18:52, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * We are all volunteers spending way too much time with explaining the same things over and over again. Please read WP:42 and have a look at the Task Center or the community portal for ideas unrelated to your conflict of interest. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:54, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Theroadislong i have been mentioned on news app and famepedia and you think that it was zero independent sources sigh... ok👌 Vanshjain official (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Famepedia is user edited and NOT a reliable independent source, sorry. Theroadislong (talk) 18:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Theroadislong but news app not Vanshjain official (talk) 19:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Theroadislong and i have not created any of these. Vanshjain official (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. JBW (talk) 16:54, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Just to eppand upon what JBW wrote.
Hello, Vanshjain official, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

September 2022
Hello, I'm ToBeFree. I noticed that you made a comment in Special:Diff/1110813308 above that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Special:Diff/1110818479. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @ToBeFree i am not attacking editors the guy theroadislong make me rude Vanshjain official (talk) 18:49, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * You have been incivil in response to attempts to explain Wikipedia's concept of notability to you. That's pretty pointless; those you are arguing with couldn't unilaterally change the guidelines even if you persuaded them to, independently of your wording. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:52, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Some advice
Hi, Vansh. Unfortunately your start as a Wikipedia editor hasn't been as pleasant an experience as you probably hoped. I will offer you some advice which I hope may be helpful to you. I hope these words of advice may help you better to understand how Wikipedia works, and if you choose to go on editing here to avoid problems. If you need any clarification of any of the points I have mentioned then please feel very welcome to ask me. JBW (talk) 19:16, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Almost all of us, when we start editing Wikipedia, know little or nothing about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, so many of us start out doing things that are contrary to policies and guidelines that we don't know about. When I started I made mistakes of that kind, and of course I don't blame anyone else for doing so. In your case, you have done what a very large number of people do, which is to think Wikipedia is suitable for writing a personal web page telling the world about themselves. In fact, that is a mistake, because that is not what Wikipedia is for. Nobody can reasonably blame you for making that mistake, but editors have tried to help you by explaining to you why it is a mistake.
 * 2) Wikipedia does not aim to be a collection of information about just anything; to be the topic of a Wikipedia article, a subject needs to satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines, which I'm afraid you don't. You are, of course, very welcome to start making contributions to the encyclopaedia, in line with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, if you are interested in doing so, but if your only interest is in writing a personal web page, then there are many web sites which provide that sort of service, but Wikipedia is not one of them.
 * 3) As I have already said above, almost all of us start out as Wikipedia editors knowing little or nothing about Wikipedia's policies. One of the ways we learn is by taking notice of what more experienced editors tell us. Every one of the messages to you above has been posted by an experienced editor who knows more about how Wikipedia works than you, some of themby Wikipediaadministrators, and you should listen to what they say and learn from it. Unfortunately, instead of accepting the advice given to you by more experienced editors, and perhaps even thanking them for their help, you have responded rather angrily.
 * 4) Nobody "made" you rude. You chose to be rude. If you can't handle other people politely telling you things  that you don't like without getting annoyed and being rude to them, then you won't get far on Wikipedia, because all of us sometimes encounter others with whom we disagree, and we have to accept that, and explain our disagreements in a friendly and civil way. Editors who can't do that don't last long, because they are blocked from editing before long.


 * @JBW it's ok if you think I am wrong I don't care I have edited many time and they rejected time by time👍 Vanshjain official (talk) 19:27, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * OK. I put some time into trying to help you, but you don't want my help. That's your choice. JBW (talk) 19:42, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, that did not turn out as I had hoped. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:26, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Not as I hoped, either, but as I expected. Sometimes I wonder why I put so much time into trying to help people who I'm more than 90% sure won't take any notice at all. Then I remember that I'm a nice person.😇 JBW (talk) 16:21, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes. You are.🙂 -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:15, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  19:55, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @Orangemike i don't care I can make many id as I can how much id you can block 👍. Vanshjain official (talk) 21:34, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * As many as you make, of course. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:44, 17 September 2022 (UTC)



Hello, Vanshjain official. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page Draft:Vansh Jain has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are  unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. '''That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. ''' Please see this page on citing sources. This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:23, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @Deepfriedokra i am only 16 year bro i can make a python program to generate 20 such pages in wikipedia with different accounts. wishes for your success. Vanshjain official (talk) 21:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:44, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I look forward to deleting them, because that's what I do with spam. Best -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:47, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Deepfriedokra And what can expect from a green Vegetable. Vanshjain official (talk) 21:54, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Deepfriedokra ” “Thank you for the prompt response. Vanshjain official (talk) 21:50, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * yeah. bye bye -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:54, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being WP:NOTHERE to build the encyclopedia and threatening block evasion. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)