User talk:Vantelimus

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 09:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

List of United States business school rankings
I notice you have edited List of United States business school rankings. Currently it is a featured list candidate. You may want to express your opinion (Support or Oppose) on its candidacy at Featured list candidates/List of United States business school rankings.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 15:58, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your timely updates: --TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 21:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Weird misuse of TeX in Abstract family of acceptors.

 * Compare $$(\Gamma, I, f, g)$$ to ($$\Gamma$$, $$I$$, $$f$$, $$g$$). Both are legitimate uses of TeX. Which is more readable? In the browsers I checked (Safari and Firefox on Mac, Safari and IE on Windows), it is the latter, i.e. the one you say contains "a weird misuse of Tex". I prefer not to have the commas jammed against the next symbol making it more difficult for my old eyes. The formatting instructions for the former may be simpler, but I always err on the side of legibility when publishing a paper. I assumed legibility was important on the web and Wikipedia also.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vantelimus (talk • contribs) 13:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

They certainly do not look jammed against anything in TeX on the browsers I've looked at them with: both Firefox on Windows and Seamonkey (formerly Mozilla) on Linux. But the latter version looks badly misaligned---some character higher and others lower---and the two bounding parentheses that are not in TeX look jammed against the two adjacent characters. I am the foremost champion of legibility on Wikipedia and possibly the only Wikipedia in whose edit history you will frequently find the word legibility in edit summaries; in many cases that word has been my whole edit summary. When people write the ordered pair (a,b), I often change it to (a, b) both for the sake of legibility and for the sake of making non-TeX mathematical notation match TeX style as closely as possible. Generally I prefer to avoid "inline" TeX on Wikipedia because on the browsers I've used, inline TeX often looks far bigger than the surrounding letters and often gets placed too high or too low rather than properly centered. Michael Hardy (talk) 17:28, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

New star
Thanks for the notification —Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs) 21:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Germany Invitation
--Zeitgespenst (talk) 20:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

law school
No problem, I figured it was a typo. It's a nice infobox. Happy editing. --Bobak (talk) 15:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

UC wikiproject
Oh, it's a pretty loose group, with very few members: WikiProject University of California. Very little effort has gone into structuring the project itself... I've gone ahead and added you to the page as a participant; feel free to make any proposals or raise any concerns there. Great work on the university rankings infobox, btw. Amerique dialectics 23:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Beats having to revert countless kids who view US News as the bible. Amerique dialectics 23:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Roches - hifive.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:The Roches - hifive.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 22:50, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Fixing the Ivy League
Thanks for finding a dead link. However, just because the URL doesn't resolve now doesn't mean it didn't and that the material it supported is suddenly questionable. More polite to just add a tag for a while, give others a chance to see if there's an alternate source available for the given cite. See WP:DEADLINK for more info. DMacks (talk) 15:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Club at Berkeley
Hi Vantelimus, I'm just writing to let you know that me and some Wikipedian friends are launching Wikipedia Club at Berkeley, a student club for promoting participation in Wikipedia and face-to-face collaborations. If you're still living in the Bay Area and that sounds fun to you, please consider joining our mailing list. Thanks! Dcoetzee 01:33, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

JavaScript RegExp problem
I noticed you have experience in JavaScript. I'm hoping you can help me with a problem I've run into writing a userscript.

Please see my post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject JavaScript.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 12:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Kenpo5thBB.png


The file File:Kenpo5thBB.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Suzzy Roche - holysmokes.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Suzzy Roche - holysmokes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Roches - Nurds.gif
Thanks for uploading File:The Roches - Nurds.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)