User talk:Vapeur

Welcome to my talk page.

All comments and suggestions posted here will be answered here.

THANK YOU - SEQUENTIAL CIRCUITS ARTICLE
Thanks a Million for your work on the Sequential Circuits article - it was much needed and something I was hoping to eventually get around to. Great job! synthfiend (talk) 17:49, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! LegoKontribsTalkM 01:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Spirits needs you!
Hello,

You're recieving this message as a contributor to WikiProject Spirits in the past. Currently many members work solo and articles that interest themselves, we'd like to pull the Spirits group together to allow us to raise the overall quality of articles under our banner. If you're still active on Wikipedia and keen on contributing to WikiProject Spirits, head over to the talk page and lend your voice to the discussion. Cabe 6403  (Talk•Sign) 13:57, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bitters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amaro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sequential Circuits Prophet VS concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sequential Circuits Prophet VS, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sequential Circuits Prophet VS


Hello Vapeur. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Sequential Circuits Prophet VS".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sequential Circuits Prophet VS concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sequential Circuits Prophet VS, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sequential Circuits Prophet VS concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sequential Circuits Prophet VS, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sequential Circuits Prophet VS


Hello Vapeur. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Sequential Circuits Prophet VS".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:00, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

New Amsterdam Gin
See, what I hadn't realized is that the article had just been deleted. Which was a terrible deletion decision, because the decision (upon looking at it) was based on the state of the article, not a the actual notability of the product/company. In short, the !voters and closer forgot that AFD is not a substitute for cleanup. That said, I'll see if I can whip up an appropriately neutral stub. oknazevad (talk) 12:44, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Help with Louis XIII (cognac)
Hey Vapeur, I saw you're one of the few active members of WP:Spirits, and I was wondering if you had time to look over some changes I'm proposing for the article on Louis XIII. I drafted up a new version and reached out on the talk page, but it's not very active over there. If you've got a minute, would you be open to collaborating on this and ensuring these are all suitable changes to the article? I'd really appreciate it.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 20:00, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello again! Hope you're doing well. I know you mentioned you were pretty busy, but I wanted to see if there's anything I can do to help out with reviewing/editing the draft. Thanks again for taking the time to look at it in the first place!--FacultiesIntact (talk) 21:47, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello hello! I recently proposed some new content on the Louis talk page. You were such a big help with the last round of edits and I was wondering if you have any time to take a look? Any feedback is always appreciated.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 23:55, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The suggested content has been edited and published.Vapeur (talk) 18:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for your help!--FacultiesIntact (talk) 20:11, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Collaborating on J. Lohr Vineyards & Wines Wikipedia article
Hi Vapeur I noticed you collaborated with my former colleague in the past, FacultiesIntact on the Louis XIII (cognac) Wikipedia article. I recently created a sandbox for proposed edits to the J. Lohr Vineyards & Wines existing article. Would you be open to review this content? Thanks in advance.--Chefmikesf (talk) 20:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Greetings. I've reviewed the language, content, and objectivity of the proposed edits to the J. Lohr Vineyards & Wines article as per your request. I found the article to be well-written, encyclopedic in style, uncluttered with cloying superlatives, and thoroughly referenced. I made only one very minor correction (i.e. sing. heading "Wine" to pl. "Wines"), but found no errors or anything else that caught my attention. The article is thoroughly detailed, but the length and content seem befitting of the age and case volume of the winery. Well done.Vapeur (talk) 22:27, 23 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Vapeur, appreciate the kind words. Due to my COI, would you be open to bring the changes to the J. Lohr Vineyards & Wines article?--Chefmikesf (talk) 20:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Done. The edit is now live.Vapeur (talk) 01:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Vapeur I found a few more updates for the J. Lohr Vineyard & Wines article. Would you be open to review the suggested additions on my sandbox talk page? -- Chefmikesf (talk) 22:05, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Updates reviewed and added. I believe that's everything. If not, let me know. Vapeur (talk) 17:19, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Vapeur Sorry, I think there was misunderstanding, the suggested additions were on the talk page. Could you revert your two last changes and take a look at the sandbox talk page? I can repost the request on the J. Lohr talk page as well.-- Chefmikesf (talk) 19:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Reviewed and added.Vapeur (talk) 23:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)