User talk:Varenfro

My wiki attempts to define what a Virgil is. Because of the ever-changing nature of the Virgil of which today's I is an instance, this will be a continuous endeavor, at many times looping back around to previous definitions of a Virgil, while at other times creating definitions completely at odds with prior definitions. I think a Virgil would not mind such a fluid definition, but it's difficult to be certain about this for long.