User talk:Varsity's horns

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Andre🚐 03:54, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Doug Weller talk 17:56, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   18:00, 2 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, I did explain the reason for the change in the edit summary saying "rvv, wikipedia is supposed to reflect the source not make its own opinions" The source provided does not say "pathway to citezenship" or "undocumented" rather "amnesty" and illegal". It is not the job of Wikipedia editors to make judgements on lanugage or policy, but rather to reflect reliable sources. On a seperate but related point I am aware that Insider is not considered univerally reliable, but until a better source is provided, we'll have to make do. Since there was some confusion on your part I will go ahead and change back the edit. The edit was narrowly tailored to reflect the source making Wikipedia even more encyclopedic. Thanks, Varsity&#39;s horns (talk) 18:10, 2 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm talking about your edit to League of the South. Any issues you may with to raise concerning the article on Chris McDaniel should be brought up inb that article's talkpage, not here.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:32, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Chris McDaniel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Acroterion   (talk)   18:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)