User talk:Vasa Inquitatis

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Vasa Inquitatis! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 19:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

April 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Michael Jorgensen, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 18:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)


 * So when did facts become 'personal analysis' or 'synthesis', and who exactly are you to decide that? My edits are not disruptive as you so claim, they are elements of factual biographical information and cited sources directly from the individual whose Wikipedia page is being represented. How exactly are people supposed to update these pages with factual information if people like you continue to thwart truthful representation of information. If you like we can certainly involve lawyers. Vasa Inquitatis (talk) 19:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia biographies are intended to be summaries of the material that has been published about that person. The "individual" himself may edit the article, but everything that is added must already have appeared in reliable published sources. You cannot just grab the page and rewrite it from memory, shooting from the hip. That's the WP:No original research part; a hard policy at Wikipedia, non-negotiable. The policy surprises a lot of newcomers because "original research" is exactly what is expected of reporters, writers and authors outside of Wikipedia. But inside, we have this policy because the founders decided that every fact should be verifiable in published form. The verifiability policy is also non-negotiable. Binksternet (talk) 19:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * All of the information cited CAN be verified. You are ASSUMING my source is not legitimate rather than even attempting to discern fact from fiction. Vasa Inquitatis (talk) 19:46, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If you cite your sources, your facts will have a solid foundation.
 * One very serious caution: if you imply any sort of legal threat then Wikipedia will block you, and you will not be able to edit. See WP:No legal threats. I hate to see people blocked when they are good-faith editors. Binksternet (talk) 19:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You're not a 'good faith' editor if you are willfully and unduly reverting changes made without DUE CAUSE. I cited my source in the very first comment. Michael Jorgensen IS my source - you know, the ACTUAL individual being represented in the Wikipedia page. Each of the references can be independently verified with a simple google search which you obviously took zero precaution in doing before removing FACTUAL INFORMATION. Vasa Inquitatis (talk) 20:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Secondly, if legal entities are not involved, then how are people supposed to prevent people like you from policing and mismanaging public information under FALSE PRETENSE? Since you implied I'm a 'good faith' editor and you'd hate to see me blocked, then perhaps doing your own due-diligence and verifying my source cited might be an alternative to the unbecoming and argumentative nature of your conduct? Vasa Inquitatis (talk) 20:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I formally and unconditionally withdraw my previous legal threats. Vasa Inquitatis (talk) 20:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Legal threats
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:27, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note for reviewing admins - if the legal threats are withdrawn, then my preference would be the block to be converted to a partial block from editing Michael Jorgensen as this editor does not appear amenable to following our reliable sourcing requirements despite them being explained in detail.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)