User talk:Vasconicus

Defunct taxa
Hi Vasconicus, as you're interested in defunct taxa I was wondering if you would be interested in creating Anthropomorpha and Gravigrada? I would do it but don't have the necessary texts to reference. I don't mind helping out with formatting. Cheers, Jack (talk) 20:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Fossil primates and Category:Fossil Primates
I don't think either of these are needed. The article is just an ordered list, with no information on its importance and no references. The material is already better covered in other articles. Likewise, the category is already covered by the various "Prehistoric X" categories. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:57, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Please reply here (or on one of the other talk pages) and not in email. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:14, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry for emaling you. I didn't do it on purpose.

I think we need an overview on Fossil Primates to keep up-dated general information and correct small contradictions amongst articles. That doesn't mean necessarily that the whole list should be in the same article (that is why I said that Wikipedists were encouraged to organize it in a better way). We could divide the list along the Family level, that is to say: suborders, infraorders, superfamilies and families in the main article (which we could even merge with Primates; my favourite choice) and under the Family level in specific articles (Notharctidae, Adapidae and so on), including subfamilies, tribes, genera, species and even subspecies. Vasconicus (talk) 06:01, 24 September 2008 (UTC)