User talk:Vasili.Papanicolou

Reply
Hi, thanks for email. First the blocks. You were first blocked by for a user name violation. Since you had already made promotional edits from that promotionally-named account, you could have been hard-blocked immediately, but you were lucky enough to be given the option to create a new account. The first block message, however, clearly said You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. You chose to ignore that and continued spamming as an undeclared paid editor. I therefore hard-blocked both accounts.

If you wish to be unblocked, you must follow the procedure at User talk:The Wheel Movie. I won't consider any unblock request myself, since that's not fair to you. Note that it's likely that if you are unblocked it will be conditional on not promoting your film, which probably isn't what you want.

If an editor works directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise is acting on its behalf, they are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, anyone paid directly or indirectly by the organisation they are writing about, is  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose their employer, client and affiliation. Such a mandatory disclosure must be posted to the user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Also read the following regarding writing an article
 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to an affiliated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * You gave two references. One was too a pay-walled site, but from what is viewable, it looks like a press release. The Sydney Herald  consisted of interviews and similar, not independent third-party sources. The rest of your text was unsourced.
 * It's unclear why this unreleased film meets the notability guidelines. Most of your article is just a plot summary and cast list, the only actual fact is  It began filming in 2017. which doesn't make it notable.
 * you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Instead you cherry-picked favourable quotes from people involved in the film, “wonderful script... wonderful twists... hyper-real... environmentally sustainable”. The only acceptable "Reception" section is one using aggregation sites like Rotten Tomatoes. Even independent reviews aren't acceptable, let alone quotes from people directly involved.
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article.

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  14:04, 12 October 2018 (UTC)