User talk:VasilijB

Basic variants
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Basic variants article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing!  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  09:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

 (aeropagitica)   (talk)  09:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC).

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  09:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

You have recently created the article Basic variants. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Deletion review. RandyWang ( raves/rants ) 09:55, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not repost the deleted copyrighted content under any title. It has been removed, as noted above, and will be removed if you keep posting it in future. If you continue reposting speedily-deletible material without even providing any clues why, that may be grounds for blocking. Consider this the last warning. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 10:41, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Please consider providing more informative edit summaries than "The Addition" or like. Informative edit summaries help other users a lot, and edit summaries that basically tell nothing at all what was done do not help... --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 10:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Salvation has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://greekodyssey.typepad.com/my_greek_odyssey/orthodoxy/. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Given name has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Qzd (talk) 06:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Bridges construction


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Bridges construction. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Bridge. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Bridge. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 19:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Bridges construction for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bridges construction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bridges construction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. DMacks (talk) 14:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)