User talk:Vasiliy 100

UR-12
Hi Vasiliy, your addition of db-author to UR-12 is not suitable, as another editor has added content to the article, meaning you are not the "author of the only substantial content". I have asked the other editor if they mind it being deleted, but in the mean time it needs to stay. If you wish you can propose it is deleted in another way through WP:PROD or WP:AFD. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 14:11, 30 October 2011 (UTC)


 * You need to read the instructions. Please don't remove the content either - it should stay for the time being. SmartSE (talk) 14:16, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * How I can delete it?Vasiliy 100 (talk) 14:19, 30 October 2011 (UTC)Vasiliy

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at UR-12, you may be blocked from editing. Denisarona (talk) 14:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)


 * You need to follow the instructions in the link I gave above. Add adding a reason for it to be deleted, based on a policy such as WP:N. Then you need to note in the edit summary that you are proposing it for deletion. Or you can wait until Meodipt replies (a day or two at most) and if they agree then I will delete it immediately. That will be quickest as a proposed deletion has to wait a week until it can be deleted. SmartSE (talk) 14:28, 30 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Meodipt didn't agree and has stopped the proposed deletion. If you still think that it should be deleted you will need to follow the instruction at AFD. SmartSE (talk) 10:22, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of UR-144


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as UR-144, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. That's me!  Have doubt?   What I done?  06:38, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of UR-144


A tag has been placed on UR-144, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. That's me!  Have doubt?   What I done?  06:39, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at UR-144
Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from UR-144. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willingly to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 06:45, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says [ Click here to contest this speedy deletion].
 * 2) This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Proposed deletion of UR-144


The article UR-144 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a sufficiently notable chemical to be included.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 08:53, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Articles for creation/UR-144


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Wikipedia:Articles for creation/UR-144. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - UR-144. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at UR-144 - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Enix150 (talk) 07:09, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Warning
As Meodipt has explained here the articles that you have so far created have been inaccurate, containing erroneous pharmacological data. Combined with the unusual naming conventions it seems likely that you may be creating Wikipedia articles to inaccurately described designer drugs. This is a serious issue and if you were to continue, it is likely your account will be blocked. If our deduction is incorrect then I apologise, but please be certain to fully reference your articles with reliable sources and name them using conventional names in the future. SmartSE (talk) 21:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)