User talk:Vassilis81

Hellenic Air Force
Please don’t add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source, as you have done on the Hellenic Air Force article. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources –Thank you FOX 52 (talk) 01:51, 20 July 2020 (UTC)


 * C130.net is not a reliable source - you cannot use it to justify changes to Wikipedia articles.Nigel Ish (talk) 10:56, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of aircraft of the Hellenic Air Force, you may be blocked from editing. you changed content based on a source in the edit summary, while leaving the existing cite - not only is this unacceptable as you are saying that the original source says something it doesn't, but the source you mentioned in the edit summary doesn't back up your changes either. DO NOT MISREPRESENT SOURCES LIKE THAT!Nigel Ish (talk) 11:10, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Turkish Air Force and Information
Hello, you did not add sources to the edit on the List of active aircraft of the Turkish Air Force. Please add sources with your edits. List of active aircraft of the Turkish Air Force do not add sources to the summary section as you did on article. Also, this source is old and wrong. If you don't know how to add sources, read this: Tutorial (historical)/Citing sourcesAta Barış (talk) 18:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

List of equipment of the Turkish Land Forces
 PLEASE STOP  changing or removing reliably sourced, content as you have done on  the List of equipment of the Turkish Land Forces article. If you continue to disruptively edit, you may be permanently blocked from Wikipedia - SO STOP PLAYING WITH NUMBERS!! WP:SNEAKY Cengizsogutlu (talk) 13:24, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of equipment of the Hellenic Army. FDW777 (talk) 20:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Persistent addition of unsourced content; ignoring community concerns about the behavior in violation of WP:BURDEN. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Vassilis81. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   20:47, 9 May 2021 (UTC)