User talk:Vasssi

April 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Brunello di Montalcino, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
 * Copying text from other sources
 * Policy on copyright
 * Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
 * Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
 * Overview
 * Help pages

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:37, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Tommaso A. Dragani moved to draftspace
Hello Vasssi, your article on Dragani is extremely promotional. It also included some copyrighted material which I've removed. The article reads like a promo-piece on Dragani, and not something that summarizes neutrally what reliable secondary sources say about him. "Most prestigious", "top researcher", "pioneered", all of these qualifiers should be removed. I could also not verify these claims of "first".

The best sources to use are reliable, independent sources.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can work on the article. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

You should also see our guidelines for editors with a conflict of interest.

– Thjarkur (talk) 21:46, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Tommaso A. Dragani for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tommaso A. Dragani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tommaso A. Dragani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Amkgp (talk) 18:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello Vasssi. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Vasssi. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 15:32, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello Praxidicae. I make edits based on my personal interests and regarding topics, which I know better: science, wine and law mostly. I've read carefully Wikipedia policies and I'm fully respecting all Wikipedia rules. Indeed, I am trying to be a good editor, that grounds his contributions only on verifiable sources, with the aim to improve the Wikipedia community and to make a good service for everyone. Vasssi (talk) 15:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Please explain how you took this photo. Praxidicae (talk) 16:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

I took the photo you are talking about from this website https://dirittopenaleuomo.org/autori-dpu/tommaso-dragani/, after asking permission to use it. This photo is copyright free as Wikipedia policy states. Vasssi (talk) 16:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah except that you uploaded it very clearly as your own work, which is a lie. Praxidicae (talk) 16:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
You are not permitted to edit or removed declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. You are free to make a new request, but must specifically address the concerns raised at Sockpuppet investigations/Vasssi. --Yamla (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

To the reviewing admin, note every single one of the edits this person uses as defense of their good editing was reverted as inappropriate. Also, the bizarre position that Wikipedia is a democracy (see WP:NOTDEMOCRACY) shows perhaps they lack sufficient competence to edit here, and you should consider reverting talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 19:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Also note over on User talk:Adalberto75, the sockpuppet account confirms they were recruited by Vasssi. So, "One of my friends, probably, decided to back my arguments" is an attempt to mislead us. Enough, I'm revoking talk page access right now. --Yamla (talk) 19:33, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 30107
-- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 17:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Tommaso A. Dragani for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tommaso A. Dragani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tommaso A. Dragani& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajpolino (talk) 23:37, 18 June 2020 (UTC)