User talk:Vasyaivanov

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Vasyaivanov! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Marek. 69  talk  03:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Edit summaries
Hello. Can I please encourage you to use edit summaries when making changes to articles? On Talmud you removed information but without giving an explanation it is not clear what your problem is with this content. There is no real dispute about the name "Palestinian Talmud" for the Talmud Yerushalmi/Jerusalem Talmud, as this is the name used particularly in academic sources.

There is always the option of starting a discussion on Talk:Talmud if you have real concerns about a particular addition. Kind regards. JFW &#124; T@lk  05:35, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

ARBPIA3
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The Arbitration Committee has placed restrictions on who may edit in the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area. Editors are required to have 500 edits and be registered for 30 days, which you do not currently meet. As such you may not edit in the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area until you do. You can read more about this here. Please edit in other topic areas until you have completed the requirements.  nableezy  - 17:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Huldra. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hebron have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Jewish prayers and blessings into Hanukkah. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:33, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Nebuchadnezzar II seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 05:58, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 06:11, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Tgeorgescu (talk) 08:19, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Leonid Dukhovny moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Leonid Dukhovny, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:54, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leonid Dukhovny (September 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Noahfgodard were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leonid Dukhovny and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Leonid Dukhovny, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Leonid_Dukhovny Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Noahfgodard&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Leonid_Dukhovny reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noahfgodard (talk) 18:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Leonid Dukhovny
Hello, Vasyaivanov. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leonid Dukhovny, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Leonid Dukhovny


Hello, Vasyaivanov. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Leonid Dukhovny".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Your request for arbitration has been declined
In response to your request for arbitration, the Arbitration Committee has agreed that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

Disputes among editors regarding the content of an article should use structured discussion on the talk page between the disputing editors. However, requests for comment, third opinions and other venues are available if discussion alone does not yield a consensus. The dispute resolution noticeboard also exists as a method of resolving content disputes that aren't easily resolved with talk page discussion.

In all cases, you should review Dispute resolution to learn more about resolving disputes on Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia community has many venues for resolving disputes and grievances, and it is important to explore them instead of requesting arbitration in the first instance. For more information on the process of arbitration, please see the Arbitration Policy and the Guide to Arbitration. I hope this advice is useful, and please do not hesitate to contact me or a member of the community if you have more questions. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 23:41, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Conflict of interest?
I see you have uploaded a series of images of an Alef Aeronautics product to Wikimedia Commons, stating that the images are your own work. Given that several of the images can also be found elsewhere online, and would appear to have been used within Alef's own publicity material, it seems reasonable to ask whether you have any connection with Alef, and whether you are aware of Wikipedia's policies towards conflict of interest editing, and with the requirement for editors engaging in editing for payment to make a declaration. AndyTheGrump (talk) 04:55, 14 November 2022 (UTC)