User talk:Vatsontheroll

November 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sharjeel Imam has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sharjeel Imam was changed by Vatsontheroll (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889505 on 2020-11-25T12:57:16+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sharjeel Imam. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Lol terrorist and radicals are here on Wikipedia as well. No wonder why likes of sharjeel imam are branded as activist. Vatsontheroll (talk) 13:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. CLCStudent (talk) 13:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Lol I didn't know that Wikipedia has jihadi bots as well. Good to know that radicals. Vatsontheroll (talk) 13:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I highly recommend reading up on and understanding fundamental policies like WP:RS and WP:NPOV before throwing around insults like this.  Angry Harpy   talk 13:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Wow its sad to see that you haven't had read anything in your life then. Go and get some sort of education first rather than being a part of propaganda Vatsontheroll (talk) 05:23, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. KevinL ( aka L235 · t · c) 06:30, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

🤣🤣🤣 like a give a damn that you blocked me Vatsontheroll (talk) 12:44, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. KevinL ( aka L235 · t · c) 03:04, 27 November 2020 (UTC)