User talk:Vawanichrish

Welcome
Hello Vawanichrish and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:27, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Per the cited sources, the King himself has said "Thus I have sentimental attachment with Nepal because I was born there in the year 1980". RA 0808  talkcontribs 18:41, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Birth Place was wrong
I am from Bhutan. The king wasn’t born in Nepal. How could a King of one country is born in another country? So I changed Vawanichrish (talk) 18:53, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

''As per WP:BRD don't make anymore edits on the article. Go to the talkpage to gain consensus.'' Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:51, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:52, 24 November 2017 (UTC)