User talk:Vblhh

November 2016
Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Santhu Straight Forward, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Diffs: The formatting you submitted is also problematic. There is no "boxoffice" parameter of the Infobox.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Santhu Straight Forward. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Diffs: Unsourced changes, bogus URL, formatting errors, etc. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Santhu Straight Forward shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cotton2 (talk) 08:00, 20 November 2016 (UTC)