User talk:Vcarveratcma/final

peer review
1. Completeness: 500 words per person: No, 0 words Lead Paragraph: none 4 Sections of content: only one section, but no content Minimum ammount of citations: none Images: none

2. Evaluation of Resources: Are the sources listed in the References of sufficient authority? no References Are the sources listed in the References of accurate? no References Conduct searches of the topic yourself. Do you feel like the authors found worth while articles or just easily available articles? No

3. Readability & Content: Is the information being presented factual in nature? No information Is the information being presented objective? (No Bias)No information Does the article flow effectively? No information Does the article feeling like it is missing content? There is no Content

Huenemet (talk) 15:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC) You really need to add a few things. I would really enjoy evaluating your page :p — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdowell92 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

I think you might want to add a little more information on your page to make it complete. Hscheidemantle (talk) 15:39, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Hscheidemantle