User talk:Vcarveratcma/sandbox

Peer Review
This page looks good it meets the required length and has enough sources. It also needs a picture. Thomasbeeson (talk) 15:33, 16 April 2012 (UTC) 1.	Completeness: o	500 words per person: 500 words minimum completed o	Lead Paragraph: Yes, each paragraph has been lead o	4 Sections of content: minimum of 4 sections completed o	Minimum amount of citations: Yes o	Images: Two images in the page, well located 2.	Evaluation of Resources: o	Are the sources listed in the References of sufficient authority? Yes o	Are the sources listed in the References of accurate? Yes o	Conduct searches of the topic yourself. Do you feel like the authors found worth while articles or just easily available articles? Yes 3.	Readability & Content: o	Is the information being presented factual in nature? Yes o	Is the information being presented objective? (No Bias) Yes o	Does the article flow effectively? Yes, it is well organized, easy to follow o	Does the article feeling like it is missing content? No, the author has presented enough information that support the sections in the wiki. Eivelazquez (talk) 03:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC)