User talk:Vcfineart

Possibly unfree File:HugoCrosthwaite.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HugoCrosthwaite.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:17, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get | live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushbugled13 (talk) 01:15, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Hugo Crosthwaite, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 16:51, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.


 * Hello, the Hugo article looks great, nice work. One suggestion: this isn't absolutely mandatory, but if you want to add a little more polish to the article, and make it easier for readers to grasp the strength of your sourcing, fleshing out your current footnotes into full citations would be great. For example, you have some footnotes where the newspaper and date is mentioned, but not the article titel, or where the name of a page is mentioned, but not which gallery owns it, or it's unclear whether it's an "artist bio" or a "listing of works on display" or whatnot. The guideline Citing sources is way long so please don't feel obligated to read it or anything, but if you glance at it to see some examples of full footnotes, and take maybe 30 minutes to flesh out your current footnotes, it'll be a nice further polishing of the article. Hope this helps! MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:26, 30 November 2012 (UTC)