User talk:Vcymbals16/sandbox

This is where the peer review feedback for Vcymbals16 sandbox draft content should be posted. Be sure to sign your post and complete the Canvas quiz to receive credit for your work. UWM.AP.Endo (talk) 04:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

xv review
Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone?

Yes, the sandbox made statements on what the suspected or possible causes of hysterical strength could be accredited to in an unbiased and objective way. It did not show any bias.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines?

Yes, it does for the most part in regards to not giving out medical advice, however, the majority of the sources were from primary sources or other non-credible sources. I think that number 4 and 5 could be left out as they are not credible sources.

Are the citations formatted correctly?

Yes, however since some were not the typical sources that we see such as posters/pamphlets. The other sources were cited in APA.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article?

Yes, it does. The page is not well developed and has little contribution so adding this sandbox would help explain what hysterical strength is.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to?

You could contribute to a section dedicated to addressing opponents of this idea as well as a historical tab that includes the earliest discoveries of this phenomenon.

Xengvang (talk) 06:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Dinah's Review
Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Most of the contents are presented in an unbiased manner however, the use of "may be" make it sound a little opinionative.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? The information in this article is pure biological study. There is no need to follow the MERDS guidelines

Are the citations formatted correctly? The citations are formatted correctly. They are all in an APA format.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? It makes sense to add new content. It gives readers more information about the topic.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? The article is very underdeveloped and required a lot of input. The author can make a contribution to the research section or create a new section taking about the different hormones that contribute to the hysterical strength. The author can also include the reason behind the name "hysterical"Dinahcann (talk) 15:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)