User talk:Vdfoxcc

Dear @Soetermans ,

I am writing to offer a sincere and meaningful apology for my actions in using sock puppets in bad faith. I understand that my behavior has caused you harm and discomfort, and I deeply regret any negative impact that it may have had on our community.

I take full responsibility for my actions and want to assure you that I never intended to deceive or harm you. I understand that my use of sock puppets in this manner was inappropriate and disrespectful to the community, and I am truly sorry for any hurt that I may have caused.

I am asking for your forgiveness for my actions and hope that you can find it in your heart to unblock me and give me the opportunity to make amends. I value our community and would be grateful for the chance to rebuild the trust that I have broken.

Moving forward, I want to make a sincere effort to be more transparent and honest in all of my interactions, both online and in person. I understand that it may take time for you to trust me again, but I am willing to do whatever it takes to regain your trust.

Once again, I am deeply sorry for my actions and the pain that they have caused. Thank you for taking the time to read my apology, and I hope that we can work towards a positive resolution.

Sincerely, Vdfoxcc (talk)

March 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Islam/GA2. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Hogwarts Legacy, you may be blocked from editing. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 00:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * I am the reviewer I can pass it. Can I not? @Soetermans Vdfoxcc (talk) 00:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I just woke up when I undid your edit. I said a month, but your account hasn't been active for more than a day. Newly registered editors don't tend to start with GA assessments, you know. And look, you've been blocked because you were trolling and abusing multiple accounts. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I find it unbecoming of you to through a claim of sock-puppetry on me without checkuser. Accusations of sock-puppetry can be serious and damaging, and it is important to approach them with caution and due diligence. Without concrete evidence to support such claims, they should not be made lightly Vdfoxcc (talk) 16:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It's rather curious that a brand-new account just out of nowhere starts reviewing GAs. You were editing disruptively regardless. Also, how do you know what sock-puppetry is and checkusers are? You use a lot of fancy words without actually addressing the issue: you were trolling. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 17:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The use of sock-puppetry and other such words are used to highlight how thoroughly I have reviewed the rules of wikipedia. I strongly advise you to attempt to change your mind  of stone in to one which can accept and see my point of view.  Vdfoxcc (talk) 18:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Hogwarts Legacy/GA1


A tag has been placed on Talk:Hogwarts Legacy/GA1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"See WT:GAN"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)