User talk:Vdh m

November 2018
Your recent edits to User talk:Lukespen could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   17:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for removing the threats as instructed. I appreciate it very much! :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   17:36, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Some good news for you
After I read Lukespen's message on your user talk page and noticed that he implied that he'd use other accounts to keep adding the same information to those articles, I took a look at the edit history of each one and saw that two user accounts were making the exact same edits to them. Upon investigating further, I saw that one account stopped editing and the other account was created and began making edits to those articles immediately afterwards... these are big red flags for sock puppetry (or using more than one account illegitimately to cause disruption). After further investigation, I opened a formal report, and shortly after it was opened, both accounts were confirmed as being from the same person and both accounts are now indefinitely blocked. I just figured I'd let you know and share the news. Best regards -  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Vdh m, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Denim11 (talk) 14:19, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Suki Waterhouse
It appears the only reason you are here on Wikipedia is to edit the Suki Waterhouse article, specifically removing any content regarding her relationship status. For the last two years, these are the only (non-user talk page) edits you have made. A simple google search will confirm that she is in a relationship, including photos of the two of them kissing and holding hands in public. Considering the overabundance of reliable sources and evidence, I think it is safe to say that they are in a relationship. Gossip is only gossip if there is no evidence to support the claim, but considering the overwhelming evidence to support it (as well as the fact that neither have denied the relationship), I am asking that you stop removing the content. It may have only been a rumor 2 years ago, but the evidence is there to support the statement now. - Adolphus79 (talk) 21:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Robert Pattinson and Suki Waterhouse) for persistently removing removing reliably sourced information you seem to dislike. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

I received 10 mails with comments about this issue. I already said that I don’t delete it because of the relationship but I deleted it because of the fact that they say they live together in london. They quarantined together in a rental apartment. They don’t officially live together that was the only thing that was not correct. So you can send me a 100 times, I didn’t change anything anymore after the first e - mail. Vdh m (talk) 13:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * That's not even true, you blank the entire section each time. - Adolphus79 (talk) 17:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

You call me a liar? After the first time I received in my mailbox that it was not allowed I didn’t do anything anymore. Since than I receive mails from multiple people and you keep coming at me without any reason. Vdh m (talk) 17:32, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Last time I edited was yesterday. This morning I had e mails that it was not allowed and that if I keep doing it I would be blocked. I didn’t do anything anymore and yet I received a mail later that I was blocked. Why send warnings by several people and block people after all? So don’t accuse me of the fact that I kept doing it, because I didn’t. I start to think that the editor behind this isn’t very objective at all. Vdh m (talk) 18:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * In any case, you won't be editing either article anymore, so no need to worry about it further. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Haha got nothing to say anymore? I’ll make a few reports myself. I don’t think it’s normal that some editors use their “ power “ and bash on people like you’re doing. Bye Vdh m (talk) 04:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 18:42, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

I only have one adress. And only one account. And I am done being bullied and harassed by some editors. Vdh m (talk) 20:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

So yeah please. Let me know the outcome of this. Vdh m (talk) 20:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Followed by an apology. I’ve made edits because not the whole thing they wrote was true. I received mails that I wasn’t allowed to do it anymore and I listened. The same day I received multiple warnings while I was doing nothing and blocked without reason. Now I am being accused of this nonsense. I don’t think it’s allowed to bully people? Accuse them when they do nothing wrong? I expect a mail with the fantastic outcome that I am not doing this and an apology from the editors who seem to keep an eye on me and follow me and accuse me without any reason. Vdh m (talk) 20:10, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


 * You can follow the link to the report, and see it was closed as "not related". As far as the accusations of bullying and harassment, you would need to provide some evidence.  The warnings (and block) were given because of your continued removal of sourced material from two specific articles without any edits anywhere else on the wiki (which falls under WP:3RR, WP:EDITWARRING, WP:TALKDONTREVERT, etc.).  You are more than welcome to continue editing other articles, just not Suki or Robert's articles.  Feel free to ask if you have any other questions or concerns. - Adolphus79 (talk) 21:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)