User talk:Vealj

Cec Cinder
Hi Veal. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

Re: Cec Cinder. Note that physician article names typically do not carry Ph.D. in the title of the article. Refer to List of physicians. Thanks! Dandelion1 23:13, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

NPOV on Judi Williams and Cheridonna Alexander
Greetings, Vealj, and thank you for your Wikipedia contributions! I recently tagged the Judi Williams and Cheridonna Alexander articles with the template because of concerns about their conforming to the Neutral point of view policy. I'd be happy to discuss this with you and help you work these articles into a more objective form. You can reply to me here or leave a comment on my talk page to talk about this. Thanks! WarpFlyght 22:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Morley Schloss
I've added the "prod" template to the article Morley Schloss, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Morley Schloss. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. TheRingess 17:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Vealj! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Kurt Barthel -

Nomination of Turner Stokes for deletion
The article Turner Stokes is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Turner Stokes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Snowman (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mark Storey


The article Mark Storey has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Very little referencing on offer and likely failure of WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —  RAVEN PVFF   · talk  · 17:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)