User talk:VectorVoyager/Comrade-yutyo

June 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Democracy and Progress Party, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:18, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi . I have provided references now which is their party program, and deleted the former info and its references as they weren't from the first hand but from liberal news sites that praise that type of politicians.

MOS:LINUX
In this edit you violated MOS:LINUX.

That's fine -- not everyone is aware of our guideline on the use of Linux and GNU/Linux -- but when I reverted you with a link to MOS:LINUX, instead of agreeing to follow that guideline, you posted a rather aggressive message on my talk page, threatening to WP:EDITWAR.

Please be WP:CIVIL, and when someone cites a Wikipedia guideline or policy, please read the guideline or policy and explain why you believe that it doesn't apply to you.

Related: Talk:Raspberry Pi. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi . I have replied to you over there. I wanna say the same stuff tho. GNU utilities' code being not much doesn't change the fact that they are/were critical. GNU project helped to the Linux kernel to become a widely used libre kernel at its very early development. Without the GNU utils, Linux just would be something like other crap Unix clones. The quantity doesn't matter but the quality does. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 11:05, 4 June 2020 (UTC)


 * I think it is fine to discuss what to call Linux on Talk:Raspberry Pi -- the page where you tried to change it -- so I am going to avoid that topic here. I would, however, like to discuss something with you here on your talk page as opposed to a widely read page such as Talk:Raspberry Pi. I would like to discuss your behavior. Please read what I wrote above and respond. Do you think your behavior was appropriate? Why did you act as if I didn't give a reason for reverting you? Was the link to MOS:LINUX not clear? --Guy Macon (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * (...Sound of Crickets...) --Guy Macon (talk) 20:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Prostitution in Poland‎; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --John B123 (talk) 13:59, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * I have already stated my edit in the talk page, that how the current article is biased and my edit is neutral, yet you didn't engage in discussion and now threatening me to block. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 14:30, 16 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:BRD. When another editor disagrees with an edit and reverts it, it should be discussed on the talk page and the text of the article reverted to as it was before the contested change. It does not mean keep changing it to what you think it should be and then discuss it. --John B123 (talk) 14:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Barış Atay moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Barış Atay, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Profintern, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Unlicensed logos
Do not upload logos without a valid license as that is a copyright infringement! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 02:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey, I have seen you have reverted many of my edits. Stuff I have added are made by me. They are vector illustrations of current official logos of those parties, which were actually in public domain with very low res. Them being copyright infringement doesn't make sense as their original low res versions are currently used in respectative pages under public domain. I have given labor to vectorize them and shared my work under CC-BY-SA04. There is no infringement. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 14:24, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If they are indeed the actual logos used by the parties then you have to prove that their use is not a copyright infringement. You having made the files does not make it ok to use without the valid license! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:28, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Since when vectorizing public images is unlicensed sharing and copyright infringement? I have done the logos myself and they are indeed the vectorized versions of their current logos, which are public domain! --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 14:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If you make a picture and it is similar to another work, that may count as an infringement. Also, your word has no value as to the claim of the original logos being in public domain as you cannot use yourself as a source. You have to provide acctual proof that the logos you have copied are acctually in the public domain! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:36, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I take images from Wikipedia, literally. I vectorize the images that are ALREADY shared here under CC-BY-SA 04 or any other CC license, which let me to do vectorization. There is no infringement to anything that is already on Wikipedia and reshared by my permission. Is that your reply to contribution, "comrade"? --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 14:40, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * here, I have also done one vectorization work for you. Taken the NA logo you have shared under public domain and vectorized it, resharing it under the same conditions. Is that copyright infringement? Norsk Aksjon Logo.svg
 * If a logo is already on wikimedia, copying the design is redundant. Also, the logo of the NA is literally my own design, all rights to that image belongs to me! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:48, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * You have shared it under CC BY SA 4.0, which means anyone can modify it as long as they redistribute it with the same manners. Its a low-res design, as many other designs of respectable parties I have vectorized. What I do is a work that helps the wiki to have quality content and deserves an appreciation, but you revert my work for nothing and call me I do copyright infringements while its my work of restoration. I don't do any infringement. I don't copy design, I vectorize low-res designs shared under CC BY SA 4.0 JUST LIKE EVERYTHING SHARED HERE and redistribute them UNDER THE SAME MANNER. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 14:54, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page User:Vif12vf, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Confederation of Progressive Trade Unions of Turkey
 * added a link pointing to WFTU
 * Workers International Relief
 * added a link pointing to Charity

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited EndeavourOS, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Budgie and AUR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Prostitution in Poland; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --John B123 (talk) 22:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Disambiguation link notification for September 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Students' Union (Turkey), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bus terminal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CivicActions


A tag has been placed on CivicActions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Celestina007 10:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Celestina007. I think there are several problems of neutrality as well, but I have tried my best to provide information from the objective actions of the company. If it contains any subjective notion that I have (very likely) missed and damages the neutrality, then I would love and willing to fix them. Can you please help me about that? --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 10:23, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kliment Voroshilov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minority.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Congressional Progressive Caucus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Center.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Serhat Koç
Hello Comrade-yutyo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Serhat Koç for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 22:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


 * John B123 Where is the page??? Its just turned to the other Serhat Koç. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 05:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi Comrade-yutyo, the page was deleted and the original page moved back. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 08:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


 * John B123 The history for the page is vanished as well. Is it possible to do a recovery? I can provide proof for being able to use those lines, but they can be reduced if necessary. About satisfying Wikipedia criteria, Serhat Koç (attorney) has more viability than Serhat Koç (footballer), who has contributed to numerous academic papers. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 08:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You would need to talk to the deleting admin,, about recovering the article. A quick Google search doesn't suggest the academic is better known than the footballer. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 14:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The page was deleted due to copyright concerns, so it cannot be recovered. You would have to start it over again in your own words. ... disco spinster   talk  15:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pirate Party of Turkey politicians


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Pirate Party of Turkey politicians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 5a5ha seven (talk) 19:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liceo Italiano di Istanbul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public school.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Serhat Koç (attorney) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Serhat Koç (attorney), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 11:49, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Serhat Koç (attorney)
Hello, Comrade-yutyo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Serhat Koç (attorney), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Serhat Koç (attorney)


Hello, Comrade-yutyo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Serhat Koç".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 11:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

You are invited to join us in our FOSS portal!
I found you since you are currently an official participant of WT:FOSS. It is great to see how much you contribute to Wikipedia and especially FOSS topics every day. Keep up the good work! We would love to have you be an active part of WT:FOSS. If you feel more comfortable to edit articles on your own then that is totally fine too. But we wanted to reach out to offer you to work together with other FOSS enthusiasts to work together on articles which need attention. Feel free to join our talk page to see what recently happened (a lot!) GavriilaDmitriev (talk) 11:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for compliments! I love contributing. Of course I would like to engage in articles on the portal. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 19:58, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey @Comrade-yutyo!
 * I would love to see you in IRC. Do you have the possibility to look over at times?
 * Details are on WP:FOSS and WP:SOFTWARE Talk pages. Hopefully see you!
 * GavriilaDmitriev (talk • they/them) 13:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of TIC-80 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TIC-80, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/TIC-80 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Matt Hicks (engineer)
Page has been moved to draft as it lacks independent sourcing. Please see WP:NPERSON, WP:GNG and WP:RS. Do not move the article back to mainspace without improvement as it will wind up being sent for deletion. Slywriter (talk) 20:44, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Hat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page President.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Hicks (engineer) (July 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Styyx was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matt Hicks (engineer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Matt Hicks (engineer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Matt_Hicks_(engineer) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Styyx&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Matt_Hicks_(engineer) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Styyx Talk ? 00:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Template:Red Hat. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Aoidh (talk) 18:25, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Comment - That navigation template is not a place to simply list people associated with the company. It is a navigational tool used to navigate to other relevant articles. There is no article on the person you are adding, therefore the link on the navigational page is pointless. That he is the OpenShift guy is not a reason to link a nonexisting article on a navigational template; there is nothing to navigate to. - Aoidh (talk) 18:28, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The link is noexisting because some people decided its not notable for now while it has the objective potential of having the page in a near future as he is indeed among important people of the company that he is literally the CEO of it.--Comrade-yutyo (talk) 18:35, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, and until there is an article, there doesn't need to be a link there. - Aoidh (talk) 18:38, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * there can be the link to encourage people to improve the draft to make it notable for current wiki criterie if possible as he indeed is for the company.--Comrade-yutyo (talk) 18:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * You will need consensus to do that, especially since WP:EXISTING says not do. —C.Fred (talk) 18:45, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * at least make it a blank text so maybe one day it may be linked. Just search the net on the guy and a new article is made about him since he became CEO. Its a matter of days until he completely meets the criteria and has a page.--Comrade-yutyo (talk) 19:01, 19 July 2022 (UTC)


 * You can't just keep saying he's notable and then try to effect change on that basis. Notability is demonstrated, not claimed. As it stands, he's not notable. Being the CEO does not make him notable, nor does it even create a presumption of notability. The issue isn't that there aren't enough eyes on the draft, the issue is the subject of the draft just doesn't have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject (WP:GNG). There could be 3,000 people looking at that draft and that wouldn't change anything if the sources aren't supporting notability. - Aoidh (talk) 18:51, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * stating that he is not notable is your and your friends' relative bias based on the biased perception of Wikipedia's notability principles. that are open to discussion, yet several references like Red Hat - ABB deal and another reference underlying his role on that met the criteria yet you guys decided it didn't. I want to ask other people about it!--Comrade-yutyo (talk) 18:58, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Does it not occur to you that if everyone else is saying one thing, and you alone are saying another thing, that maybe you're the one that's mistaken? It is not bias that leads people to say he's not notable, it is an understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines on notability. You are welcome to ask anyone you want about it, but if you're going to accuse someone of bias, it would be advisable to provide evidence of that claim, per WP:ASPERSIONS. "Everyone but me is biased" is not a convincing argument, but by all means ask someone else, don't take my word for it. - Aoidh (talk) 19:10, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 21:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Piedmontese Museum of Informatics moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Piedmontese Museum of Informatics, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 20:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)