User talk:Vedantahindu

Kalki
Please refrain from charging editors with racism just because there is material on Kalki that does not agree with your own ideologies. Wikipedia is not censored (please see WP:WWIN). That section of the article is for non-Hindu views of Kalki. I'm afraid Hinduism does not have the market cornered on various avatars and deities.

Removing cited material from a page can be viewed as vandalism. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 23:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I will be replacing the material shortly. I will not do it now because I don't want to break the three revert rule (see WP:3RR). You have to understand that by removing the material you are slanting the page to your own point of view, which is against wikipedia policy. Please see NPOV. I encourage you to discuss the matter before deleting the page again. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 00:40, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

"wise sir who is so much big and very great and of much mind."

Hilarious. I can't answer all of your sarcastic questions until I get back from work. Thanks for the boost to my ego, though. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 00:18, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Ridiculous There is no place for pushing agendas on Wikipedia. I'll take a look at this article later tonight and see what makes the most sense to me. From my cursory glance, I can see that there is already an incivil back-and-forth going on here, and my guess is that the content of the article is suffering as a consequence. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:50, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Use of wikipedia fringe board
This case clearly calls for use of Wikipedia Fringe Theories Noticeboard here -> Fringe theories/Noticeboard‎ - better if you follow a proper format and explain all the instances and show all diffs of such behavior. Dab is an editor and admin who usually takes care of the cases like that. He is often posting on this board and he is a good point of contact. The notion is certainly a Fringe Theory and there is nothing much to say about it. Wikidās ॐ 14:24, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * It is customary to alert an editor that they are being included in a discussion such as the one on the fringe theory noticeboard. I did not get such an alert. Maligning an editor in a discussion that they are not aware of is not very good practice. As you are new, it is ok, but you need to alert people in the future. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 18:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Please note your recruiting of several editors smells of WP:Meat puppet. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 22:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It does not - one should communicate and contact relevant editors. That is a correct process, maybe the person in question should have given a more objective picture, but there is not need for NPOV on the talk pages. Wikidās ॐ 18:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)