User talk:Vedbas

Flush edits (sort of)
Hi — I've noticed that you're making largely redundant edits, already up in the several hundreds (!!), changing the references tag to the reflist template. Both are valid methods, AFAIK, so why make these changes? Your edit notes offer no clue, either, just saying 'fix'. Obviously you don't need to explain yourself to me, but if you wish to, I'd sure be interested to know. Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:54, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi ,thanks for massage.I just (references) It removes (Reflist) Reflist template use I know the two are same However, I am using it to say that the template is standard,  Chief Minister      (Talk)   06:11, 27 June 2021 (UTC)


 * My point was that they are both 'standard'. But I guess that's one way quickly to drive up your edit count, if that were your aim for some reason... --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:30, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey man ,I have no interest To increase editing, I just want to improve Wikipedia.  Chief Minister      (Talk)   06:33, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * To improve Wikipedia, you could be fixing typos, or improving grammar, or expanding articles. The edits you've been making do not improve Wikipedia. Granted, they don't make it worse either, but there is no need for those edits. Please stop. Steelkamp (talk) 08:31, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi DoubleGrazing Having said that I have cleared the new article.If you don't mind I will try to give you some work suggestions. One more Can I clean up new articles?   Chief Minister      (Talk)   08:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You need to stop making these pointless edits that just add spaces. Fix typos, fix grammar, expand articles. Steelkamp (talk) 11:12, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Vedbas seem to have made over 11+ edits in a minute a hour ago! i dont think a normal human can do that is this some sort of automated editing? RatnaHastin talk  11:45, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes. In fact they kept up a continuous rate of 11 or more edits in each minute over a long time period. There is no question that they have been using some kind of automated editing. JBW (talk) 22:12, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing, with no attempt whatever to improve in line with messages from editors expressing concerns. Most of the problems are well documented above, but I shall mention two particular problems. After you received relevant warnings on this page, you have made hundreds of edits of which this one is typical, making changes which have no effect on the displayed page. Above you have repeatedly stated that you have no intention of correcting large amounts of damage which you know you did, because you aren't willing to spend the time it would take, even though you are more than willing to spend huge amounts of time on doing further damaging editing. If you are to stand any chance at all of being allowed to return to editing you will have to do a pretty convincing job of making it clear that your future editing will be totally different from what you have done so far. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. JBW (talk) 11:24, 27 June 2021 (UTC) ,, please help

Hmmm I understand now.And I followed the guidelines .The future will not be so wrong in my contribution.I apologize.And requesting release from the blockade. Next time I will make a useful contribution And stay away from wrong contributions. I will refrain from editing interruptions And Wikipedia will be able to make a good contribution. Chief Minister      (Talk)   03:04, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Did you actually read the message I posted about the block before you posted your unblock request? If I had known you were going to make an unblock request that totally ignored everything I said then I could have saved myself a lot of trouble by just spending five seconds posting a ready-made generic block notice, instead of spending several minutes composing and editing a longer message in the hope of helping you understand the reasons for the block. JBW (talk) 22:16, 27 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi, I will never be free from the siege again.  Chief Minister      (Talk)   14:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

please unblock me. Chief Minister      (Talk)   19:15, 28 June 2021 (UTC)


 * If it's not appropriate for me to be commenting here please someone tell me to mind my own business, but I just wanted to say to anyone considering the unblock request: earlier asked the question, which remains unanswered, whether you are a returning editor and what previous usernames you might have edited under. The user's contributions history is indeed unusual, to put it mildly, for a new account (including jumping straight into editing their User:Vedbas/common.js). I don't know if edit history under earlier username(s) is relevant in the unblock context, but nevertheless I think Liz's question deserves an answer in order for us to see the full picture. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not a returning editor, I'm a new contributor.Vedbas (talk) 08:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Obviously, your behaviour suggests that you are not a new editor. Would you like to say us how you came to know how to revert others edits and how to install gadgets at common.js with your very early edits. For your information, checkusers can see which account have similar network, geolocation, user agent and browser with you, so you are not hidden on the internet. &mdash;  A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 13:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I actually went around this user's talk page when he made a very minor and flush edit to a cricket article recently created by me. &mdash;  A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 13:15, 29 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi I'm a MediaWiki developer because I have my own ideas about these.Which you may have noticed on my user thank you.Vedbas (talk) 13:38, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Advice relating to unblock requests
I will make just one more attempt to help you. If this doesn't make a significant difference then I doubt that anything I can say will. If you are to have any chance at all of being unblocked, you need to do the following. My final comment is to emphasise once again that if you are to be unblocked you must indicate that your editing will in future be totally different from what it was. Being unblocked so that you can go back to something similar to what you were doing, with a few minor changes, is not going to happen. JBW (talk) 20:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Re-read the guide to appealing blocks, assuming you have already read it. Your unblock requests have not come remotely near to complying with the advice there.
 * 2) Re-read all of the messages in which editors have expressed concerns about your editing, including the message I wrote when I blocked your account. Your unblock requests have not come remotely near to addressing the reasons for the block.
 * 3) Post an unblock request which actually addresses the reasons for the block, and which makes it clear that you thoroughly understand why you were blocked, and indicates that ''your future editing will be totally different from what you have done so far. Vague comments to the effect that you are sorry and won't do the same again, without indicating what you won't do again, are not going to work.
 * 4) Get yourself a signature which complies with the requirements of Signatures. At the very least, make your signature conform to the following two requirements: A customised signature should make it easy to identify your username and A customised signature should provide an easily identified link to your talk page. This is not one of the reasons for the block, but having a signature which does not help other editors is likely to add to the impression that you are an editor who is unwilling to edit collaboratively, which may influence any administrator reviewing an unblock request.

Why release me from the blockade? If I continue to edit like this, please block me at a later time without notice But if in any case I make a mistake, if it is a new job, give me a message to correct that mistake So I will correct that mistake.I understand that the edit I have been blocked for will not cause any harm or interruption, and will instead make useful contributions.I also understood the reasons for blocking me.I beg you to give me a chance and I want to make a good contribution and it will be completely different from the previous edit.My future edits will be completely different from what I have done so far And I beg you to give me a chance to free the block.I noticed the first notice to block JBW And I realized my editing was wrong.In the end I will refrain from the previous editing and through good editing I want to prove myself right once.I changed my signature.I apologize for all my mistakes Next I want to prove myself through good deeds that I will not make mistakes again next time.Vedbas (talk) 08:45, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Please unblock. Give me a chance. I understand my mistake.Vedbas (talk) 14:53, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

my Blocked for Disruptive editing And I followed the Disruptive editing guidelines And understood. I will not add any more disruptive editing elements to the encyclopedia.Vedbas (talk) 03:26, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Please release me from the block.Vedbas (talk) 13:11, 30 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Continual repetition of your request and pinging cannot make any admin more well-disposed towards you. If it has any effect at all it will be the opposite. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I will never be free from the siege again.Vedbas (talk) 10:17, 1 July 2021 (UTC)


 * I understand my mistake, I beg you to give me a chance, if I am unblocked I will create a new page and work according to Wikipedia rules. Please I apologize I beg you to give me a chance.Vedbas (talk) 05:45, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Vedbas, i don't want to appear negative, but i really don't think you do understand. You have ignored the advice of three or four experienced editors to be specific about what you did wrong, and have pinged people unhelpfully several times.  Please read this (i'll put each bit on its own line, so you can be sure to see it):
 * Say what you did wrong in the past.
 * Use your own words.
 * Be as clear and exact and precise as you can.
 * Do not say back that you will be good
 * Use the right form to ask for the block to be gone.
 * Do not ping all the time, or each time you write.
 * I fear that if you don't read and follow this advice, which is as simple and basic as i can get it, eventually you will be blocked even from this talk page. And that would be a pity. Happy days, LindsayHello 11:02, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

New request

 * (It's like deja vu all over again...) genuine question, and no criticism intended whatsoever — are you finding it difficult to express yourself in the English language, because you seem to be rehashing earlier arguments? If that is the problem here, then it might be unreasonable to expect you to come up with something original and eloquent for your appeal. (Of course, in that case it possibly also isn't a very good idea for you to be editing the English-language Wikipedia.) --DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Yes,I am not fluent in English, of course, so I have difficulty expressing myself .Vedbas (talk) 17:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You keep repeating, "Flush edits Freed from the siege". This makes no sense. Please say it in your language. -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 20:39, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * And if you can say it in your own language one of the good points about the English Wikipedia is that we have some editors who understand most languages with at least several million speakers, even though most editors suffer from the Anglo-American aversion to "foreign" languages. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:54, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * A chacun son goût -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 03:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)


 * ধন্যবাদ আমার ভাষায় প্রকাশ করতে দেওয়ার জন্য আমি হিন্দি ও বাংলা ভাষায় পারদর্শী।আমি বলতে চাইছি Flush edits এবং ধংসপ্রবনতা সম্পাদনা চালিয়ে যাওয়ার জন্য আমাকে অবরুদ্ধ করা হয়েছে এবং দক্ষ ব্যবহারকারীরা আমাকে সতর্ক করা শর্তে ও আমি একই সম্পাদনা চালিয়ে যাই। এইজন্য আমাকে অবরুদ্ধ করা হয়েছে। তবে আমাকে দক্ষ ব্যবহারকারীরা যখন তাদের সতর্ক বার্তা দিয়েছিলেন আমি বুঝতে পারি নাই। কারণ তখন আমার নোটিফিকেশন আসছিল বার বার কারন আমাকে অনেক ব্যবহারকারীরা আমাকে ধন্যবাদ জানাই এইজন্য। তবে আমি পরবর্তী সময়ে বুঝতে পারি এবং তখন দেখি আমাকে অবরুদ্ধ করা হয়েছে।পরে আমি অবরুদ্ধ করার গাইডলাইন অনুসরণ করেছি এবং বুঝতে পেরেছি আমার সম্পাদনা পদ্ধতি ভুল ছিল।আমি পরবর্তী সময়ে এই ধরনের সম্পাদনা করা থেকে বিরত থাকব এবং আমাকে অবরুদ্ধ থেকে মুক্ত করা হলে বর্তমান সম্পাদনা থেকে আগের সম্পাদনার কোন মিল থাকবে না।আমি নতুন করে বিভিন্ন পাতা তৈরি এবং বিষয়শ্রেণী যুক্ত এছাড়া পাতা সংশোধনের কাজ করতে চাই।আমি না বুঝে এইরকম সম্পাদনা চালিয়ে যাওয়ার জন্য দুঃখিত,আমি ক্ষমা প্রার্থনা করছি এবং আমাকে একটা সুযোগ দেওয়ার জন্য অনুরোধ করছি।Vedbas (talk) 05:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks.

Google translate--

What does "Flush" mean? -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 10:01, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Please see Vedbas (talk) 10:04, 12 July 2021 (UTC)


 * that's probably my fault, I was querying the hundreds of edits changing to (or v.v., can't remember!), which had no effect on anything (other than driving up edit count...). I called this 'flush' editing, although I don't think it strictly speaking is. My bad. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

I was blocked from editing this. I request you to check the contributions.I can get out of the ublock here? Vedbas (talk) 10:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * We're making progress, though your command of English might not be strong enough. Another admin will review and consider your request. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 10:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Okay.Vedbas (talk) 06:32, 13 July 2021 (UTC)


 * any administrator don't reviewed,It's been 4 days since. Please give me a chance to work by unblocking.Vedbas (talk) 17:39, 17 July 2021 (UTC)