User talk:Vedbas/Archive 1

Draftifying articles
Hello, Vedbas,

You have been editing for less than 2 weeks and have about 100 edits. You have no where near enough experience to be moving pages from main space to draft space. Please stop doing this until you have much, much more experience editing articles and are more familiar with Wikipedia policies, practices and standards.

If you have questions, please visit the Teahouse. Liz Read! Talk! 04:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay I understand thanks. Chief Minister  (Talk)  04:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Did I make a mistake somewhere in drafting? If you say a little. Chief Minister  (Talk)  04:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I asked you to stop draftifying articles but you persisted so I'm giving you a short block. You are a brand new editor and you are taking on responsibilities that editors with much more experience, like page reviewers, do. Once this draft expires, I recommend visiting Articles for Creation and ask to sign up for the training required. Liz Read! Talk! 04:59, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

I realized my mistake. Forgive me. I will not do this again until I become proficient. Chief Minister  (Talk)  05:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * It appears that you started moving articles from mainspace to draft space as soon as you were auto-confirmed, before doing any content-related editing. This raises the question of what topic area you came to edit in, or why you decided to do such a mostly obscure type of editing. I am not an admin and cannot unblock you, but I will ask what topic areas you plan to edit in when you are unblocked. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:47, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I am now planning to revise the article and add information. Chief Minister  (Talk)  05:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Advice
Hello, Vedbas,

While it might have seemed that my action was swift, you are a very new editor and you were acting very unusually. The short block was to get your attention. You draftified 18 articles in one day which is way, way more than even very experienced editors do and you knew enough about Speedy Deletion to tag the redirects from main space to draft space. It raises questions about whether you are a returning editor and what previous usernames you might have edited under. If continue like this, you will draw attention from other editors besides myself.

You don't have enough experience (days active and number of edits) yet but when you do, you might consider joining AFC Reviewers or the New Pages Patrol since you seem to have a good feeling for what constitutes a good article on Wikipedia.

You seem to already know quite a lot about Wikipedia practices and policies but consider visiting the Teahouse if other questions arise. Liz Read! Talk! 19:14, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Edward le Bas
Hello. Thanks for noticing the copyright violation on the above page. I removed the revision deletion template you placed and replaced it with a speedy deletion tag, under CSD G12. As it stands, there are no revisions on the page to delete, and no non-copyright content to restore save for a very brief (and honestly, insufficiently sourced) article. For cases like this, it is better to request deletion of the entire page. Thanks again! A S U K I T E 18:02, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , okay thanks,You can do this if you want  Chief Minister  (Talk)  18:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop doing AfD nominations
You are a new editor and you do not yet understand the deletion process for AfD. I can see two AfD nominations you have made using Speedy Deletion criteria: Articles for deletion/Vinit K. Bansal (Author) and Articles for deletion/Viy Cortez. Please stop doing these; Cortez is likely notably and it is clear you did not do a WP:BEFORE, and Bansal just needed to be Speedy Deleted rather than a week-loing AfD involving multiple editors. You have just been unblocked recently for draftifying articles too quickly. You need to slow down and learn how things work here, rather than charging into processes you do not yet understand. --- Possibly (talk) 04:32, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion/777 Charlie (2nd nomination) is also an improper nomination. --- Possibly (talk) 04:40, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , It's my fault I'm accepting  Chief Minister  (Talk)  04:43, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks. AFD is quite complicated. If you want to do speedy deletion nominations, you can use WP:Twinkle for that. But go very, very slowly, and learn how each criteria works before using it. You also need to give articles a minimum of ten minutes in article space for them to develop. You AfD'd the Vinit K. Bansal (Author) article three minutes after it was published. So take it slow. Thanks.--- Possibly (talk) 04:55, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I feel Vedbas is gaming the system by nominating an [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=StrongVPN&action=history article I created] within half an hour. PhotographyEdits (talk) 16:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * please wait I nominated it for promotion  please now your comment Articles for deletion/StrongVPN Chief Minister   (Talk)  16:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Problematic AFD
Your nomination Articles for deletion/Shashank Kumar was placed on a vandalised version of the page. I have reverted to a pre vandalism revision and closed the AFD. If you're not willing to do the WP:BEFORE & preliminary checks please don't make the AFD nomination. Cabayi (talk) 06:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I misread the history, the vandalism had started, but was still very subtle at the point where you nominated. Cabayi (talk) 07:07, 15 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks.Hi AutoWikiBrowser/Script please I'm requesting give me this access. Chief Minister   (Talk)  07:25, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser is the place to ask for AWB. Happy editing, Cabayi (talk) 08:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Capital city
I have just made two edits to this article and i see that i have entirely undone your edit; apologies if that feels bad. The categories you added were not appropriate, as i say in the summaries, because there's no reason to add specifically Cypriot categories to such a universal article, and because the "continental categories" you added are already within the main Category:Capitals; happy days, LindsayHello 19:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

WHY/What: Pearl.com
This is about your G11/Speedy on Pearl.com.

I note that you're a developer, hence contributing to Wiki in a way that is incomparable to what I'm doing, as an editor.

Briefly about myself and "history" - at one time I saw it as just memorizing dates (possibly just long enough to at least pass a test). I advanced, due to what I learned in a math class. What was stated from the front of the room was that 1732, as in 1.732, is the square root of three, and that one way to remember this is that George Washington was born in 1732.

Others may have heard that message. I heard a different one: 1732 is something to know as history. I learned something that day that is invaluable. Today I do have an interest in history; I should credit this to my parents, alas no longer in this world, both of whom showed a love for history.

My Pearl.com contribution is about history. I don't have any evidence that they still exist. Advertising it's not. A nomination for a regular AfD/Articles for Deletion is a point of view. A G11/Speedy seems to me as a calling out FIRE in a crowded theatre, and something that should be addressed by those in a position to do so, possibly noting the near-concurrent Speedy nomination of Rachel Goldman. Pi314m (talk) 11:37, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

please see hereI suggested deleting it because it was deleted earlier for the same reason ,I was wrong so an admin fixed it. Chief Minister      (Talk)   13:00, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Mohamed Abdullahi Omaar
Hello, I'd be interested to know your reason for reverting the constructive edit I made to this article; the statement "Omar belongs to a prominent family that hails from the Sa'ad Musa sub-division of the Habr Awal Isaaq clan." lacks any citation, and at any rate doesn't need to go above his parentage (as is the case in most articles, parentage comes first, with background on the family following if necessary). The citation given for the (poorly-worded/ nigh on incomprehensible) statement "His family was based in Hargeisa and reportedly have properties and estates in the city; the 6 piano neighborhood and the US Mission Headquarters belong to their family" is a dead link, that doesn't have an available archived version online. Therefore it is not acceptable as a citation. I am therefore confused as to why my edits were almost immediately reverted, and would appreciate some insight into your thought process. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.160.24 (talk) 14:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
I note that you have been warned and blocked in your short time here for jumping into areas where you are clearly not proficient. Today I see that you tagged Rachel Goldman for speedy deletion under WP:A7 although it contained many obvious indications of importance/significance. This is disruptive. Just add or correct some articles for the moment until you have become more aware of what our standards are, or you will find yourself blocked again. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Infobox images
I've noticed that you have added many images to infoboxes using incorrect syntax. The plain filename goes in the image parameter {e.g somephoto.jpg}. Any caption goes into the corresponding caption parameter. (Explained further in WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). It would be great if you would go back and fix these. MB 03:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks your comments.but I've added many articles to this article that need a long time to correct them, so next time I'll remember these things later when I add the image WP:INFOBOXIMAGE. Thank you MB. Chief Minister      (Talk)   04:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I don't understand your reply. First you said it would take a long tome to fix these because you added so many, then you said you would keep this in mind when adding future images. You went on to do other things but did not fix any of the images. Are you just going to leave these for others to fix? MB 17:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

No, I'm not leaving for others. I mean, it takes a long time to fix these articles, so I don't want to fix them. Next time I'll add the image keeping the rules in mind. Chief Minister      (Talk)   17:37, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * So, you say that you are not leaving this for others, but that you don't want to fix them. That's so obvious a contradiction that I would have thought that anyone would be embarrassed to say it. Just as I would have thought that anyone would be embarrassed to archive good advice without even bothering to reply. And you claim to be a Mediawiki developer? Phil Bridger (talk) 18:44, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

yes I'm Mediawiki developer.  Chief Minister      (Talk)   18:48, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * (after edit conflict) So does Mediawiki have developers who think so illogically as to simultaneously say "I'm not leaving for others" and "I don't want to fix them" and believe them both to be true? I despair. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:54, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I noticed your previous conversation, I saw that earlier that page was deleted for the same reason so I offered to delete it and after I gave you i realized that I had done something wrong, so thank you for giving me my mistake, and I was blocked to explain to me what Liz later said in his advice. Chief Minister      (Talk)   18:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

My ThanksYou followup to: WHY/What: Pearl.com

 * Thanks for your "I was wrong" response. That's a reminder to me that those in a higher position, in general, have what to teach. "I was wrong" reminds me of the Hebrew word 'GadLus' from the root word GaDoL/big/bigger/great (this msg being that not only are you ahead of me but, hopefully, you'll grow more). Once again, thanks for your response. Pi314m (talk) 01:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)