User talk:Veeesh

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! ttonyb1 (talk) 21:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Maizis & Miller Consultants
A tag has been placed on Maizis & Miller Consultants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 21:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maizis & Miller Consultants
A tag has been placed on Maizis & Miller Consultants, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Maizis & Miller Consultants and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pointillist (talk) 22:04, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

About notability and reliable sources
Thank you for trying to improve the Maizis & Miller Consultants article. To avoid criticism of the article, you need to prove that this business is sufficiently notable to deserve an encyclopedia entry. Have they done or achieved something unusual that has been recognised by the press? "Utilizing exclusive resources & the latest internet technologies, custom software, & social networking methods." isn't unusual, even if it is extraordinarily well executed. For detailed advice, see Notability (organizations and companies). I appreciate that you've been back to the article and added some more details to the existing references. Unfortunately, these references are not what we call "reliable sources"—one of them belongs to the company the article is about, and the other two are trade directories—because they haven't had independent editorial review (in the same way, wikipedia readers wouldn't see as advertisement in Business Week as being reliable, even though an editorial article would usually be very reliable). Good luck - Pointillist (talk) 00:09, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The article has been deleted again, I'm afraid. If you can develop a genuinely notable version let me know and I will give you a sense check before you move it into article space. - Pointillist (talk) 01:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)