User talk:Vegas949

First Federal Bank
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of First Federal Bank, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.1stfedbank.com/aboutParent.cfm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

First Federal Bank
A tag has been placed on First Federal Bank, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of First Federal Bank and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shootthedevgru (talk) 05:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

State National Bank
Another editor has added the  template to the article State National Bank, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Los Alamos National Bank
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Los Alamos National Bank, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.lanb.com/lanb/about.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:08, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Pioneer Bank
A tag has been placed on Pioneer Bank requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gary King (talk) 06:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Molander and Associates
The article Molander and Associates has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Bob Bresnahan
Another editor has added the  template to the article Bob Bresnahan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Removing Tags
Please stop removing improvement tags without addressing the concerns in the tags. Tags are there to help improve articles. I am placing the citation tag back on The Money Store article, please do not remove it unless you add references to the article.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 07:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Last I checked there were no sources, just an external link to the official site. But it seems that the article was speedy deleted... so the point is a moot now.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 07:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

The Money Store
Article had no verifiable independent sources to establish notability, and claimed discounted rates sourced only to the company. Capitalising MONEY STORE is also spammy. Content appeared to be list of directors and, bizarrely, a list of US states, nothing on the size of the company, amount lent etc. The lack of evidence of notability, combined with a degree of spamminess seemed enough for deletion. Jimfbleak (talk) 08:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Image placeholders
Per the outcome of Centralized discussion/Image placeholders, please do not add these to articles as long as there is no consensus for their usage.  Sandstein  07:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Deltron Event II
You've given a number of new tags to Deltron Event II without explaining why on the talk page. Could you please elaborate about why this article should be either improved or deleted? White 720 (talk) 14:40, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You added multiple tags, as I see you've done on many articles in a short span of time, to Deltron Event II. Is an expert's commentary really needed? Could you please identify the weasel words? The article has also survived an Articles for Deletion as it has numerous reliable, verifiable sources to back up this album's existence and notability. (The album is still delayed, but that alone is no reason to delete the article.) White 720 (talk) 14:48, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Utah Wikipedia Meetup
--Admrb♉ltz (talk) 22:31, 15 September 2008 (UTC) via AWB

Notability of Matthew Barzun
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Matthew Barzun, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Matthew Barzun seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Matthew Barzun, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Securities Industry Association
A tag has been placed on Securities Industry Association, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Acather96 (talk) 18:22, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Your addition to Security Industry Association has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Peter Karlsen (talk) 04:45, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Your addition to Bob Bresnahan has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Peter Karlsen (talk) 04:50, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Your addition to Dubuque Bank and Trust has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Peter Karlsen (talk) 06:42, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Your addition to Los Alamos National Bank has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Peter Karlsen (talk) 06:55, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Contributor copyright investigation
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. --Peter Karlsen (talk) 07:17, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

UK spelling
Please do not change UK to US spelling in an article concerning a UK subject, as you did here. Thanks, Ericoides (talk) 23:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Thomas More edit
I'm not sure what the purpose of your edit in Thomas More was - in removing the syntactic dash you altered the grammar. I reverted your edit, because the result was significantly less readable. If you still believe that needs to be changed, please discuss it in the talk page. Thanks, Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 00:01, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

United States Bill of Rights has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for June 2011
As one of the editors who has made improvements to the United States Bill of Rights article recently this notice has been left to inform you that it has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for June 2011. The goal this month is to get this article to Good Article standards or better by July 4th, 2011. You can also vote for next months article of the Month or submit a candidate for article of the month here. --Kumioko (talk) 02:28, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Vegas949/Kenneth A. Hersh has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kenneth A. Hersh, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 18:54, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello! I just wanted to let you know that I moved it there by mistake. I actually meant to go live immediately. Could you please disregard? Thank you!

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sceptre (talk) 20:40, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Weird first letter on American businessman articles
What's up with the weird first letter you're leaving behind on American businessman articles? Please prevent that from happening.ĠĤ Could you go behind yourself and check to make sure there aren't any more? Jesanj (talk) 17:57, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!

December 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to William Keith Maxwell III. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. ''It appears to me that you are unnecessarily changing between the last name of Mr. Maxwell and the pronoun "he" everyy month. Is there are particular reason why you are doing this? Your edit summaries are not indicating why.'' Phearson (talk) 19:55, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! I should have marked them as minor edits. My apologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vegas949 (talk • contribs)


 * That does not answer my question, why are you frequently changing between "he" and "Maxwell"? Phearson (talk) 02:40, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your question. I am trying to add variety. I think it sounds awkward to use "Maxwell" over and over.

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In NRG Energy, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Northeast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Valero Energy Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Coast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Petro-Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upstream (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kenneth A. Hersh concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kenneth A. Hersh, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:04, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Kenneth A. Hersh


Hello Vegas949. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Kenneth A. Hersh.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:04, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)