User talk:Velalash89ko

l

Disruptive editing
Take your concerns to the talk page to reach consensus instead of edit warring at Heraclius with theological propaganda that is rejected by historians, thanks. --HistoryofIran (talk) 21:05, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Do you even know the meaning of theology? And why re you calling it propaganda? I am just taking some of the sources mention in the bottom and adding on the lede. I understand your hatred towards it.
 * Yes I do know what theology is, and I don't have any hatred towards anything either, I am just tired of people who refuse to understand anything and only specialize in spamming fairy stories into well-written articles. --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * No you don't. You might say religious, theology has nothing to do with it. These are the truth and not fairy tales, and I even not added them, it is you who is randomly twisting the discussion, btw did you see the changes done now with those sources?
 * I'd like to say theological. Funny, because modern scholars actually educated in these fields disagree with you. Fairy tales indeed, see the talk page. --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:30, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Go to see the meaning of theology, which is mostly attributed with God. I disagree with those modern scholars and they are humans too.....are Muslim historians deceitful then? Again, why are you discussing about it? That's why I wrote in a different way.--Velalash89ko (talk) 22:36, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

User:HistoryofIran, you have to rever this edit on Khosrow II. Both Byzantium and Persia have been worse btw lol. Velalash89ko (talk) 23:53, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Warning, edit warring on Heraclius
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:22, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Warning
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Heraclius. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:49, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello. But she offended me by saying "ur bullshit" when I was using religious words Velalash89ko (talk) 23:52, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Advice
I strongly suggest you not edit to harass another editor. That can get you blocked. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:09, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for personal attacks and harassment. Also, this is not a Muslim or any other religious-affiliated website — peace be unto him is not part of Wikipedia's civility policy and you altering the comment of another user to add it (more than once) to their own words is strictly forbidden. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 02:44, 6 October 2019 (UTC)