User talk:Velocirachael/sandbox

Rachael! Am I even doing this right? I reviewed your article! Great job on your article! You have a really strong, valid, and important aspect to add to this Wikipedia page!! I'm super excited about your addition!!!

1.	First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? I love your addition of the critique of the waves in feminism. It was something so new to me this semester, and I think it’s a really important addition to the History of Feminism page. I really loved the quote, “All feminists are suffragists, but not all suffragists are feminists”!

2.	What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? Make sure to think about reviewing the following sections: Lead, organization, balance, neutral content, sources. I honestly think your addition to the article is really good. You have a perfect lead, and you manage to keep your content completely neutral, I think that’s really hard for a feminist with strong views!

3.	What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? The only thing I would suggest, if possible, is to maybe find a couple more sources that critique the waves. I personally feel like more articles to back this idea would strengthen your edit.

4.	Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know! I wish something from your article was applicable to mine. I think the Feminist Art Movement is too specific. Aecimaru (talk) 04:17, 3 December 2016 (UTC)