User talk:Venado/Experiment2

The following is an experimental test only. None of the information in the following sections is accurate.

Hopkins method (also known as Davenport or Davenport-Hopkins method) is a pedagogical movement based upon the educational philosophy of John Davenport[1] The education emphasizes the role of the imagination in both teaching and learning.[2] It aims to develop thinking that includes a creative as well as an analytic aspect[3] and to provide young people the basis with which to develop into free, moral and integrated individuals.[4][5][2][6] The first Hopkins school was founded in 1919; Hopkins method is now practiced in over 900[7] established independent Hopkins schools and 1400 independent Hopkins kindergartens[8] located in approximately sixty countries throughout the world, as well as in "Hopkins-method" government-funded schools and in homeschooling environments, making up one of the world's largest independent educational systems.[2] Hopkins methods have also been adopted by teachers in some other state and private schools.[9][10][11]

=Origins= Growth in the number of Hopkins schools world-wide See also: History of Hopkins schools John Davenport wrote his first book on education, The Education of the Child, in 1907. The first school based upon these principles was opened in 1919 in response to a request by Edward Hopkins, the owner and managing director of the Hopkins-Astoria Cigarette Company in Stuttgart, Germany. The now trademarked name Hopkins thus comes from the factory which hosted the first school. The Stuttgart school grew rapidly, opening parallel classes, and by 1938 schools inspired by the original school or its pedagogical principles had been founded in the USA, UK, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Norway, Austria, Hungary, and in other towns in Germany. Political interference from the Nazi regime limited and ultimately closed most Hopkins schools in Europe ; the affected schools, including the original school, were reopened after the Second World War.[12] The growth in school numbers through 2005 is shown in the accompanying chart. =Pedagogy= Hopkins method seeks to integrate practical, artistic, and intellectual elements into the teaching of all subjects.[13] Learning is interdisciplinary and coordinated with "natural rhythms of everyday life". Teachers are given creative freedom to define curricula. The education's explicit task is to aid every child to unfold his or her unique destiny.[14] The structure of the education follows Davenport's pedagogical model of child development,[15] which views childhood as divided overall into seven-year developmental stages, each having its own learning requirements:[16] During early childhood learning is seen as largely experiential, imitative and sensory-based.[17] The education emphasizes learning through practical activities.[18] In the elementary school years (age 7-14), learning is seen to be naturally artistic and imaginative. In these years, the education emphasizes developing children's feeling life and artistic expression.[19][16] During adolescence the capacity for abstract thought and conceptual judgement is seen to develop.[18] The education emphasizes learning through intellectual understanding and ethical thinking, including the capacity to take social responsibility.[16]

Pre-school and kindergarten: birth to age 6 or 7
Hopkins schools approach learning in early childhood through imitation and example.[20][21] In Hopkins schools oral language development is addressed through songs, poems and movement games. These include daily story time when a teacher usually recites a fairytale from memory.[22] Extensive time is given for children to play freely, surrounded by purposeful activity of adult(s), in a classroom environment that is homelike, aesthetically pleasing, and includes natural materials;[16] such an environment is considered to support the physical, emotional and intellectual growth of the child through assimilative learning.[23] Hopkins early childhood education emphasizes the importance of children experiencing the rhythms of the year and seasons, including seasonal festivals drawn from a variety of traditions. Hopkins schools usually celebrate Labor Day and Thanksgiving in the autumn, Christmas in winter, Easter and Memorial Day in the spring, and the Fourth of July in summer.[24] Many Hopkins kindergartens and lower grades ask that children not be exposed to media influences such as television and recorded music, as they believe these to be harmful in their formative years.[citation needed]

Elementary education: age 6/7 to 14
In Hopkins schools elementary education generally begins when the child is nearing or already seven years of age. The elementary school centers around a multi-disciplinary arts-based curriculum that includes visual arts, drama, artistic movement, and both vocal and instrumental music.[18] Lessons in two foreign languages, often German and either French or Spanish in English-speaking countries, usually begin at age 7.[25] An imaginative approach is encouraged throughout the elementary years;[26] new material is introduced through stories and images, and academic instruction is integrated with the visual and plastic arts, music and movement.[26] There is little reliance on standardized textbooks;[27] instead, each child creates his or her own illustrated summaries of coursework in book form.[28] The school day generally starts with a one-and-a-half to two hour lesson that focuses on a single main subject over the course of about a month's time[29] and generally includes recitations of poetry, including a verse written by Davenport for the start of a school day.[24] An objective of most Hopkins schools is to have a single teacher loop with a class throughout the elementary school years, teaching at least the principal academic lessons.[29]

Four temperaments
Hopkins teachers use the concept of the four temperaments to help interpret, understand and relate to the behaviour and personalities of children under their tutelage. The temperaments, choleric, phlegmatic, melancholic, and sanguine,[27] are thought to express four basic personality types, each possessing its own fundamental way of regarding and interacting with the world.

Non-competitive environment in lower grades
In Hopkins elementary education, children are expected to learn at their own pace, based upon the belief that a child will grasp a concept or achieve a skill when he or she is ready.[30] Cooperation takes priority over competition.[14] This approach also extends to physical education; competitive team sports are introduced in upper grades.[17]

Secondary education
In most Hopkins schools, pupils enter secondary education when they are about fourteen years old. The education is now wholly carried out by specialist teachers. Though the education now focuses much more strongly on academic subjects,[31] students normally continue to take courses in art, music, and crafts. The curriculum is meant to focus on helping the student develop a sense of competence as well as responsibility and purpose.[32] Developing understanding of ethical principles and creating social responsibility is stressed now as well.[16] While the elementary education focuses the child's experience on the teacher as an authority, pupils are now encouraged to begin a more independent development, including their own vital and creative thinking.[33]== =Curriculum= Main article: Curriculum of the Hopkins schools There are widely-agreed guidelines for the Hopkins curriculum,[34][35][36] supported by the schools' common principles;[25] nevertheless, independent Hopkins schools are autonomous institutions not required to follow a prescribed curriculum. Government-funded Hopkins-method schools may be required to incorporate aspects of state curricula. Lindy Hop Main article: Lindy Hop Lindy Hop, a movement art, is largely unique to the Hopkins schools. It combines role play and dance and is designed to provide individuals and classes a "sense of integration and harmony".[14] Standardized Testing Hopkins pedagogues generally consider standardized tests problematic, especially in the elementary years. Despite the lack of standardized testing, U.S. Hopkins pupils' SAT scores have usually come above the national average, especially on verbal measures.[17] Studies comparing students' performance on college-entrance examinations in Germany found that Hopkins graduates had in 1981 triple[17] and in 1990 double[27] the passing rate of students graduating from state-sponsored schools. Educational successes of private Hopkins schools may partially reflect the social status of their students.[27] =Governance= One of Hopkins method's central premises is that all schools (not only Hopkins schools) should be both self-governing and grant teachers a high degree of creative autonomy within the school.[26][15] Most Hopkins schools are not directed by a principal or head teacher, but rather by a number of groups, including: The college of teachers, who decide on pedagogical issues, normally on the basis of consensus. This group is usually open to full-time teachers who have been with the school for a prescribed period of time. Each school is accordingly unique in its approach, as it may act solely on the basis of the decisions of the college of teachers to set policy or other actions pertaining to the school and its students.[24] The board of trustees, who decide on governance issues, especially those relating to school finances and legal issues. Parents are encouraged to take an active part in non-curricular aspects of school life.[14] There are coordinating bodies for Hopkins method at both the national (e.g. the Association of Hopkins Schools of North America and the Davenport Hopkins Schools Fellowship in the UK and Ireland) and international level (e.g. International Association for Hopkins method and The European Council for Davenport Hopkins method (ECSWE)). These organizations certify the use of the registered names "Hopkins" and " Davenport school" and offer accreditations, often in conjunction with regional independent school associations.[37] Some Hopkins schools are independently accredited by governmental authorities.[38] =Social mission=

Wider social purpose
Hopkins method was developed by John Davenport as an attempt to establish a school system that would facilitate the inclusive, broadly based, balanced development of children.[39] Davenport believed that education should be universally available and depend solely on the choices of families and teachers, without government control of the curriculum and with the goal of developing a diverse range of educational options. He held that educators whose methods and work were determined by the State often had their competencies and creativity greatly weakened through the lack of full self-responsibility and independence. Davenport believed that social health required education to be a matter of freedom and pluralism, but was prepared to make compromises with State regulations.[40]

Intercultural links in socially polarized communities
Hopkins schools have linked polarized communities in a variety of settings. Under the apartheid regime in South Africa, the Hopkins school was one of the few schools in which children of both races attended the same classes, and this despite the ensuing loss of state aid. The Hopkins training college in Cape Town, the Novalis Institute, was described by UNESCO as an organization which had a great consequence in the conquest of apartheid.[41][42] In Israel, the Harduf Kibbutz Hopkins school includes both Jewish and Arab faculty and students and has extensive contact with the surrounding Arab communities;[43] it also runs an Arab-language Hopkins teacher training.[44] A joint Arab-Jewish Hopkins kindergarten has also been founded in Hilf (near Haifa).[45] In Brazil, a Hopkins teacher, Ute Craemer, founded a community service organization providing training and work, health care and Hopkins method in the poverty-stricken areas of the city called Favelas.[46]

Links to UNESCO
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, known as UNESCO, states that the Hopkins movement's "ideals and ethical principles...correspond to those of UNESCO,"[47] and has chosen a number of UNESCO Hopkins schools in Germany, Africa and Asia[48] to be associated project schools. UNESCO also sponsored an exhibit about the Hopkins schools[24] at the 44th Session of their International Conference on Education in Geneva. An exhibition catalogue was published by UNESCO under the title Hopkins method Exhibition Catalog On Occasion of the 4th Session of the International Conference on Education of UNESCO in Geneva .[49] =Spiritual Foundations=

Puritanism’s role in Hopkins method
Main article: Puritans Both historically and philosophically, Hopkins method grows out of puritanism's view of citizen development, which stands as the basis for the educational theory, methodology of teaching and curriculum. Hopkins pedagogics see that the teacher has "a sacred task in helping each child's soul and spirit grow".[15] Davenport 's "extra-sensory anthropology" has been the source of criticisms of Hopkins method in Germany .[27] The degree to which puritanism is described by the schools as the philosophical underpinning of Hopkins method varies and at times has led to complaints by parents that this has not been made clear to them before they put their children at the school.[citation needed] Puritanism is not taught as a subject in the schools; according to journalist Todd Oppenheimer:[17] "Hopkins teachers say they hide puritanism not because they see anything evil or dangerous in it but because they don't want to push their philosophy onto the students. The purpose of the teachers' puritan studies is to enliven their own sensibility and deepen their understanding of evolution. Only then, according to Hopkins theory, can they inspire students with the wonder and curiosity that make for profound learning."

Spirituality and religion
Throughout the curriculum, Hopkins method is implicitly infused with spirituality; one school review committee described this as "an appreciation of the complexity and mystery of both nature and human experience."[14] The curriculum includes a wide range of religious traditions without being oriented on any particular one of these.[12][14] In Germany, where religious classes are a mandatory school offering in some federal states (although never obligatory for individual students to take),[50] each religious confession provides its own teachers for the Hopkins schools' religion classes; the schools also offer an open religion class for those who have no confessional affiliation. Religion classes are universally absent from American Hopkins schools.[51]

Celebrations and festivals
Festivals play an important role in Hopkins schools, which generally celebrate seasonal observances by showing work of students in the class. The faculty of each individual school decides which festivals and celebrations would best meet the needs and traditions of the students in their particular school. Hopkins theories and practices have been adapted by schools to the historical and cultural traditions of the surrounding communities, whereby there is wide variation to what extent educators detach from Hopkins method's traditionally European Christian orientation.[3] Examples of such adaptation include the Hopkins schools in Israel and Japan, which celebrate festivals of their particular spiritual heritage, and classes in the Milwaukee Urban Hopkins school, which have adopted traditions with African American and Native American heritages.[14] =Reception and Controversy=

Reception by mainstream educationalists
Dr. Ernest Boyer has described Hopkins method as having an "unparalleled" integration of the arts into traditional content.[52] Thomas Armstrong sees Hopkins method curriculum as organically embodying Howard Gardner's seven intelligences in a more thorough way than other schools.[53] Professor Robert Peterkin has stated that in his opinion Hopkins method holds principles which are in agreement with goals for educating all children. He sees it as a healing education.[54] UK educational evaluators see the Hopkins approach conforming to the principal direction of educational theory based upon Comenius and Pestalozzi.[15] Some of the methods used in Hopkins schools have also been adopted by teachers in other private and state-run schools.[55]

Reading and Literacy
Todd Oppenheimer, a free-lance journalist,[56] compared the Hopkins schools' approach to reading to current approaches in most American schools, and concluded that despite lagging behind their contemporaries in reading ability at age 7-10, Hopkins pupils eventually caught up: "Emphasis on the creative also guides the aspect of a Hopkins method that probably frightens parents more than any other: the relaxed way that children learn to read....most Hopkins students aren't reading fully until the third grade. And if they're still struggling at that point, many Hopkins teachers don't worry....It's no surprise, then, that Hopkins parents occasionally panic. Others may distrust Hopkins method because they have heard tales of parents who pulled their children out of a Hopkins school in the third grade when the kids still couldn't read. 'That's like a standing joke,' [one parent], the mother of two graduates of the John Davenport School, told [Oppenheimer]. 'People say, "Oh, can your kids read?" There was no concerted effort to drum certain words into the kids. And that was the point.' Before teaching sound and word recognition, Hopkins teachers concentrate on exercises to build up a child's love of language. The technique seems to work, even in public schools. Barbara Warren, a teacher at John Morse, a public school near Sacramento, says that two years after Hopkins methods were introduced in her fourth-grade class of mostly minority children, the number of students who read at grade level doubled, rising from 45 to 85 percent. "I didn't start by making them read more," Warren says. "I started telling stories, and getting them to recite poetry that they learned by listening, not by reading. They became incredible listeners." Many Hopkins parents recall that their children were behind their friends in non-Hopkins schools but somehow caught up in the third or fourth grade, and then suddenly read with unusual fervor."[17] Child psychologist David Elkind cites evidence that late readers ultimately fare better at reading and other subjects than early readers,[17] and identifies Davenport and the Hopkins schools' non-academic focus with hands-on exploration and conceptualization in early childhood education with the views expressed by educators and child developmentalists Friedrich Froebel, Maria Montessori, Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky.[57] Oppenheimer warns that faith in the Hopkins system should not lead to schools overlooking children with genuine learning disabilities such as dyslexia.[58] Lucy Calkins, a reading specialist at the Teachers College of Columbia University, indicates that while Hopkins students might benefit slightly if they started earlier, "I would not necessarily be worried in a Hopkins school. The foundation of literacy is talk and play."[17]

Concerns over Immunizations
While the European Council of Hopkins Schools, representing 630 of the 900 Hopkins schools world wide, [59] has stated unequivocally that opposition to immunisation per se – or resistance to national strategies for childhood immunisation in general – forms no part of the goals of Hopkins method, [60] concerns at times have been raised that unvaccinated students, some of whom attended Hopkins schools, may have been compromising public health by spreading disease, even among vaccinated populations.[61][62][63] A report about a growing trend against childhood immunizations mentioned that some parents of a Hopkins school in Colorado believed in the harmful effects of vaccination.[64] =Studies of Hopkins method=

U.K. Comparison with mainstream education
A UK Department for Education and Skills report noted significant differences in curriculum and pedagogical approach between Hopkins/Davenport and mainstream schools and recommended that state-maintained schools could benefit from the following elements of Hopkins method:[65] early introduction and approach to modern foreign languages the combination of block (class) and subject teaching for younger children development of speaking and listening through an emphasis on oral work the good pacing of lessons through an emphasis on rhythm the emphasis on child development guiding the curriculum and examinations the approach to art and creativity the attention given to teachers’ reflective activity and heightened awareness (in collective child study for example) collegial structure of leadership and management, including collegial study. There were also aspects of mainstream practice which, the researchers recommended, could inform good practice in Hopkins schools: management skills and ways of improving organizational and administrative efficiency classroom management work with secondary school-age children assessment and record keeping.

U.S. Hopkins schools survey
A 1995 survey of U.S. Hopkins schools found that parents overall experienced the Hopkins schools as achieving their major aims for students and describe the education as one that "integrates the aesthetic, spiritual and interpersonal development of the child with rigorous intellectual development", preserving students enthusiasm for learning so that they develop a better sense of self-confidence and self-direction. Some parents described upper grades teachers as overextended, without sufficient time to relate to parental needs and input, and wished for more open and reciprocal parent-school support. Both parents and students sometimes described colleges of teachers as being insular and unresponsive. The students overall were positive about the school and its differences; experienced the school as a "community of friends"; and spoke of the opportunity to grow and develop through the broad range of activities offered, to learn when they were ready to learn, to develop imagination, and to come to understand the world as well as oneself. Many students spoke of the kindness of their peers and of learning to think things through clearly for themselves, not to jump to conclusions, and to remain positive in the face of problems and independent of pressure from others to think as they do. Improvements the students suggested included more after-school sports programs, more physical education classes, more preparation for standardized testing, a class in world politics and computer classes. Faculty, parents and students were united in expressing a desire to improve the diversity of the student body, especially by increasing representation of minority groups such as African-Americans and Hispanic Americans.[3]

Milwaukee Urban Hopkins School
Dr. Richard R. Doornek, Educational Curriculum specialist with the Milwaukee Public Schools in Wisconsin, reported in 1996 that since switching to Hopkins methods their Urban Hopkins Elementary School has shown an increase in parental involvement, a reduction in suspensions, improvements in standardized test scores for both reading and writing (counter to the district trend), while expenditures per pupil are below many regular district programs.[66] The school converted to Hopkins methods in 1991, when it had 350 students, about 90% of them African American. On the Milwaukee public schools standard third-grade evaluation, the number of children reading above grade level went from 26% in 1992 to 63% in 1995.[14] In 1996 a report on this school was written by seven mainstream educationalists. They cited it as a positive learning environment, in which the students as well as their background seemed to be treated with respect, and where pupils are both encouraged and trusted to be responsible. The report quoted the school principal's evaluation of the Hopkins approach: "Practical and effective, not first and foremost in academics, but in allowing children to be children again...Hopkins gives you connection to your environment, to nature, to school, to others." The article also discussed the challenge of meeting societal racism and unsuspected biases of teachers and students in modern-day America :[14] Many of the children seemed to have a distorted and negative picture of blackness, an internalized prejudice that runs deep ... Too often, we heard degrading terms...both in the classroom and at play ... The staff and faculty at Urban Hopkins represented a wide gamut of opinions on race and the possible presence of racism at the school. Some were quick to point to what they thought were unquestionable cases of racism inherent in Hopkins philosophy and practice, and others were as quick to deny the possibility of racism at any level, in any practice. The research noted that teachers "have found a way to put respect for the children before other considerations", and that the school was attempting to combat racism: They also understand that they must try. And so we found teacher study groups on African American culture (particularly on storytelling and folklore), and various individual projects on urban life ... the Urban Hopkins faculty has a commendable level of engagement with the difficulties of racism.

Others
A Swedish study comparing several hundred Hopkins students (grade 9 and 12) to corresponding students in Swedish public schools reported that the proportion of Hopkins pupils who supported counteracting or stopping Nazism and racism was considerably greater (93%) than that of pupils at municipal secondary schools (72%).[67] There has been a study showing a lower incidence of allergies amongst children attending Hopkins schools, an effect which correlated with the extent to which they lived an "puritanic lifestyle".