User talk:Veni Markovski

Image copyright problem with Image:Stefan_tafrov_un.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stefan_tafrov_un.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 22:08, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!
it's a fun place to hang out.... --Alvestrand 04:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I know :) Veni 20:05, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Macedonian alphabet
Hey man, do you have a source for the addition you just made to Macedonian alphabet? I'd not read that before. - FrancisTyers · 15:13, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Veni 19:13, 11 August 2006 (UTC) :

Yes, I do. My Grandfather was one of the creators of the alphabet. Venko Markovski. He wrote it in a book, "Blood is thiker than water" (Kravta voda ne stava in Bulgarian). Here's the part from it (in Bulgarian) that describes it:

Президиумът на Народното събрание в Македония, съставен от членове, между които бяха Методи Андонов-Ченто, Павел Шатев, Панко Брашнаров и други, образува комисия, коя­то да представи в окончателен вид македонската азбука. В тая комисия влизах и аз. На заседанията на комисията аз се срещнах лице с лице с истината. Две тенденции, ясни, категорични, непримирими, воюваха. Битка се водеше около ер-голяма (ъ). Едната тенденция, застъпвана от хора със съмнително минало и неспециалисти, воюваше за сръбската азбука, като се изхвърли буквата ер-голям (ъ), а за съчетанията кь, гь, дз се измислят три съвсем нови букви. Тази тенденция се застъпваше от по-голямата част от комисията. Другата тенденция, застъпвана от хора литератори – учени и лингвисти, но с непоколебимо българско съзнание, воюваше за въвеждане на буквите ер-голям (ъ) и ер-малък (ь) и от­хвърли измислянето на двете нови букви, доказвайки, че ер-малъкът е способен да изпълнява тяхната функция, а за дз да се създаде буква, подобна на латинското S. Тази тенденция застъпвах и аз. След дълги остри спорове се взе компромисно решение. Въведе се ер-голямът (ъ). Отпадна ер-малъкът (ь). Измислиха се две съвсем нови букви. А за дз се прие буква, подобна на латинското S. Въвеждането на ер-голяма (ъ) беше победа. Но тази победа за мене същевременно беше първото поражение на моята заблуда. Македонската азбука с ер-голям (ъ) бе отхвърлена в ЦК на ЮКП от Александър Белич и Милован Джилас.

It says that the first commission implemented the so-called "R-goliama" (the leter Ъ), they've removed the "r-malak" (ь), they accepted the "s" for "dz", and they've created two new letters. But this alphabet was vetoed by Alexander Belic and Milovan Djilas in Belgrade.

Macedonian Alphabet revision
Hi Veni :) I have tried to redo the Macedonian alphabet entry, but before I post it I want to make sure it's not too controversial or wrong. I have tried to keep it very neutral and stick to the alphabet (and not get into the whole Macedonian v Bulgarian debate), but if you have any other information -- especially about the committees which formed the alphabet -- that would be great. I am not Macedonian/Bulgarian/Serbian, so any errors are made in good faith and/or ignorance!!

I'd be interested to get your comments about the new article, I have the draft at User:AWN2/sandbox.

Cheers, AWN AWN2 03:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi Veni, How is the updating coming along? I am going to try and post the article soon. Do you have any references for the bit about Milovan Đilas and Edvard Kardelj and them wanting a less Bulgarian-style alphabet? Cheers AWN AWN2 07:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Go ahead and publish it. Refer to my Grandfather about Djilas/Kardel. Veni 02:58, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Isoc bulgaria logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Isoc bulgaria logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:GeorgeGreve.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GeorgeGreve.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's better, thanks for clarifying. J Milburn (talk) 22:59, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Planning Discussions Now Ongoing Regarding DC Meetup #8
You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future.

There is a planning discussion taking place here for DC Meetup #8. If you don't wish to receive this message again, please let me know.

--User:Nbahn 04:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Planning Discussions Now Ongoing Regarding DC Meetup #8
You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future.

There is a planning discussion taking place here for DC Meetup #8. If you don't wish to receive this message again, please let me know.

--User:Nbahn 04:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Planning Discussions Now Ongoing Regarding DC Meetup #9
You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future.

There is a planning discussion taking place here for DC Meetup #9. If you don't wish to receive this message again, please let me know. --NBahn (talk) 04:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Planning Discussions Now Finished Regarding DC Meetup #9
--NBahn (talk) 02:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.
 * Planning — for the most part, anyway — is now finished (see here) for DC Meetup #9.

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Veni Markovski! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:17, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Stefan Tafrov -

Planning Discussions Now Underway Regarding DC Meetup #10

 * You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.
 * Please be advised that planning is now underway (see here) for DC Meetup #10. --NBahn (talk) 15:25, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Meetup/DC 11
Hey, just in case you missed it, there is an oppurtunity to get a free dinner this Tuesday August 11 and a chance to meet and hang out talk about WikiProject United States Public Policy and WP:GLAM/SI. Sorry that this is so late in the game, I was hoping the e-mail would be a better form of contact for active members (if you want to get on the e-mail list send me an User e-mail ). Hope that you can attend, User:Sadads (talk)12:42, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

DC Meetup #12
An off-wiki discussion is taking place concerning DC Meetup #12. Watch this page for announcements.

—NBahn (talk) 04:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

P.S. You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.

File:Veni Markovski.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Veni Markovski.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:54, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lyudmila Radkova


A tag has been placed on Lyudmila Radkova requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. St0n3 BG (talk) 01:15, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniela Radkova


A tag has been placed on Daniela Radkova requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. St0n3 BG (talk) 01:15, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Sadowsky.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Sadowsky.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:10, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Isoc-bg-logo.gif


The file File:Isoc-bg-logo.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 02:22, 16 December 2018 (UTC)