User talk:VenkateshManickavasagam

Placing external links and footnotes
Hi, VenkateshManickavasagam, I noticed that you were placing external links into the lead summarizing the article, that other editors were removing them without sufficient explanation.

I can empathize with this. My very first edit was a creation of an article in which I use citations that were not in accord with Wikipedia's citation style.

We seldom place plain external links into the lead, & often limit the number of references or footnotes in the lead because it is the introduction or summary to the article.

To help you going forward, I would advise that you read some of these help & guideline pages:


 * Help:Footnotes
 * Help:External links and references
 * Citing sources
 * Inline citation
 * Manual of Style/Linking

May you have happy & fruitful editing!

Peaceray (talk) 16:26, 5 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello VenkateshManickavasagam, thank you for trying to improve Wikipedia. But references are usually put directly after the content they verify (please see the helpful links provided above and WP:Referencing for beginners). Also, the current beta situation is already mentioned and sourced in the infobox on the top of the article. Hope these tips are helpful, but if you have any questions about Wikipedia editing, please feel free to ask at WP:Teahouse anytime. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 09:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Osiz Technologies (September 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AviationFreak were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Osiz Technologies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Osiz Technologies, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Osiz_Technologies Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AviationFreak&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Osiz_Technologies reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AviationFreak 💬 16:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello VenkateshManickavasagam. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:VenkateshManickavasagam. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Osiz Technologies


The page Draft:Osiz Technologies has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)