User talk:Vensatry/Archive 5

Re: Thanks
You are welcome :-) The link only says that the Tiruchirappalli UA includes the municipal corporation and the municipalities mentioned in the list. A 2003 book gives stats on Trichy's area. We need a link which explicitly states that Tiruchi's area is 140-odd square kilometres. On my part, I, too, shall make a search. By the way, I've raised the issue on the India discussion page.- Ravi My Tea Kadai 16:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

A doubt
Why does this list not include Visakhapatnam?- Ravi My Tea Kadai 16:51, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 18:29, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Chennai
Hey, sorry man. The edit you made was just two minutes before my revert so it got added along. Anyway, thanks for the contribution.  Secret of success  Talk to me  14:40, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * No issues. I didn't see the "unconstructive edits". -- Commander (Ping Me) 09:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

objection my lord :-)
regarding this. IMO Agni natchathiram is more landmark than Anjali.--Sodabottle (talk) 08:57, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * How could that be! Agni Natchathiram was a super hit, but it's not a landmark film in Mani's career. Unlike Anjali, the film did not win any major award or acclaim. Correct me if am wrong. -- Commander (Ping Me) 09:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

South filmfare Awards
I have a copy of the same with me. Rajeshbieee (talk) 15:22, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I have many copies with me, but I do not have all. I think we have to visit filmfare office for the missing references.Rajeshbieee (talk) 15:39, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * No, I bought it when it was published. You can even get old filmfare magazies from Old waste paper marts (If you are lucky)Rajeshbieee (talk) 15:45, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

cbe population problem
I have undone your edits and left an explanation here - Talk:Coimbatore. Please read it, if you still disagree, we need to thrash something out.--Sodabottle (talk) 16:50, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Don' t overdo
You are over doin tamil activities and ignoring facts.Check with references.59.161.189.79 (talk) 17:33, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * What are you trying to say. Please be more specific. -- Commander (Ping Me) 16:21, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Support
Kindly express your support for deletion Articles for deletion/Singam 2.  Secret of success  Talk to me  14:09, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK for List of international cricket centuries by Matthew Hayden
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 November2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Shriya GA
That was a hard fought battle, let me tell you. Not this time, but the last GA nomination, and all the work to improve it from then till now. I would like to attack a couple other articles like DDLJ, which I started on, but I just can't find enough sources to do it justice. Today I am in a battle (I am not sure why) over scripts on Talk:Katrina_Kaif. BollyJeff ||  talk  19:34, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Karthi
Karthi's page has been copy-edited a second time and I am absolutely not happy with it. I may even say the editor has butchered the article. All citations have been changed to "he said" and "he wrote", makes the article sound monotonous...and so many paragraphs. He has simply removed some claims (that were not false!), no idea why he did so. And as if that was not enough, he himself has added grammar/spelling mistakes or overlooked them. Horrible copy-editing this is! On the other hand, compare it to Vikram's article, it looks perfect and has been passed without any objections. We should have copy-edited on our own! Really really not happy. Johannes003 (talk) 18:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * With respect, Johannes003, please read the Manual of Style. I'm sorry if I made grammatical and spelling errors; please point them out and I'll fix them. If my copy-editing style is "horrible", feel free to contact me at my talk page rather than complain about me my work behind my back on somebody else's talk page. Thanks, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 17:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * With respect, Baffle gab, I just expressed my displeasure to another editor, whose idea it was to "improve" the article and promote it to GA level. I adressed him because it was he who said some third person from the GOCE should copy-edit the article. I thought of writing on the talk page, but then I didn't want to hurt you. (I agree, though, that I was too harsh and should have avoided terms like "horrible". I didn't expect you to read this. I apologize!) I have read WP:MOS, I have seen numerous other good and featured articles. You have done your work, it may be correct or not, but I am just not happy with it. You may correct false sentences or remove redundant claims, but was it necessary to change whole clauses and sentence structures. And words like "stated", "claimed", "noted" are all not allowed? A word like "Box office success" or "eventually" is forbidden? Back in school, I learned we shall use a variety of words rather than overuse certain words. I don't want to pinpoint and question every minor edit of yours, after all we requested a copy-edit and you are doing all this voluntarily. I was just wondering, why it is wrong here, while it is allowed in other articles. Whatever, you continue your work, you seem to know what you're doing and as long as nobody (else) is complaining, it's all fine. I'm feeling discontent and have lost interest in this article. Johannes003 (talk) 22:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Johannes003, thank you for replying. I wasn't expecting to find your comments either, I stumbled across them by accident. I didn't take your comments personally, and I now wish I'd left it alone. Negative feedback is helpful because it helps me improve my editing, and I don't claim to be perfect.Regarding my edits, those terms (Box office success', 'eventually' etc) are not 'forbidden' at all, but if they're used redundantly I remove them. Articles can become cluttered with redundancies and metaphors that make them hard to understand, so I remove them.Likewise I remove references that don't actually reference the text.This can leave articles a little monotonous but I can only really edit what's in the article.India generally uses British English spellings, which might account for some of the spelling problems you've found - otherwise I'm sorry for my sloppiness! I accept your apology; thank you. :-) I hope you don't feel discouraged to continue editing this and other articles. Thank you again for replying and good wishes with the G.A. nomination. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:29, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Mail

 * Replied via email -- Commander (Ping Me) 18:03, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Replied.  Secret of success  Talk to me  07:40, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Rajinikanth health
Hi, I've made a few changes to Rajinikanth in light of your recent suggestions on the talk page. As you'll see I've included the 'Health' section under a new 'Biography' section, which includes all of his details, including career. I was wondering if I should include his political activities in their as well, but thought I'd get some suggestions from you first. Please check it out. Revert it back if you feel it isn't good or feel free to change it up. EelamStyleZ (talk) 19:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thank you Venky Rajeshbieee (talk) 08:46, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Billa needs a bath
Oh great king of Indian articles on Wikipedia, the world needs ur help. The article Billa (2007 film) is presently not in a good status, Eg: The "reviews" section contains inappropriate and informal language which must be re-checked, and the "prequel" section contains information that has not been updated for long. Please fix this issue, and thanks for reading. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:30, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Ok never mind, the article has been cleaned up. Sorry if I bothered you. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)


 * There is nothing for me to bother. I just said what I can do. -- Commander (Ping Me) 16:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Template!!!
Hi,,, i see that u have nominated the "Template:FilmfareTeluguBestActor 1980–1989", "1990–1999", "2000-2009", "2000-2009" to be merged with Template:FilmfareTeluguBestActor 1972–1979. merging them all becomes Template:FilmfareTeluguBestActor, which already exists. So, its better delete them rather than merging....wht do u say ??
 * Regards
 * DRAGON BOOSTER  ★  19:06, 16 November 2011 (UTC).
 * I didn't notice the main template. I presumed no such template exists as of now. The new user has also created a similar style of templates for Nandi Awards, which in turn is not necessary. -- Commander (Ping Me) 19:53, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

SP. Muthuraman
It had 2 articles before as " S.P.Muthuraman" and " S.P. Muthuraman". I redirected it as a new page as " SP. Muthuramam as the film title shows it as SP without any dots in between. It is the standard title for him. As far as Box-office status is concerned, we should update it as every one are interested in knowing the same. A film's box-office status is the utlimate. Rajeshbieee (talk) 11:18, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Venky, you can move it...Rajeshbieee (talk) 11:41, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Re:International Film Festivals
Hey Vensatry, I just saw your message. Apology for late reply. The only idea available is Google news search. Even I m too lazy. -- Karthik Nadar (talk) 15:14, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Verifiability
Hey, sorry to disturb you man. Can you state your opposition here because not many editors seem interested in resolving this issue.  Secret of success  Talk to me  12:42, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Opposition?? -- Commander (Ping Me) 15:32, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Opposition to the addition of the fake claim.  Secret of success  Talk to me  16:00, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * When you ask someone to participate in a discussion, don't just directly ask them to support for your point even if it's right. It looks more of like canvassing. In future make your notifications in a neutral manner. &mdash; Commander (Ping me) 16:55, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

List of most populous cities in India
I have again edited this page swapping the positions of Patna and Nagpur. This time I have put citations. Reference contains an official document released by census board of India which confirms population of Nagpur at 2,405,421 and that of Patna at 1,683,200. Hope this helps. Thank you. Pradyumna666 (talk) 15:38, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * My mistake! Apologies for that. I didn't check the previous edit made by the IP user. Happy Editing! -- Commander (Ping Me) 15:50, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 November 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:01, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Good article
Hi Vensatry, first of all, a bunch of congrats in making Karthi a Good article. I have added the article to the list as per your request in the talk page of the project. Keep up the good work:) -- Karthik Nadar (talk) 04:34, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Re. Karthi
Nice to hear this, well done! It was you who took the necessary steps to promote the article, so I have to thank you! Keep it on! Johannes003 (talk) 17:38, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank U!!!
Thank You for the Barnstar. &&&& ur appreciation of my contributions. I hope that I can continue to be a positive influence on the Wikipedia community in the future!!
 * Regards,
 * DRAGON BOOSTER  ★  19:09, 23 November 2011 (UTC).

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks a lot :) &mdash; Commander (Ping me) 14:25, 23 November 2011 (UTC)


 * No problems, please award a barnstar to a deserved editor today. --Sp33dyphil © • © 07:04, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Something wrong
In the Chennai article, it says that the city is the "second most densely populated after Delhi". Density of a city means the population per unit area. Mumbai has a larger population and a much smaller area compared to Delhi, how can Delhi be the most dense? It should be Mumbai, Delhi, then Chennai. And Kolkata has a population larger than that of Chennai. What are your thoughts about this?  Secret of success  Talk to me  13:04, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * If the area is unclear, then how can we say without doubt that Chennai is the second most densely populated city? No, Delhi has a larger area and a smaller population compared to Mumbai (we should follow only what is stated in the page!). I have changed it to "one of the most densely populated cities." Please put forward your objections, if you have any.  Secret of success  Talk to me  13:31, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, but unless we have the latest sources, we had better not put any emphasis on this in the article. Hope thats fine with you.  Secret of success  Talk to me  14:13, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I doubt if census covers the density of cities, but if it does, then we can add it only when it releases. Otherwise if you can find authentic sources published after 2010, its fine. Thats how it is :P  Secret of success  Talk to me  14:36, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Annavru 2003 film
Venky, I remember that, I created a page for Kannada film "Annavru" 2003 film starring darsshan and ambareesh. Someone deleted that page. Can you help me to trace it ? Rajeshbieee (talk) 11:58, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Chennai
The article has many problems, which have been listed in the talk page by User:SpacemanSpiff. The "Names" section has sources which don't verify the text. So, I thought of using an old version of the article, just after its second FA review for info on the etymology. Is it fine with you?  Secret of success  Talk to me  08:48, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:53, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Dheera (film)
Hi, Vensatry. I invite you to take part in this deletion discussion. Thanks! EelamStyleZ (talk) 01:34, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Illayaraja
Venky, It is not easy to check all the 900-1000 movies from a single page and check out important films, so the partial filmography is very important, moreover it has been sorted as languagewise. Please revert it back to the first page. Rajeshbieee (talk) 08:40, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Re: Donation message
Thanks alot friend :) -- Karthik Nadar (talk) 05:27, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Rajinikanth
The lead looks nice now. I made a minor capitalization correction, otherwise it looks good. However, I don't feel right about mentioning films that "elevated him" as it could lead to POV. We need clear cut sources for those kinds of things. Consider Vijay (actor), where some editors are keen on adding Kaavalan and Velayudham to the list of films that are mentioned in the lead on that page. Overtime, this list can accumulate and editors will be more prone to add their favourite films. Of course, that can be changed with reverts, but it's always good to avoid edit wars. That's my opinion on mentioning multiple films in lead sections. EelamStyleZ (talk) 17:13, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Rajinikanth Popularity section
I have added the info about Graffiti wall is set for Superstar's 61st birthday by popular Television channel. Kindly let me know the reason about this revert--Jenith Michael Raj ( talk ) 02:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Bairavi
Orlady (talk) 22:23, 4 December 2011 (UTC) 08:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Film November 2011 Newsletter
The  2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk &#124; contribs) 22:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Rajini
You guys do not make Wikipedia a place for your's own preferences and approach. I made it very clear and going with the already mentioned reasons and causes. There is a very thin line between a legitimate, correct statement and POV pushing. I cannot hold responsible for you if you keep on deciding all are POV's. How can you argue on me, I am doing POV here when all materials support are done with clear, concise reason as told before in the discussion page. Please do not use your powers, strategy to ignore it for own individual purpose. Also this fact is neutral and not highlighted for any reason other than to include it as one of the statements. Thats it. You guys revise it properly and act wise. Ungal Vettu Pillai (talk) 05:17, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

about citation
National Film Awards received in 1980 are for the films 1979 ?? The PDF citation talks about films released in 1980 in the National Film award for best Tamil film article You accuse me of rvv??? are you new to wikipedia??? (Intercell (talk) 13:47, 6 December 2011 (UTC))


 * The year given in the article corresponds to the actual year in which the film was released. Check with the source, it clearly mentions the claim. Removing sourced content is considered vandalism. Since you are a new user, I didn't warn you. And above all, I know whom you are! -- &mdash; Commander (Ping me) 14:11, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

I have checked with your source, it speaks about 28th national film awards of 1981 for films released in 1980 and not 1979, please dont get irritated. I am here to resolve things. (Intercell (talk) 14:15, 6 December 2011 (UTC)).


 * See this link It clearly mentions that, the Best film in Tamil for 1980 is Nenjathai Killadhey. They have combined two years' awards in a single document. &mdash; Commander (Ping me) 14:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Exactly, what you say is correct,I think you need to rearrange the order in the article. But can you please clarify with page number for the regional film awards received for the films released in 1979 and not 1980 (Intercell (talk) 14:27, 6 December 2011 (UTC)).


 * Then undo your edit. &mdash; Commander (Ping me) 14:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

ya sure I will self revert my edit. But here is a situation where in, there is no list of films released in 1979 in this link. (Intercell (talk) 14:33, 6 December 2011 (UTC)).

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 19:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

citation
I have added citation needed tag to your version at Best feature film in Tamil. Happy editing

(Intercell (talk) 13:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)).

Please check page 74 of my citation in special jury national award (Intercell (talk) 14:55, 6 December 2011 (UTC)).

Thank you for your suggestion. You please do your edits without imagining negatively about other editors. I am here to help articles not to harm articles. (Intercell (talk) 15:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC)).

I only corrected the intro section in nagarjuna akkineni artilcle, about the number of awards he received, which is not required, as the awards received is listed in awards section. (Intercell (talk) 15:08, 6 December 2011 (UTC)).
 * Not at all. You have completely reverted my edits thereby removing large chunks of information that I added. For heaven sake stop reverting. Provide the official source for his special jury award. Until then don't add it back to the article. &mdash; Commander (Ping me) 07:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the misunderstanding! The special awards were listed as "Special jury" and "Special Mention" in different pages, which I didn't notice. I have added it back to the article. &mdash; Commander (Ping me) 07:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

rajini lead.

 * Vensatry. For your kind attention I am watching this page and doing edits for a very long time from now. It is a clear fact that you along with one or two objecting it for your own reasons. And now you pointing me, copied the statements and sources from Awards section as you told here. ---"You have copied the same content from the "Awards" section and added the same reference (link to same URL) as a new one and messed up the ref formatting." Please don't act smart. It was first initially on the lead section right from the first time since I am watching this article and doing edits. It was you along with others objecting it trying to ignore it for your unknown reasons. Ok. Please don't mistake me when you fell short. Your reasons and argument clearly proves you want to ignore and omit it for all costs.


 * I explained you countless times before, unless lead section are not repetitive and facts meeting significant importance and proper support of materials available along with neutral view -- it is absolutely a proper, legitimate corrections or edit in wiki. Please again don't mistake me and allow yourself to revise it clean and understand it properly from all of my previous discussion to you on this very same issue. Ungal Vettu Pillai (talk) 05:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Twitter status message Template
This is a template to generate a direct link to the Twitter status message. You can use this template to navigate directly to the Tweet or to refer someone directly to any Tweet in your wiki. You can use this template freely wherever you need to refer any tweets/twitter users of Twitter for your external references or some other places. --Jenith Michael Raj ( talk ) 06:25, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Twitter_status

Nagarjuna
As far as I believe, I have not removed any reference cited by you. I have added a new reference which is a news letter published by eastern michigan university, (of course any thing can be blogged). This is the only best citation available about Indian actor nagarjuna being listed as an alumni of their university - EMU (Intercell (talk) 18:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)).

As far as his career spanning 25 years and producing films is concerned, it is no super achievement when compared to current indian actors like Mohan Lal etc. He did not achieve anything significant. Further, I have changed the wording of yours, but not the info.

(Intercell (talk) 19:03, 7 December 2011 (UTC)).

lead
You can expand lead (Intercell (talk) 19:48, 7 December 2011 (UTC)).

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx
Could you provide a bit more info please? Thanks Alexandria (chew out) 21:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Namely diffs, sorry about leaving that part out. Alexandria (chew out) 22:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Rajinikanth lead
Hi, sorry for the late reply about this. I think that's fine, but we should make sure it doesn't give undue weight to one or two particular films. I'd like to see you do that to the lead at Rajinikanth some time soon. I'll let you know how it looks. EelamStyleZ  leave one  23:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * By the way, I sort of played around with the subsections of the Biography section. Do take a look at it and let me know how it is. EelamStyleZ   leave one  23:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Hmm, if it isn't too great then feel free to change it back. I grouped certain sections so that they can create sections that are roughly the same size as others. If you take the previous section 'Sabattical after Baba it's a relatively small section when compared to the previous 'Resurgence and acclaim'. Same with the 'Early life' section and 'Early career' sections—they seemed like small sections in comparison to other sections when ungrouped. Perhaps if we could expand each section enough with reliable sources then splitting them up shouldn't be a problem. I'm not too much of a fan of the titles I gave the grouped sections either—see if you could come up with a more apt heading if you decide to keep the sections grouped. EelamStyleZ'   talk  15:40, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks! :) Would like to talk to you sometime.- Ravi My Tea Kadai 14:52, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

My edits are reverted
Nope, In fact I had put the link for Moonam Pakkam and that was conveniently removed without any justification. I will restore it as Moonam Pakkam was not in her filmography and I had added it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Licint (talk • contribs)

Indeed, you won't see the links. Contribution by other memmbers are indeed unencyclopedic to you. Anyway, check my earlier version and search for Moonam...you will see the name and link of this movie "Moonam Pakkam (1988) .... Pachu's mom" This is now conveniently reverted coz you and you friends don't appreciate the contribution of other members. I will be putting this link coz everybody has the right to contribute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Licint (talk • contribs)
 * First of all do sign the talk pages by typing four tildes. Now coming to your edits, I didn't say that the movie that you added was not right. You added a sentence which was a Point of View and doing edits like that breaches the formal tone of Wikipedia. &mdash; Commander (Ping me) 18:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

You just tagged someone's edit as "nonsense" How wikipedic is that. All I can say is, there are plenty of wiki bullies around, but they won't deter someone from contributing to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Licint (talk • contribs)


 * First of all assume good faith. I didn't mean to hurt you. Inspite of multiple warnings by me and another user, you constantly kept adding those sentences which made me a bit upset. &mdash; Commander (Ping me) 05:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)


 * OK. I understand. I am undoing my edit now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Licint (talk • contribs)

Re: Hemamalini
That's exactly the reason why :-). The article says that Hemamalini is from Ammangudi in Tiruchi dt. But the Wikipedia article on Ammankudi claims that the place is in Thanjavur district. So since we are not sure whether she is from Tiruchi, I thought of removing the category.- Ravi My Tea Kadai 05:29, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Opinion
Hello. Could you spare a couple of minutes to decide your views in these two discussions? WP:FILM and Deletion nomination.  X.One   SOS  14:22, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Assessment
Please reassess this article. Thanks!  X.One   SOS  17:17, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ &mdash; Commander (Ping me) 17:19, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

A user has commented on your post.  X.One   SOS  11:33, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Rajinikanth image
I agree, there should be free images of Rajinikanth in the article. However, finding them are hard. I shall try searching for any free images on the web sometime this week and upload them to WP. EelamStyleZ  talk  16:58, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, that should be good too. Not too much though. I've uploaded a couple Enthiran screenshots and Chitti (character) page has some too. Other Rajini film screenshots may also be found in Wikimedia Commons. If you're gonna take screenshots of films yourself do make sure its from a 'clear' and original DVD. EelamStyleZ   talk  17:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 18:57, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Enthiran
Is it relevant to mention that Enthiran was considered as India's submission for oscar in the article? Source. Just like in Krrish, it says that it was "considered" for submission, so it seems notable enough for a note in the article. What do you think?  X.One   SOS  10:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, but where do you add it? In the "awards" section, you cannot say that it was nominated, nor can you say "it was nominated to be nominated" (that would be really odd). Maybe we can add it in the "Release" or "critical reception" section. Though I can't say anything more. I doubt if the article can be considered for GA without highlighting that award.  X.One   SOS  11:42, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Aha, that's were the problem spurts. We use a table for the awards and the last column must have either a "Won" or "nominated" template, otherwise the uniformity would be thrown to the winds. Perhaps a better solution would be to put "nominated" and say that it was done for "Indian selection for Academy award for Foreign language" because it was nominated to be nominated and not nominated to win the award. :D It looks a bit confusing, but no so if it is mentioned in the article. What do you say?  X.One   SOS  11:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * And how exactly do we create one when there is no need to do so as all awards are mentioned with enough detail and in a concise manner? It would be against Wp:PLOT. Now, the only way to do it is as I have suggested above.  X.One   SOS  12:38, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I proposed a separate article for Critical Response, but User:Fae had gone against it. I doubt if he would agree to this one.  X.One   SOS  12:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Whatever, that doesn't matter to me. Speaking about socks, do you think this user is another sock of Padmal?  X.One   SOS  13:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC)