User talk:Veracious/Archive 1

Thank you very much
The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,  &mdash; The Transhumanist   11:14, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please ping me. Thank you. -TT

June 2018
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Trisno, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:36, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah.. sorry, i forgot to fill the summary section. I want to move Trisno to Trisno Ishak because there are more than one people having that as their first name or even as their nickname. I tried to move it using the "move tool" (at the top bar, as usual), but it says i don't have the right to do so. So, i moved it manually. Can you move the page instead? Thanks. flixwito ^(•‿•)^ (talk) 09:04, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Trisno, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Uh... sir, it's already in here. flixwito ^(•‿•)^ (talk) 09:37, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Did you check per above? You deleted about 18k of text. Please don't usurp an article and make a disambiguation page out of it. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:42, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I did, this page should be the disambiguation page. Thanks. flixwito ^(•‿•)^ (talk) 09:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think so. It's been an article on a person since it was created in 2008. Jim1138 (talk) 09:53, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I see, i will make a new disambiguation page, making this page as a redirect to here. Will that work? flixwito ^(•‿•)^ (talk) 09:58, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * No, Trisno should stay the way it is. Do not do a "cut/paste move" as it removed the wp:edit history which is required per CC BY-SA 3.0 License. Use Trisno (name) as the disambiguation page. You can add a or something similar to the top of Trisno Jim1138 (talk) 10:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Finally, the answer that i need, thank you for your patronage, sir. flixwito ^(•‿•)^ (talk) 10:38, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * My apologies for the confusion! Thank you for your contributions! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:24, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Usually a name is followed by a brief description. Example: Alfonzo. I don't see many redlinked names unless a link is in the description such as a band member with the band linked. See WP:LISTPEOPLE Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * , thanks for the help. flixwito ^(•‿•)^ (talk) 09:08, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lee Dong-hyuk


The article Lee Dong-hyuk has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro (talk) 18:48, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fifth personality


The article Fifth personality has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Term not mentioned on either link."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Suzuki Karimun
Hi Veracious, can you explain why you added a disambiguation template to Suzuki Karimun? As an article it describes and distinguishes between the different models quite well. As a DAB page MOS:DAB guidelines say that it should be a simple list without references or images. I don't have strong feelings either way, but I don't think that changing it to a DAB page will be an improvement (pinging who removed the previous DAB template). Leschnei (talk) 13:42, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I changed dab to dab-cleanup because (as you say) the page violates the MOS:DAB rules on pictures and references. Even as I did so, I felt that the page might better be classified as a WP:SIA; but thought that someone else should have a look. Narky Blert (talk) 14:20, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the late reply, this already looks good for me. Also i'm sorry for violating the MoS. flixwito ^(•‿•)^ 05:38, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply Veracious. I just didn't want to start an edit war when a little conversation could prevent it! Leschnei (talk) 11:14, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote
Dear Veracious,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Announcing WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Dear Wikipedians and contributors, the open source Wikipedia review tool, previously "WikiLoop Battlefield" has completed its name vote and is announcing its new name: WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Read the full story on the program page on Meta-wiki, learn about ways to support this tool, and find out what future developments are coming for this tool.

Thank you to everyone who took part in the vote!

xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 18:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Hi , you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page. Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly! María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC) If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
HI , I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users. Thanks and see you around online, María Cruz MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC) If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review
Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Robin S: user talk page on Cebuano Wikipedia
Hi there,

I've just seen that you left a welcome message on my user talk page for the Cebuano Wikipedia. While I don't mean to appear ungrateful, I'm a little confused since I don't speak Cebuano and have not been involved with the Cebuano Wikipedia (as far as I know)! Has there been some sort of mistake, or were you just in a very welcoming mood? :P Robin S (talk) 10:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello. Well, it's.. more like a little shoutout. Cebuano Wikipedia is "littered" by bot-created articles. I want people to try tidy the wiki up, at least for geographic article (because that's the easiest one, you can just go for article about where you live). As a Wikipedian, i think we should try to contribute to other language wiki other than our "home" wiki. No rushing though, it's just an optional quest. Regards. flixwito ^(•‿•)^ 08:28, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. Thanks for clarifying! I'm a little wary of making potentially "bold" edits when there's something I'm unfamiliar with (especially the language it's written in!) but I'll keep the possibility in mind. All the best. Robin S (talk) 16:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Pencabutan pemblokiran saya
Tolong cabut pemblokiran saya karena ip dia dengan aku beda aku 110 dia 180.dan saya tidak bisa menganti nama tapi aku buat akun baru saya tidak tahu kalau itu tidak boleh BD Vinsa malica ashviya (talk) 04:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Kalau urusan IP, silahkan bicara ke adminnya, disini saya hanya seorang pengguna biasa. Trims. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 04:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Pakuwon Mall
Hello, I have reverted your edit since you removed a large portion of the page without explaining why, while adding external links. The editsummary was just a WP:Redlink, if this was a mistake feel free to undo my revert. Thanks, Terasail [✉️] 02:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reminder. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 02:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Now At Our School
It seems like you have created an article with a wrong title. Obviously, all sources listed to that article mentions Now At Our School—not—All of Us Are Dead. I maybe wrong, could you please explain why? — Princess Faye ( my talk ) 08:08, 6 April 2022 (UTC)


 * That's what make me confused, why they (those sources) got the wrong name. If you are still unsure the original webtoon name, just check the last link at All_of_Us_Are_Dead (the official english webtoon link). I maybe wrong too. Thanks. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 14:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)


 * It is still not right to rely on just one source, and on that one source you based the name of the article? Instead of checking other links? — Princess Faye ( my talk ) 14:57, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Have you already check another source on the article, especially from the Korean website? Obviously, all sources' title listed in the article are raw translation from the korean title instead of the official english title. Hence, the article editor/creator uses "Now Our School" instead of "All of Us Are Dead" (i guess they're not a webtoon reader either).
 * This is why i don't like reference's title literal translation, because it's misleading and creates ouroboros effect. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 02:23, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm still waiting for your comment, if you don't have any objection in one week, i will undo you revert. Thanks. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 04:03, 9 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Ofcourse, I object. Sources mentioned 'Now at our school' not 'All of us are dead', that would be a false information if you continue to change it. — Princess Faye ( my talk ) 05:03, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I see you keep he source from Korea will call it "Now at our school" because that's the title published in there. This is English-language Wikipedia, please use the official English title. That would be a false information if you keep neglecting the primary source. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 03:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, the title of the article isn't possibly wrong. But I think you should not change those 'Now At Our School' mentioned in the All of us are dead article. — Princess Faye ( my talk ) 11:07, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Hmm, i think we need a third opinion. Would you mind if i continue this discussion at another namespace? Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 02:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)