User talk:VeraciousEagle

Welcome VeraciousEagle! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 42,800,195 registered editors!

Hello VeraciousEagle. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm RobertEves92, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page and someone will try to help. To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own personal sandbox] for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your userpage.

Please remember to: The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes  at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
 * Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

 Sincerely, Robert Eves 92  13:51, 31 December 2021 (UTC)    [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RobertEves92&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kathryn Krick (April 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kathryn Krick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kathryn Krick, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kathryn_Krick Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gene93k&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kathryn_Krick reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 21:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your swift review. What is best way to proceed? Removing all of the Youtube references, and the related facts? A substantial part of the facts is also being supported by the newspaper article in Trouw. Trouw is a high quality national Dutch newspaper and a very reliable source. They have written a full article about her. It is behind a paywall, but you can read it here: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:G2-w42rKiNAJ:https://www.trouw.nl/religie-filosofie/spartelen-gillen-en-huilen-bij-de-uitdrijving-van-demonen-met-predikster-kathryn-krick~be7cd0f4/+&cd=1&hl=nl&ct=clnk&gl=nl VeraciousEagle (talk) 22:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * While Trouw is a good independent reference, it appears to be the only one in the draft. General notability requires non-trivial coverage from multiple (more than one) reliable sources independent of the subject. One concern about YouTube and IMDb, is puffing up the subject with non-significant facts.  Criticism should not use user-generated sites like YouTube, even for attribution.  If they have any due weight, reliable sources should note that. The Trouw article is acceptable, where relevant. • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kathryn Krick
Hello, VeraciousEagle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kathryn Krick, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kathryn Krick


Hello, VeraciousEagle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kathryn Krick".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)