User talk:Veranot

May 2022
Hello, Veranot. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Pap-Ion Magnetic Inductor, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bakkster Man (talk) 14:15, 3 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Dear Bakkster Man,
 * I do not have an affiliation with this company I do not even own their product. I simply did my research (as you can see by my citations). The current description is outdated and biased and I cannot imagine that this was written by an objective party.  Veranot (talk) 14:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for responding and clearing that up. As a new editor, please note that we have specific sourcing guidelines which your edit didn't appear to adhere to. While I'd recommend reading all the policies and guidelines, some specific ones to make note of are WP:NOR (WP:PRIMARY in particular), and our more stringent requirements on biomedical information in WP:MEDRS. Thanks, again, and welcome. Bakkster Man (talk) 14:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Dear Bakkster Man,
 * I am sorry but I do not understand why my last edit was removed again. Each and every sentence has been given a correct citation form a reliable source such as medical journals. How can a medical journal or a study perfomed by the Medical University of Vienna possibly not be good enough?? And then if I compare this to the current version, which is filled with dubious links and statements I am simply atounded by the way it seems wikipedia sets its standards. Veranot (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Because we favor WP:SECONDARY studies in general, and require them on medical claims to ensure replication. You may have better luck opening a discussion on the article's talk page. Bakkster Man (talk) 11:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)