User talk:Verbarson

Your submission at Articles for creation: GWR 4600 Class has been accepted
 GWR 4600 Class, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=GWR_4600_Class help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 11:55, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Verbarson! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:59, Sunday, February 28, 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skerne Bridge has been accepted
 Skerne Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Skerne_Bridge help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:08, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Being Brunel
Hello, Verbarson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Being Brunel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Skerne bridge photo
I'd like to do a painting of this photo. Please can you tell me your name so I can reference you properly. If that's ok?

Thank you Michelle


 * Michelle, I am delighted and flattered. I assume you mean the main picture from the Skerne Bridge article? As a photograph, there is rather too much foreground clutter for it to be satisfactory, but a painter might be able to omit some distracting elements. There is a closer picture toward the end of the article that may clarify some hidden details.
 * May I ask what the picture is for? I appreciate that the 200th anniversary of the bridge's opening is coming, and there will be a demand for pictures of all aspects of the S&DR, and I thoroughly approve of interest in our railway history. If you let me know how the picture may be used, I can decide how my name may be linked to it.
 * In any case, you are free to use the picture under the terms of Wikipedia's licence (see here for full details) without any further permission from me.
 * --Verbarson (talk) 23:17, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Testing the WikiDonation template
This is to allow me to test the use of the Reply function using the WikiDonation template (or vice versa).--Verbarson (talk) 22:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Welcome and thank you for your question about donations! To hide the fundraising banners, you can create an account, go into your preferences, navigate to the Banners tab, and uncheck Fundraising. Wikimedia Foundation does not track the identity of IP addresses, so it doesn't know your age, income level or whether you donated in the past. Not one of the volunteer editors here who add content to articles receives any financial benefit. We simply contribute our time because we care about building a great encyclopedia for you and innumerable others around the world to use. Thank you again, Verbarson (talk) 22:25, 12 December 2021 (UTC) Verbarson (talk) 22:25, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Welcome and thank you for your question about donations! To hide the fundraising banners, you can create an account and uncheck . The Wikimedia Foundation does not track the identity of IP addresses, so it doesn't know your age, income level or whether you donated in the past. None of the Wikipedia volunteer editors here who add and improve content in articles receive any financial benefit. We all simply contribute our time because we care about building a great encyclopedia for you and innumerable others around the world to use. If you cannot afford it, no one wants you to donate. Wikipedia is not at risk of shutting down, and the Wikimedia Foundation, which hosts the Wikipedia platform and is asking for these donations, is richer than ever. We are led to believe that users who allow cookies are less likely to see these banners on repeat visits (further information is available here), and you are welcome to communicate directly with the donor-relations team by emailing  .  Thank you! --Verbarson talkedits 13:41, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your help desk question
Did you ever get an answer to this question, which I just saw? If not, WP:VPT might be the place to ask.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  00:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)


 * , no, I never got an answer. As far as the original issue was concerned, WP:SECTIONHEAD states that headings should not redundantly refer back to the subject of the article, so I could just remove the initials (though I have not done that). It appears that GeoGroup is not well supported; other queries on Template talk:GeoGroup are unresolved. --Verbarson talkedits 13:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Bypassing redirects
Please don't make edits, per WP:NOTBROKEN. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)


 * @Redrose64 Ah, apologies. I have now read the help page. I was rather influenced by the text that came up when I moved the page, which (as I remember - I don't know how to re-create it without another move) suggested tidying up any redirects. Perhaps I should have read it more carefully.-- Verbarson talkedits 22:42, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You will have seen this message:
 * [ Check what links here] to see whether the move has created any double redirects, and fix the most serious ones. A bot will fix the rest later on. You can use the following text to replace older redirects:
 * So it asks you to fix up double redirects - that is, a redirect that now links to another redirect. You were not doing that - you were bypassing single redirects. The first link provides a list of double redirects, these are the only pages that need fixing. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 23:09, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * @Redrose64 Thank you -- Verbarson talkedits 08:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * As an example, is a fix of a double redirect. Before that edit, we had:
 * Tramlink Route 1 → Tramlink route 1 → Tramlink
 * and afterwards we have
 * Tramlink Route 1 → Tramlink
 * Tramlink route 1 → Tramlink
 * Usually it's easiest to let bots sort them out. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:34, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I get it. Thanks. -- Verbarson talkedits 13:25, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I get it. Thanks. -- Verbarson talkedits 13:25, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:GWR oil burning steam locomotives
Hello, Verbarson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:GWR oil burning steam locomotives, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:GWR oil burning steam locomotives


Hello, Verbarson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "GWR oil burning steam locomotives".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:07, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

GWR 3400 Class
Hi, I see that you have created. The problem is that there was no such thing. Altogether, the GWR and BR (Western Region) had three locomotives numbered 3400, and none of them was either the initial locomotive of a class, nor the first of a batch, these being the usual criteria for selection of a class number.

The first was no. 3400 Durban of the Atbara class, being the eighth locomotive of Swindon Lot 126 - the entire Lot was numbered 3393-3412, total 20 built 1901. Ten of these, nos. 3400-9, were rebuilt to the City class between 1902 and 1909, no. 3400 being dealt with during 1907. At the 1912 renumbering, no. 3400 became no. 3700.

The second was no. 3462 Winnipeg of the Bulldog (or Camel) class, being the tenth locomotive of Swindon Lot 148 - the entire Lot was nos. 3453-72, total 20 built 1904. At the 1912 renumbering, no. 3462 became no. 3400. This locomotive was withdrawn in 1949.

The third was no. 3400 of the 9400 (or 94xx) class, being the eleventh locomotive of Lot 387 - nos. 9490-9 and 3400-9, total 20 built 1954-56.

Hope this helps. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 19:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I see your point. Would it be better to make it a disambiguation page? I should have realised myself that five different classes (Atbara, City, Churchward County, Bird and 9400 PTs) had a place in the 34xx sequence. -- Verbarson talkedits 20:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * forgot to notify you in my reply. Sorry. -- Verbarson talkedits 20:19, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I have changed the page to a Dab page. -- Verbarson talkedits 21:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 08:23, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Railway arches
Quite by chance I read a couple of things about the use of railway arches in London today, in a recent edition of The London Drinker (which is an official CAMRA publication with full editorial oversight and, to my mind, counts as a reliable source). This is a note to remind me to re-read these pieces and add them to the draft, which is on my watchlist. They weren't very substantial, but everything helps! I believe all past editions of The London Drinker are viewable on a website somewhere; if they are also searchable, that might help even more...! Cheers, Hassocks 5489 (Floreat Hova!) 00:35, 29 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes, it looks as if railway arches are a major landlord for small breweries. I've added a link to the page. Thanks. -- Verbarson talkedits 10:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Railway arches in London
Hello, Verbarson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Railway arches in London, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)