User talk:Verde Ojo's

Welcome!
Hello, Verde Ojo&#39;s, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  09:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Raza Unida


A tag has been placed on Draft:Raza Unida requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://latinoprisongangs.blogspot.com/2009/09/raza-unida.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanCherek (talk) 13:57, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Verde Ojo's/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Verde Ojo's/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://latinoprisongangs.blogspot.com/2009/09/raza-unida.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanCherek (talk) 13:58, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Border Brothers


A tag has been placed on Border Brothers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. WhoAteMyButter ( 📨talk │ 📝contribs ) 05:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, @Verde Ojo's. I have retagged this page for speedy deletion.  Please do not recreate it again without providing reliable sources showing the notability of the Border Brothers.  Thank you! ~  Matthewrb  Talk to me &middot;  Changes I've made 04:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * {{reply to|Verde Ojo's|NawlinWiki|Deb}Matthewrb}} This article has been created a number of times: in 2009, in 2012, and by you on both August 1, 2022 and August 8, 2022. I suggested a possible reference, for its August 1, 2022 creation but this was, and in my opinion correctly, rejected. The August 8, 2022 version of the article you created would again appear to meet the WP:A7 criteria for speedy deletion. I have prevented its recreation in "articlepsace". I can see you have created a an article "draft", and thank you for that. Please bear in mind that this draft may quite possibly declined or rejected for most of the same reasons that the Border Brothers article was deleted. Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions about this. Peter in Australia aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:39, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I noticed that in this edit to Sonora Cartel, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lavender &#124;(formerly HMSSolent )&#124; lambast 04:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nuevo Cartel de Sinaloa Soldados


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Nuevo Cartel de Sinaloa Soldados, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 15:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, @Verde Ojo's. I have tagged this page for deletion again.  Please do not create articles like this without adding reliable sources showing why this group is notable. ~  Matthewrb  Talk to me &middot;  Changes I've made 04:04, 12 August 2022 (UTC)


 * From my investigation it seems probable that the article was a hoax. However, I have given you a chance to prove that it wasn't by moving it to draftspace rather than deleting it, so that you can add citations to reliable sources. Please do so as soon as possible, which must be quite soon, as you must have obtained the information from somewhere, if you didn't make it up yourself, and you must be able to say where that somewhere was. If any other editing you have done can't be cited to verifiable reliable sources then please revert  that editing, to save other editors from having to search through your editing history to find what corrections are needed.JBW (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Misleading edit summaries
A very large proportion of your edits have edit summaries which totally misrepresent what those edits do, such as "Fixed typo" for edits which do absolutely nothing of the sort, and which in many cases make substantial changes to article content. Please make sure that your edit summaries accurately reflect what your edits do. JBW (talk) 08:41, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sonora Cartel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Linea. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Block
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for continuing to make edits with misleading edit summaries, such as "Fixed typo" for edits which do nothing of the sort, and "Added content" for edits which in fact remove content. I also draw your attention to messages above, warning you of other problems, such as removing article content without explanation, and adding content without providing citations to sources. When the block is over please don't continue in the same way. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. JBW (talk) 15:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

 Since the block on your account ended, every edit you have made has done one or more of the following: providing an edit summary which misrepresents what you have done, removing article content without explanation, or adding content without providing citations to sources. In view of the clear warnings you have been given, including my message to you immediately above, and in view of your total failure to ever make any sign of taking notice of messages, I seriously considered blocking you from editing indefinitely. I have, however, decided to block you on this occasion for two weeks, in the hope that you will at last take notice and change your ways. If you don't change your ways after this block, it is very likely that you will be blocked indefinitely. If you have changed your mind and would like to start contributing to the encyclopaedia in accordance with Wikipedia policies and guidelines after all, and if you think there are good reasons why unblocking you will benefit the project, you may request an unblock by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JBW (talk) 20:51, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

 Here are some of the edits you have made since the last block ended:
 * This edit had an edit summary which misrepresented what the edit did.
 * This edit added content not supported by the cited source; nor have I been able to find any source supporting it.
 * This edit likewise added unsourced information.
 * This edit was even worse, as it not only added unsourced information, but added it as a note to a reference rather than in the text of the article, strongly implying that it was a clarification of the reference, despite the fact that the source cited in that reference does not say anything of the sort.

In fact, since that block ended, every edit you have made has provided an edit summary which misrepresents what you have done or added content without providing citations to sources. In view of what the block notice above says, you will therefore not be at all surprised to learn that you have now been indefinitely blocked from editing. You have also still never responded to any message from any other editor.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of this page:, replacing the words "Your reason here" with a suitable message. JBW (talk)

Concern regarding Draft:Border Brothers
Hello, Verde Ojo&#39;s. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Border Brothers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Border Brothers


Hello, Verde Ojo&#39;s. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Border Brothers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)