User talk:Veritasnineteen

Daphne Iris Willis
Every single one of the references you put into the Daphne Iris Willis article is bogus. If you can provide reliable sources that there really is such a person or such a story, then please provide them. verifiability is a core policy of Wikipedia, and if this person can't be proven to have existed, then the article will have to go. Corvus cornix talk  00:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not create hoaxes. Please do not attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with varying results. Most hoaxes are marked for deletion within a few hours after they are created. Some Wikipedians suspect that the majority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. The page you got this image from, http://www.janetmcnaughton.ca/TDfashion.html, indicates that the person in the picture is Clementina Wallack. Corvus cornix talk  00:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Daphne Iris Willis
An editor has nominated Daphne Iris Willis, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Daphne Iris Willis
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Daphne Iris Willis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)