User talk:Verne Equinox/Archive4

2009

The ţinuturi
Hi. Thanks for the edits on the ţinuturi articles. Could I persuade to replace Axis powers with Hungary and a link to the Second Vienna Award, for those in Northern Transylvania? (The latter link could also be squeezed in somehow.) It's more accurate geographically and politically - technically, Romania was by then closer to the Axis than to the Allies. Also, Ţinutul Mării was actually part of an earlier a separate agreement with Bulgaria, with no Axis participation and at a time when Bulgaria and Romania were both in the same relationship with the Axis. It is the south (Southern Dobruja) that was lost then. I also think a rephrasing is in order for all the articles: if I got it right, *all* ţinuturi ceased to exist the Vienna thing, because the regime who supported them crumbled, leaving room for the more openly fascist and more revolutionary Iron Guard (the National Legionary State). They made sure to cast out all institutions of the earlier regime, but, granted, it took them a while. So it's not just the ones totally or partially lost that ceased to exist. Perhaps "was lost/was ceded" and "part of it was lost/was ceded"? Dahn (talk) 01:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I must rethink my comment (I hadn't noticed you were doing it for all of them, not just for the ones lost totally or partially. But in any case, perhaps something more precise, linking to the other existing articles, is what's needed. No pressure though, it's fine for now - except for the ones in Bessarabia, which were lost earlier (Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina). Dahn (talk) 01:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hm, yes. Repetitive tasks are not my cup of tea, and this would also require some fine tuning. But I'll see what I can do about it in the future. Cheers, Dahn

James Pearson Newcomb
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Rosiestep (talk) 01:44, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for James Pearson Newcomb
--Dravecky (talk) 07:55, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

File:AberdeenHospital Distance.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:AberdeenHospital Distance.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 02:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

File:NSHighway104 OutsideNewGlasgowWest.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:NSHighway104 OutsideNewGlasgowWest.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 02:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

File:NewGlasgow EastRiverBridge.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:NewGlasgow EastRiverBridge.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 02:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:NataliaOreiro TuVenenoAlbum.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:NataliaOreiro TuVenenoAlbum.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:SaintJohnMarketExterior.jpg
File:SaintJohnMarketExterior.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:SaintJohnMarketExterior.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * File:SaintJohnMarketInterior.jpg is now available as Commons:File:SaintJohnMarketInterior.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Orlando Letelier
This is one of those Criticism sections that can just get over bloated if not watched. But I'm pretty borderline on Letelier so if you think he should be in there, I'm fine with that.radek (talk) 17:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Old copyvio
While looking over Theodore Durrant I noticed a paragraph that was copied almost word for word from the source cited. I dug through the history and found this edit by you that added the copyright violation text. This was from a couple of years back. I hope in the years since then you've learned that copying text from other websites is forbidden, and that citing a website is for crediting information which you still have to put into your own words, not an excuse to copy the actual text. DreamGuy (talk) 18:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)


 * If you look at this you will see what transpired. I moved material from one article to another without looking to see whether it was legitimate. Thanks for watchdogging. It is important, I think. Verne Equinox (talk) 18:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh, OK, I can see where the error came in. Then I should probably track down the person who added the copyvio there that you unknowingly moved to the other article.
 * Sorry for assuming you made the copyright violation, but I don't know that there'd have been a way for me to see otherwise. In an ideal Wikipedia set up text moves would still be tagged to their original authors somehow, but I guess we're lucky the site can keep track of as much as it can as it is. DreamGuy (talk) 18:50, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons
Hello, I've seen that you have added the tag 'commonscat' to the page Vanessa Amorosi. So I thought you can help me to add this pictures to the Wikimedia Commons. I'm not the creator of those pitures.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nessapic2.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Np1.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tfg.jpg

How to add those pics to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Vanessa_Amorosi on Wikimedia Commons? Some help would be appreciated. Thanks! 217.237.151.206 (talk) 12:44, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I have posted them to Commons. Thanks for the links. Verne Equinox (talk) 00:47, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help! Much appreciated! 217.237.149.206 (talk) 18:09, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: John Thompson
Hello,

I did leave a reference for the additional material. It was "A Digital History of Canadian Poetry" but, apparently, the site has changed since my 2006 posting. For some unexplained reason the material was deleted by "jbsimmons" in April of this year. The User name is in red so there's no way to cantact them. I'll see if I can relocate the missing material and get back to you. -- Michael David (talk) 12:47, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

I found it:

http://www.youngpoets.ca/im_a_stranger_here_myself

It is the same site that I posted, but deeper in to it. You are welcome to restore the material to his Article since you found its deletion. Nice work. -- Michael David (talk) 13:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)


 * You're right, it should be much easier to search on that site. I think I'll tinker with it when I get more time and see what I can get it to do. In any case, you did an nice job returning the material to the article and expanding on the reference citation. I hope we get the opportunity to collaborate again sometime -- Michael David (talk) 19:42, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Je me souviens
Hello Verne Equinox,

You have commented out a paragraph in the article (All around the Parliament building, are 24 statues of historical figures. ...) asking if it was relevant.

Yes, this is very relevant: this is concretely what Eugène-Étienne Taché wanted Quebecers to remember: both their legacy (the great men) and their future (the blank spots). The first inspiring the second of course. Maybe the idea needs to be introduced by a sentence? -- Mathieugp (talk) 02:38, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The relevance was not clear as I read it. You could try again. Perhaps shorten your paragraph: the list of personages might be better in the article on the Parliament building. BTW, have you seen the Dictionary of Canadian Biography article on Taché? (DCB). I can't tell whether it contradicts or supports your material regarding the origins of "the second part".  Verne Equinox (talk) 22:44, 16 October 2009 (UTC)


 * For some reason, I cannot access the Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online at the moment. They must have a problem with their server. But I am sure there is nothing in his bio article on the second part of the motto as it was probably published before 1978.
 * I have restored the paragraph, but placed right after the paragraph where I mention his letter to Siméon Lesage. When I expanded the article in English Wikipedia in August 2008, I was relying mostly on Gaston Deschênes's article published in French in L'Encyclopédie de l'Agora in 2001. Since then, in 2009, he signed an English article on the same subject in History Wire. This new article appears to be a condensed, straight-to-the-point version of that written in French in 2001. Maybe it would be best to cite this one where it is relevant? -- Mathieugp (talk) 12:50, 17 October 2009 (UTC)


 * It certainly wouldn't hurt to cite Deschênes' 2001 article. The DCB article was written by Lucie K. Morisset and Luc Noppen who refer the reader to Deschênes' L’Hôtel du Parlement, témoin de notre histoire (1986). Their statement I'm confused by is this: "For the front wing of the legislative building, a new national emblem was officially approved on 9 Feb. 1883. It consisted of the province’s coat of arms emblazoned with an eloquent motto Taché had devised: Je me souviens. To this motto, Ernest Gagnon wished to add another that the architect had coined: “Born among the lilies, I grew up among the roses.” Verne Equinox (talk) 12:16, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It's my turn to be confused... ;-) The article (as it stands) cites almost only Deschênes' 2001 article. But it's all in French, so I was suggesting to cite his own 2006 English abridged version when it is possible. But maybe you meant "to cite Deschênes' 2009 article"?


 * The sentence in the DBC article is confusing indeed. I am not sure what role Gagnon played in the plans for the use of the second motto. But it is clear that the other motto 1) existed (Née dans les lis, je grandis dans les roses/Born in the lilies, I grow in the roses) and 2) was meant for a monument that in the end was not built. The monument was to be an allegory of the Canadian nation, a statue of a young gracious adolescent girl. Deschênes quotes two sources to support this, Ernest Gagnon himself and David Ross McCord. -- Mathieugp (talk) 18:50, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * You're right, I should have said 2009. Verne Equinox (talk) 19:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:BabeRuth.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BabeRuth.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 22:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Maria Dunn (musician)
Hello! Your submission of Maria Dunn (musician) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Geraldk (talk) 21:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:ZelaznyCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ZelaznyCover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Chatwincover.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Chatwincover.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Chatwincover.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Chatwincover.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Memphisto (talk) 11:32, 29 December 2009 (UTC)