User talk:VersaceSpace/Archive 2

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, 🇧🇼 The Rambling Man and Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are Gog the Mild, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski,  BennyOnTheLoose, 🇷🇼 Amakuru and  Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, this is your adoptee, StarshipSLS. Are you still active? StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 01:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

honestly not really. but it's more due to lack of motivation than anything else. if you have a question i can probably still answer it. versacespace leave a message!  07:10, 3 September 2021 (UTC)  versacespace  leave a message!  07:10, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

I have been away from Wikipedia for a while, so I want to know if anything interesting has happened while I was gone. StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 22:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page archiving
Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 09:17, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you. versacespace  leave a message!  15:49, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dumisani Dlamini


Hello, VersaceSpace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dumisani Dlamini".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Juicy (Doja Cat song)
The article Juicy (Doja Cat song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Juicy (Doja Cat song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Benmite -- Benmite (talk) 04:21, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Streets (Doja Cat song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Streets (Doja Cat song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. BuySomeApples (talk) 18:56, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Saucy Santana
Hello, VersaceSpace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saucy Santana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dick (song)
Hello, VersaceSpace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dick (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Stained Glass (song)


Hello, VersaceSpace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stained Glass".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:51, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Asthma Pump (song)
Hello, VersaceSpace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Asthma Pump (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Straightenin
Hello, VersaceSpace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Straightenin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hot Hot
Hello, VersaceSpace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hot Hot, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lauren Orlando
Hello, VersaceSpace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lauren Orlando, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dick (song)


Hello, VersaceSpace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dick".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bottom Bitch
Hello, VersaceSpace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bottom Bitch, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 November newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is, who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:


 * 1) with 5072 points
 * 2) with 3276 points
 * 3) with 3197 points
 * 4) with 1611 points
 * 5) with 1571 points
 * 6) with 1420 points
 * 7) with 1043 points
 * 8) with 528 points

All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.


 * wins the featured article prize, for 8 FAs in round 5.
 * wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 5.
 * wins the featured topic prize, for 13 articles in a featured topic in round 5.
 * wins the good article prize, for 63 GAs in round 4.
 * wins the good topic prize, for 86 articles in good topics in round 5.
 * wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5.
 * wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall.
 * wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Asthma Pump (song)


Hello, VersaceSpace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Asthma Pump".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Straightenin


Hello, VersaceSpace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Straightenin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cuban Doll


Hello, VersaceSpace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cuban Doll".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lauren Orlando


Hello, VersaceSpace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lauren Orlando".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The House Is Burning (album)
Hello, VersaceSpace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The House Is Burning (album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Streets (Doja Cat song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Streets (Doja Cat song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Realmaxxver -- Realmaxxver (talk) 04:01, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: and. Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: and. Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Rajamani
Can you check this page and review again? Draft:Rajamani. He is a well known music director in Malayalam and received state awards from Govt of Kerala. Here is Malayalam Wiki page ml:രാജാമണി. Almost the same contents and citations are in english wiki draft. Manojk (talk) 20:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 May newsletter
The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:


 * 1) Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
 * 2) 🇨🇽 AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
 * 3) Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
 * 4) Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
 * 5) Vexilloid of the Roman Empire.svg Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
 * 6) Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
 * 7) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The House Is Burning (album)


Hello, VersaceSpace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The House Is Burning".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:10, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Streets (Doja Cat song)
The article Streets (Doja Cat song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Streets (Doja Cat song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Realmaxxver -- Realmaxxver (talk) 16:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
 * 🇨🇽 AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
 * Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
 * GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
 * 🇺🇳 Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
 * 🇨🇽 AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
 * Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
 * GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
 * 🇺🇳 Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Please list the article at AfD
I saw your edit to the iran neighborhood. Although the rationale makes sense, it needs to be listed at WP:AfD (JayPlaysStuff &#124; talk to me &#124; What I've been up to) 15:44, 19 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi JayPlaysStuff, from my experience on WP, I feel that Articles for Deletion is a venue solely for deletion, whereas redirecting an article is a separate process. Is there a guideline or rule which says that re-directing an article requires a successful nomination at AfD? That's a genuine question: I have just returned to WP from a long break that lasted about half a year, so I may be rusty on the rules in this situation. Thanks -- versacespace  leave a message!  16:19, 19 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Oh I see. Yeah it's likely to be uncontroversial in that case, it was not suitable for articlehood. There is Redirects for discussion but that's for deleting or retargeting redirects, not creating ones. (JayPlaysStuff &#124; talk to me &#124; What I've been up to) 17:44, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, the article of concern has been nominated for deletion, so I'm not worried about it anymore. To be honest, I was using this redirection as a way to get rid of the article, which I maybe shouldn't have done, but I'm sure you understand what my angle was. :) -- versacespace  leave a message!  17:52, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * thank you! I've always wondered why deleting articles made without effort is so much harder than creating them. The bar for notability is so low, and yet we still have articles on towns called "Water Distribution Company" and "Iran Engineerging Company" (← can you believe that's a blue link?). I can't say this hasn't been entertaining though. -- VersaceSpace  🌃 23:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Sam Gilliam

 * PFHLai, thank you! -- VersaceSpace  🌃 21:38, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the nomination. Cheers!  --PFHLai (talk) 00:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Michael C. Stenger for RD
Thank you, VersaceSpace, for nominating Michael C. Stenger for RD, but this has already been nominated. So, I removed your duplicated nomination. Just an FYI. Happy editing. Cheers! --PFHLai (talk) 18:50, 30 June 2022 (UTC)


 * what a shame, I thought I checked first...thanks for letting me know. -- VersaceSpace  🌃 18:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Better luck next time. Cheers! --PFHLai (talk) 01:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 July newsletter
The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:


 * ICS Zulu.svg BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.
 * Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.

Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WAP (song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WAP (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MaranoFan -- MaranoFan (talk) 13:02, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WAP (song)
The article WAP (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:WAP (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MaranoFan -- MaranoFan (talk) 14:02, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Funk Wav Bounces Vol. 2
Hello! Your submission of Funk Wav Bounces Vol. 2 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PCN02WPS ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 03:35, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletions
Hello, VersaceSpace,

First, I want to thank you for your contributions to the project! Second, I was looking at upcoming PRODS and Category:Proposed deletion as of 28 June 2022 has over 100 PRODs for the day which is much more than our typical number of 10-40 PRODs/day. I see at least 37 that you tagged and I just wanted to encourage you to please not go on a mass-tagging spree over a short period of time.

Right now, there are typically two admins who patrol Proposed deletions daily and review tagged articles and files to make sure the tagging is appropriate and we both juggle other activities we do on the project. There is no reason you couldn't tag 5-12 articles/day instead of packing them all into one day. I know editors get on a roll with a big project you take on but please remember down the road, some admin will need to check your work and follow through on the taggings so if you could pace yourself with any kind of deletion taggings (CSDs, PRODs, XfDs), well, we would appreciate it. I wish there were more admins who were active in different areas of the project but as it is, we're spread a little thin these days and we all have our specific areas we tend to focus on. Thanks again for all of your work. It's appreciated! Liz Read! Talk! 19:15, 29 June 2022 (UTC)


 * thank you. I'll limit the PRODs and instead probably take the matter to the AN where it can be handled (hopefully) more efficiently. -- VersaceSpace  🌃 19:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Oh, also, one more thing, VersaceSpace. I'm a HUGE advocate of posting notifications for editors when you tag one of their article creations for deletion, I think almost 50% of my edits are notices to editor talk pages. However, Carlossuarez46 hasn't been active for over a year and, at this point, is unlikely to return. Hundreds of his articles have been tagged for deletion as PRODs and those editors who've undertaken cleaning out some of his lesser contributions either do not post a notice on his talk page or just post a general notice stating they have tagged some of his page creations instead of posting one for each individual article. There definitely doesn't need to be dozens or hundreds of PROD notices on this talk page, it's overwhelming. So, just skip the notices for this editor right now. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 00:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you Liz, I've been leaving the "notify editor" box on twinkle unchecked. -- VersaceSpace  🌃 13:51, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WAP (song)
The article WAP (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:WAP (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MaranoFan -- MaranoFan (talk) 16:22, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

📝see my work 01:17, 6 July 2022 (UTC) 📝see my work 01:54, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * BRUH OMG CONGRATS,,, This is perhaps one of the most notable and iconic songs to come out of the 2020s, in part due to its literal chokehold on certain conservatives... like Ben Sha-P-Word. I'm amazed that you brought an article of a widely covered topic to GA quality - you should be extremely proud! ‍ ‍ elias. 🧣 ‍  ‍ 💬reach out to me
 * Elias, thank you so much! FA next ;). Never done it before WAP seems like the type of article that should be a featured article. -- VersaceSpace  🌃 01:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It does! The article's looking pretty comprehensive on all major aspects of the topic, though I would suggest running it through the Guild of Copyeditors to weed out possible typos and awkward sentences, then through a peer review to prepare it for FAC. One thing that immediately came to mind as I skimmed the article: they're pretty nitpicky/insistent on the sources being "high-quality", so I'd recommend minimising the Twitter/Insta sources wherever possible.
 * Good luuuuuck with this, I know you can do it! We desperately need more pop music FAs; god bless whoever worked on all the 1989 articles. <b style="font-family:Georgia;border-radius:3em;padding:4px;background:#962c2e;color:white;">‍ ‍ elias. 🧣 ‍ </b> ‍ <span style="display:inline-block;margin-bottom:-0.3em;vertical-align:-0.4em;line-height:1.2em;font-size:80%;text-align:left"><sup style="font-size:inherit;line-height:inherit;vertical-align:baseline">💬reach out to me
 * Thanks for the advice! The first order of business for me is to trim the weakly sourced content. It won't be easy, but I'm really excited. -- VersaceSpace  🌃 01:57, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * On second thought I might skip the GOCE. If there's any prose-related issues I'm sure a peer review will catch that, and I've already requested one of those. -- VersaceSpace  🌃 23:59, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * I appreciate it! -- VersaceSpace  🌃 14:13, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

I appreciate your help!

 * I've added another comment, . -- VersaceSpace  🌃 20:48, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

COVID-19 Pandemic in the Pitcairn Islands Article
Hey @VersaceSpace just wanted to give you a heads up that I went through the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Pitcairn Islands article, fixed it up, and approved it.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 01:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * fine with me. — VersaceSpace  🌃 01:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Request on 02:47:01, 12 July 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Mandrakito
Hi, I really appreciate your suggestions in order to improve my draft. I am not familiar with the WikiEditor and I'll work hard to make it better. I disagree with your remark "Railways in Cuba?", because, in 1958 Cuba had more railway trackage per square mile than any other country. Yes, there is a Wikipedia article covering railways in Cuba under the title: "Ferrocarriles de Cuba", but it is very badly written and plagued with errors and inaccuracies. The purpose of my article was to serve as a complement to the one already published and fill in the gap left by not mentioning the aggressive program of dieselization carried out by "Ferrocarriles Occidentales de Cuba S.A. sincerely, --Mandrakito (talk) 02:47, 12 July 2022 (UTC)


 * I have no strong opinions. You should seek the guidance of a Wikipedia user who knows about this kind of thing, but I'm confident that it's adequately covered somewhere in Wikipedia. — VersaceSpace  🌃 01:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

About your rejection of Draft:Prima- class Cruise ship
As the class is now named and no longer known by the code name I pasted the text from Project Leonardo into the draft so the text has already been approved by someone. History Buff1239ubj (talk) 14:09, 11 July 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't really have to know about all that. After reading your draft, I still had no idea what the subject was, which is why I declined it. After reading an article, I should have at least a basic understanding of the topic, readers need "context". -- VersaceSpace  🌃 14:12, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you I just thought that it would be approved as it is text pasted from an existing article. Could you improve it please? History Buff1239ubj (talk) 14:16, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I would love to, but I really do not know anything at all about the topic. I see you tried to link WikiProject Ships on your user page, but the prefix should be WP: and not User:. You should probably ask there, that project is full of people who actually have a thorough and comprehensive understanding of the topic, and would have much more to say. -- VersaceSpace  🌃 14:20, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I will follow your instructions. History Buff1239ubj (talk) 14:57, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. If you have any general questions about using Wikipedia I could help you. Have a good day! -- VersaceSpace  🌃 15:02, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
 * There is one. What was the first Wikipedia article History Buff1239ubj (talk) 15:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * , I meant questions about editing, but since you asked, according to WP:Wikipedia's oldest articles, it would be Nupedia. — VersaceSpace  🌃 15:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks History Buff1239ubj (talk) 15:25, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Kenneth Petty for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kenneth Petty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kenneth Petty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Gatoclass (talk) 10:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Osarhieme Osadolor (2nd nomination)
Hey, don't you think it should have been closed as Speedy keep instead of Keep? Greetings from this end.  Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  19:43, 16 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Hmm...perhaps. But I'm pretty sure in order for SK to apply the nomination needs to clearly meet one of the criteria, so I think snow keeping is safer. Thank you — VersaceSpace  🌃 19:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Alright.  Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  20:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Wheelie (song)
Hello! Your submission of Wheelie (song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <B> Naruto love hinata 5</B> (talk · contributions) 04:12, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Demi Lovato substance.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Demi Lovato substance.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bizarre BizarreTalk modern to me 23:25, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Nicki Minaj
Hi VersaceSpace, I undid some of your edits on Nicki Minaj because some, especially the lead image and her records in the lead, were decided through RfCs.

Lead image RfC where the 2017 photo was decided to be used (not edited to hell BTW, check the source video)

Records in lead RfC

However, I do agree with some of the other rationale of your edits, such as the Instagram followers being unnecessary fancruft. I would like to point out though, articles like Eminem have his alter egos in "other names" as well. I'll be doing a partial restore to the edits that weren't decided through consensus rogueshanghai chat (they/them) 06:54, 18 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Here is a direct screenshot of the source video of Minaj. You can see for yourself if it's edited or not. rogueshanghai chat (they/them) 07:32, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Alright. FWIW, I did not specifically claim that a single person edited the image (through Remini or whatever), but it (and the associated video) has likely been touched by whoever edited the promotion. — VersaceSpace  🌃 13:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi VersaceSpace, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3AVersaceSpace added] the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed' and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned prolific creators of articles where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!  Schwede 66  21:59, 24 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you! — VersaceSpace  🌃 22:00, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

If you
ignore them singular they, they will stop. Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Up until I joined the Wiki, I had no idea there were still people who do not understand the singular they. Even native english speakers. It's crazy. — VersaceSpace  🌃 21:08, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Need to Know (Doja Cat song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Need to Know (Doja Cat song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Need to Know (Doja Cat song)
The article Need to Know (Doja Cat song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Need to Know (Doja Cat song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Need to Know GA
Hey friend! Could I please ask to share the Need to Know nom with you because (not to toot my own horn but) I wrote most of the article and kinda made it what it is today haha and so I'd love to help it get that status :) Thanks — cybertrip👽 ( 💬 • 📝)  11:34, 14 July 2022 (UTC)


 * I thought I responded to this yesterday, but apparently not. Yes you may add yourself. — VersaceSpace  🌃 15:16, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * thx bestie! Just realized I fully forgot to write a "Commercial performance" section. Do you maybe wanna start with that? — cybertrip👽 ( 💬 • 📝)  20:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The "Need to Know" nom picked up a review! Would you mind tending to some of its concerns? Specifically unsourced statements. — VersaceSpace  🌃 13:27, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Funk Wav Bounces Vol. 2
Hello! Your submission of Funk Wav Bounces Vol. 2 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 (talk) 17:14, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Miguel Etchecolatz
Thanks for these! - Last Friday, I attended a unique concert - the 18th Thomaskantor after Bach conducting - and with some good luck caught him happy afterwards! Thank you for the bubble tea! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:35, 10 July 2022 (UTC)


 * That sounds like a really fun outing. Classical music has never been up my alley, but in the moment it must be quite the experience. -- VersaceSpace  🌃 21:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * thank you, and another great concert 14 July: Voces8, pictured - I have a FAC open, in case of interest --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * , I know nothing about the topic, but I'll look through the article sometime within the next two weeks. Sunday I leave for a week to a place with probably no signal, if not I would do it sooner. — VersaceSpace  🌃 21:51, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * thank you, and no rush - more July songs, from Swiss Alps (where I took only the most important things, not a PC) and a funeral --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Illusion (Aespa song)
Hi, I'm Hatto. I found on that you have moved the Bridear draft article to mainspace. Would it be possible for you to move Draft:XG (group) to mainspace as well as Bridear article? --Hatto (talk) 14:23, 15 July 2022 (UTC)


 * It'll be moved soon by an admin (there's already a redirect at XG (group) which needs to be speedily deleted). — VersaceSpace  🌃 15:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! In addition, how about Draft:Illusion (Aespa song)? --Hatto (talk) 15:34, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I nominated the mainspace page for SD. in the future you could just write the article over the redirect if you don't feel like waiting. — VersaceSpace  🌃 15:37, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I noticed that Draft:Illusion (Aespa song) was moved to Illusion (Aespa song) but then moved back by User:Liz again. What do you mean by "Mistaken page move"? I guess I have no problem moving it to mainspace, although I never understood why it was moved back? --Hatto (talk) 01:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * to be honest, I don't know, though I believe the answer lies on 's talk page. You could probably move it back yourself uncontroversially. — VersaceSpace  🌃 12:52, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Funk Wav Bounces Vol. 2
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Need to Know (Doja Cat song)
The article Need to Know (Doja Cat song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Need to Know (Doja Cat song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:42, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Saw your request for NPP privileges
Hey @VersaceSpace I saw your request for NPP privileges and I posted that in the event you were not granted NPP privileges that you should attend instead WP:NPRSCHOOL. I hope this was ok with you, I wasn't trying to be a jerk or imply you're a bad editor or anything. It's a program that I really enjoyed and you seem enthusiastic about NPP so I just wanted to make sure there were avenues available to you. Either way you should check out WP:NPRSCHOOL, I did it with @Atsme and she was a really great mentor.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 09:17, 11 August 2022 (UTC)


 * thanks. I was actually going to do that, but wanted to see if I was regularly eligible yet — VersaceSpace  🌃 11:30, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Sounds good you'll be a great addition! Also completely unrelated to NPP but M.I.A released a new single today and it's an absolute banger. Went to update the article today and I got the impression you might also appreciate her music.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 11:48, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * oh yeah. I have been a pretty big MIA fan in the past, but personally I found "The One" to be underwhelming so I dropped the fangirling a bit. I haven't heard "Popular" yet but if there's enough content in RS I might draft something up. — VersaceSpace  🌃 15:55, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

What your problem man
I’m just saying the truth why is it getting deleted 2607:FEA8:FE10:7FE5:34A6:121E:2F45:71EC (talk) 23:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Piping the "Trudeau Regime" to the Nazi Party is trolling behavior and will be treated as such (i.e. by being removed) — VersaceSpace  🌃 23:44, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stupid Love (Lady Gaga song)
The article Stupid Love (Lady Gaga song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Stupid Love (Lady Gaga song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FrB.TG -- FrB.TG (talk) 17:22, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Mikhail Lomtadze
Hello! I turn to you, as an experienced member of Wikipedia for advice. Please see the article about Mikhail Lomtadze. What advice can you give for improvement? Now there is an active discussion about the keeping or deleting.Deviloper (talk) 06:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC)


 * it would help to condense the article (more focus on him being the richest person in Georgia). I think you can do away with the more positive, promotional stuff. — VersaceSpace  🌃 12:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

New redirect
Hi, hope you are doing well. Would you mind redirecting the page Beautiful Love (Justin Bieber song) to Justin Bieber discography and add the single to his discography page? It is out in some parts of the world and will be out on August 30 midnight in your time wherever you are. There is a link that I am using for proof (but it does not work if it is not midnight in your area): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhk5mCvYs8Q. Thank you! 198.17.32.159 (talk) 20:58, 29 August 2022 (UTC)


 * ✅, and thanks for the request. — VersaceSpace  🌃 00:00, 30 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Would you mind redirecting the page Wrong Decisions to Nav discography? It is a single by him that was released on August 23 last week and this link proves it officially: https://music.apple.com/us/album/wrong-decisions-single/1640523916. Thank you! 198.17.32.159 (talk) 17:39, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ — VersaceSpace  🌃 17:48, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Redirect requests
Hi. Hope you are doing well. Would you please mind redirecting all these pages to the article Demons Protected by Angels? This is the tracklist with alternative writings too.


 * Count on Me (Intro)
 * Count on Me (Nav song)
 * Baby (Nav song)
 * Dead Shot (song)
 * Last of the Mohicans (song)
 * One Time (Nav song)
 * One Time (Nav and Don Toliver song)
 * Demons in My Cup
 * Playa (Nav song)
 * Playa (Nav and Gunna song)
 * Weirdo (Nav song)
 * My Dawg (Nav song)
 * My Dawg (Nav and Lil Durk song)
 * Don't Compare
 * Interstellar (song)
 * Loaded (Nav song)
 * Lost Me (Nav song)
 * Lost Me (Nav and RealestK song)
 * Reset (Nav song)
 * Reset (Nav and Bryson Tiller song)
 * Mismatch (Nav song)
 * Mismatch (Nav and Babyface Ray song)
 * Destiny (Nav song)
 * Ball in Peace
 * Ball in Peace (Outro)

Thank you, thank you, thank you! 108.215.178.233 (talk) 01:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)


 * No, since you're likely a sockpuppet. Sorry, I saw what happened last time. — VersaceSpace  🌃 01:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Black Parade (song)
The article Black Parade (song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Black Parade (song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Black Parade (song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Black Parade (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:41, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Black Parade (song)
The article Black Parade (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Black Parade (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 12:21, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm VickKiang. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed or created, I Love Being Here with You, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

VickKiang (talk) 23:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)